Skip to main content
Log in

Contributions for Repositioning a Regional Strategy for Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities (HM&C): Results of a Pan-American Survey

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the results of the 1st Regional Survey of Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities (HM&C) carried out in 2008 by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and ISALUD University of Argentina. It discusses the responses obtained from 12 countries in the Americas Region. Key informants in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay were selected and encouraged to answer the survey, while informants from Canada and Honduras answered voluntarily and were included in this analysis. The discussion of the results of the Survey provides insight into the current status of HM&C in the Region and suggests key topics for repositioning the Regional strategy relative to: (1) the conceptual identity and tools for HM&C; (2) challenging areas in the implementation process (scale, legal framework, and development of capacities); (3) related strategies and participatory processes such as the ways citizen empowerment in governance is supported; (4) the need to monitor and assess the impact of the HM&C strategy on the health and quality of life of the populations involved; and (5) the need for developing a strategic research and training agenda. The analysis and discussion of these results aims to provide useful input for repositioning the strategy in the Region and contributing to the emergence of a second generation of concepts and tools capable of meeting the developing priorities and needs currently faced by the HM&C strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Throughout this article the acronym HM&C is used as a general term that encompasses all the variations with which this is known throughout the region: Healthy Municipalities, Communities and Environments, as well as Healthy and Productive Municipalities and Communities.

  2. Project entitled “Survey of evidence of local development and health promotion processes focused on the municipal sphere in the Americas region” (PAHO–ISALUD 2008).

  3. Administrated in collaboration with the PAHO Offices in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay. These countries provided a positive answer to the invitation made to implement the Regional Survey. This article also includes the contributions arising from surveys answered by key informers in Honduras and Canada.

  4. Including, in some cases, preventive actions.

  5. On a scale from 1 to 5 for assessing the frequency of collaboration.

  6. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2008/WHO_IER_CSDH_08.1_spa.pdf

  7. http://www.paho.org/Spanish/AD/THS/OS/PHC_brochure_spa.pdf

  8. http://www.paho.org/Spanish/D/HAgenda_Spanish.pdf

  9. Commentary by the representative from Mexico at the Technical Meeting held in October 2008.

  10. Participatory budgeting is a participative democratic tool that lets citizens have an influence on or make decisions relating to the municipal budget. The first experience started in 1989 in the town of Porto Alegre (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil). Since then, each year new municipalities in Latin America have been trying out the use of this methodology and it has spread to other areas of the world.

  11. http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsdemu/fulltext/guiaeval/guiaeval.html

  12. http://www9.euskadi.net/sanidad/osteba/datos/d_05-04_guia_evaluacion_impacto_salud.pdf

References

  1. Goldstein G, Kickbusch, I. WHO healthy cities programme. Urban Health News. 1996; 7–13.

  2. Kickbusch I. The contribution of the World Health Organization to a new public health and health promotion. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(3): 383–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. PAHO/WHO. Healthy municipalities & communities, Mayor’s Guide for promoting quality of life. Washington DC: OPS–OMS; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. O’Neill M, Simard P. Choosing indicators to evaluate Healthy Cities projects: a political task? Health Promot Int. 2006; 21(2): 145–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Robson C. Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Regional Survey of Healthy Municipalities. Country Report from Uruguay, Pan American Health Organization, unpublished; 2008.

  7. Regional Survey of Healthy Municipalities. Country Report from Cuba, Pan American Health Organization, unpublished; 2008.

  8. Regional Survey of Healthy Municipalities. Country Report from Peru, Pan American Health Organization, unpublished; 2008.

  9. WHO. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: WHO; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Regional Survey of Healthy Municipalities. Country Report from Paraguay, Pan American Health Organization, unpublished; 2008.

  11. Regional Survey of Healthy Municipalities. Country Report from Chile, Pan American Health Organization, unpublished; 2008.

  12. Regional Survey of Healthy Municipalities. Country Report from Argentina, Pan American Health Organization, unpublished; 2008.

  13. Regional Survey of Healthy Municipalities. Country Report from Brazil, Pan American Health Organization, unpublished; 2008.

  14. ODA Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships, published by Overseas Development Institute y la Fundación para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo, 2007. Available at: http://www.globalknowledge.org/gkps_portal/index.cfm?menuid=178&parentid=179. Accessed on April 21, 2009.

  15. Akerman M, Mendes R eds. Avaliaçao Participativa de Municipalities, Comunidades e Ambientes Saludaveis: a trajetoria brasileira—memoria, reflexões e experiências, São Paulo: Midia Alternativa/CEPEDOC/CESCO; 2006.

  16. Potvin L, McQueen D, eds. Health promotion evaluation practices in the Americas: values and research. New York: Springer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rice M, Franceschini MC. Lessons learned from the application of a participatory evaluation methodology to Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities initiatives in selected countries of the Americas. Promot Educ. 2007; 9(2): 68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de Rueda Martínez Santos JR. Guía para la evaluación del impacto en la salud y en el bienestar de proyectos, programas o políticas extrasanitarias. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Departamento de Sanidad del Gobierno Vasco; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special acknowledgment of the role of the collaborators who facilitated the implementation of the survey in their respective countries: Nicolás Ortiz R. (Chile), Susana Terry (Cuba), Mario González (Uruguay), Rosilda Mendes (Brazil), Marcelo Korc (Colombia), Bibiana García and Luis Roberto Escoto (Argentina), Diana Rodríguez (Paraguay), Xinia Bustamante (Costa Rica), Celeste Cambria R. and Carlos Contreras R. (Peru), Adriana Hernández (Honduras), Elia Lara Lona (México), and Paule Simard (Canada).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Meresman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meresman, S., Rice, M., Vizzotti, C. et al. Contributions for Repositioning a Regional Strategy for Healthy Municipalities, Cities and Communities (HM&C): Results of a Pan-American Survey. J Urban Health 87, 740–754 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9457-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9457-1

Keywords

Navigation