Skip to main content
Log in

Neighborhood Effects on an Individual’s Health Using Neighborhood Measurements Developed by Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study suggests a multivariate-structural approach combining factor analysis and cluster analysis that could be used to examine neighborhood effects on an individual’s health. Data were from the Taiwan Social Change Survey conducted in 1990, 1995, and 2000. In total, 5,784 women and men aged over 20 years living in 428 neighborhoods were interviewed. Participants’ addresses were geocoded with census data for measuring neighborhood-level characteristics. The factor analysis was applied to identify neighborhood dimensions, which were used as entities in the cluster analysis to generate a neighborhood typology. The factor analysis generated three neighborhood dimensions: neighborhood education, age structure, and neighborhood family structure and employment. The cluster analysis generated six types of neighborhoods with combinations of the three neighborhood dimensions. Multilevel binomial regression models were used to assess the effects of neighborhoods on an individual’s health. The results showed that the biggest health differences were between two neighborhood types: (1) the highest concentration of inhabitants younger than 15 years, a moderate education level, and a moderate level of single-parent families and (2) the highest educational level, a median level of single-parent families, and a median level of elderly concentrations. Individuals living in the first type had significantly higher chances of having functional limitations and poor self-rated health than the individuals in the second neighborhood type. Our study suggests that the multivariate-structural approach improves neighborhood measurements by addressing neighborhood diversity and examining how an individual’s health varies in different neighborhood contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diez Roux AV. Invited commentary: places, people, and health. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(8):516–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Cummins S. Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure? Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:125–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Picket KE, Pearl M. Multivariate analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Gannon-Rowley T. Assessing “neighborhood effects”: social processes and new directions in research. Annu Rev Sociology. 2002;28:443–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cubbin C, Marchi K, Lin M, et al. Is neighborhood deprivation independently associated with maternal and infant health? Evidence from Florida and Washington. Matern Child Health J. 2008;12(1):61–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sundquist J, Malmstrom M, Johansson S-E. Cardiovascular risk factors and the neighbourhood environment: a multivariate analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(5):841–845.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Lochner K, Prothrow-Stith D. Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(9):1491–1498.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lochner K, Kawachi I, Brennan R, Buka S. Social capital and neighborhood mortality rates in Chicago. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(8):1797–1805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multivariate study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997;277(15):918–924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Subramanian SV, Kim DJ, Kawachi I. Social trust and self-rated health in US communities: a multivariate analysis. J Urban Health. 2002;79(4):s21–s34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Coulton CJ, Cook T, Irwin M. Aggregation issues in neighborhood research: a comparison of several levels of census geography and resident defined neighborhoods. Proceedings of the Association for Public Policy and Management Conference, Atlanta, GA; 2004.

  12. Coulton CJ, Korbin J, Chan T, Su M. Mapping residents’ perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: a methodological note. Am J Community Psychol. 2001;29(2):371–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haynes R, Daras K, Reading R, Jones A. Modifiable neighbourhood units, zone design and residents’ perceptions. Health Place. 2007;13(4):812–825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chow J. Differentiating urban neighborhoods: a multivariate structural model analysis. Soc Work Res. 1998;22(3):131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gorsuch RL. Factor Analysis. 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rapkin BD, Luke DA. Cluster analysis in community research: epistemology and practice. Am J Community Psychol. 1993;21(2):247–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Drukker M, Kaplan C, Os JV. Residential instability in socioeconomically deprived neighbourhoods, good or bad? Health Place. 2005;11(2):121–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK. Cluster Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dupere V, Perkins DD. Community types and mental health: a multivariate study of local environmental stress and coping. Am J Community Psychol. 2007;39(1–2):107–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Davies W. Urban Social Structure: A Multivariate-Structural Analysis of Cardiff and Its Region. Cardiff, Wales: University of Wales Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chang Y-H. Taiwan Social Change Survey Report. vol. 4-1, Taipei: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chiu H-Y. Taiwan Social Change Survey Report. vol. 2-1, Taipei: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chiu H-Y. Taiwan Social Change Survey Report. vol. 3-1, Taipei: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Johnston RJ. Residential area characteristics: research method for identifying urban subareas-social area analysis and factorial ecology. In: Theodorson GA, ed. Urban Patterns: Studies in Human Ecology. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson WJ. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner-City, the Underclass and Public Policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Browning CR, Cagney KA. Moving beyond poverty: neighborhood structure, social processes, and health. J Health Soc Behav. 2003;44(4):552–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cagney KA. Neighborhood age structure and its implications for health. J Urban Health. 2006;83(5):827–834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Milligan GW, Cooper MC. Methodology review: clustering methods. Appl Psychol Meas. 1987;11(4):329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Punj G, Stewart DW. Cluster analysis and marketing research: review and suggestions for application. J Mark Res. 1983;20:134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sundquist K, Winkleby M, Ahlen H, Sven-Erik J. Neighborhood socioeconomic environment and incidence of coronary heart disease: a follow-up study of 25,319 women and men in Sweden. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):655–662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chang H, Chou Y. Amending health disparities in Taiwan’s indigenous population. Harvard Health Policy Rev. 2002;3(2):40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lee MC, Jones AM. Understanding differences in income-related health inequality between geographic regions in Taiwan using the SF-36. Health Policy. 2007;83(2–3):186–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bailis DS, Segall A, Chipperfield JG. Two views of self-rated general health status. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(2):203–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Molarius A, Janson S. Self-rated health, chronic diseases, and symptoms among middle-aged and elderly men and women. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(4):364–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tienda M. Poor people and poor places: deciphering neighborhood effects on poverty outcomes. In: Huber J, ed. Macro–Micro Linkages in Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991:204–212.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ellaway A, Macintyre S. Is social participation associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors? Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(7):1384–1391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hyyppa M, Maki J. Social participation and health in a community rich in stock of social capital. Health Educ Res. 2003;18(6):770–779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying-Chih Chuang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, YS., Chuang, YC. Neighborhood Effects on an Individual’s Health Using Neighborhood Measurements Developed by Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis. J Urban Health 86, 5–18 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-008-9306-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-008-9306-7

Keywords

Navigation