Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender Ideologies, Socioeconomic Opportunities, and HIV/STI-related Vulnerability among Female, African-American Adolescents

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of gender within HIV/STI prevention has become widely recognized. However, gender ideologies associated with vulnerability to HIV/STI are often examined and addressed without sufficient attention to the larger socioeconomic context within which they arise and evolve. We conducted a cross-sectional survey with 155 female, African-American adolescents recruited from two health clinics in Baltimore, Maryland. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to assess the relationships between HIV/STI vulnerability resulting from male partner concurrency, adherence to traditional female gender norms, using a measure of hyperfemininity, and perceived socioeconomic opportunity structures. The likelihood of reported partner concurrency increased significantly among participants reporting higher levels of hyperfemininity (OR = 2.08; 95%CI = 1.01–4.30). Hyperfeminine thinking and behavior was significantly lower in the context of higher perceived socioeconomic opportunity structures (OR = 0.87; 95%CI = 0.79–0.95). Interventions seeking to promote gender equity and reduce HIV/STI may be more effective when the socioeconomic context of gender ideologies is assessed and addressed. Programs and policies to increase educational and professional opportunity structures, particularly among marginalized communities, should be actively integrated into HIV/STI prevention planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta GR. Gender, Sexuality and HIV/AIDS: The What, the Why and the How. Plenary Address at the 13th International AIDS Conference in Durban, South Africa. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pleck JH, O’Donnell LN. Gender attitudes and health risk behaviors in urban African American and Latino early adolescents. Matern Child Health J. 2001;5(4):265–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Sullivan LF, Hoffman S, Harrison A, Dolezal C. Men, multiple sexual partners, and young adults’ sexual relationships: understanding the role of gender in the study of risk. J Urban Health. 2006;83(4):695–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Santana MC, Raj A, Decker MR, La Marche A, Silverman JG. Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. J Urban Health. 2006;83(4):575–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pulerwitz J, Barker G, Segundo M, Nascimento M. Promoting More Gender-equitable Norms and Behaviors among Young Men as an HIV/AIDS Prevention Strategy. Horizons Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barker G. Dying to be Men: Youth, Masculinity and Social Exclusion. New York, NY: Routledge; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Whitehead T. Urban, low-income African-American men, HIV/AIDS, and gender identity. Med Anthropol Q. 1997;11(4):411–447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kerrigan D, Andrinopoulos K, Johnson R, Parham P, Thomas T, Ellen JM. Staying strong: gender ideologies among African-American adolescents and the implications for HIV/STI prevention. J Sex Res. 2007;44(2):172–180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Andrinopoulos K, Kerrigan D, Ellen JM. Understanding sex partner selection from the perspective of inner-city black adolescents. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38(3):132–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006;55(5):1–108.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lenoir C. “Love yourself first” the development and perceived effectiveness of concurrency prevention messages [dissertation]. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University; 2006.

  12. Sobo EJ. Choosing Unsafe Sex: AIDS-Risk Denial among Disadvantaged Women. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Society for Adolescent Medicine. Position paper. HIV infection and AIDS in adolescents: an update of the position of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38:88–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cases of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States, by race/ethnicity, 2000–2004. HIV/AIDS Surveill. 2006;12(1):1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Racial/ethnic disparities in diagnoses of HIV/AIDS—33 states, 2001–2004. MMWR Weekly. 2006;55(05):121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Forhan S. Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Bacterial Vaginosis among Female Adolescents in the United States: Data from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2004. Paper presented at: National STD Prevention Conference; March 10–13, 2008; Chicago, Illinois.

  17. City of Baltimore. Baltimore Census—2000. http://www.ci.baltimore.md.us/government/planning/census/index.php. Accessed May 1, 2008.

  18. Baltimore Neighborhood Indicator Alliance. 2004. Baltimore’s Vital Signs. http://www.ubalt.edu/bnia/indicators/index.html. Accessed May 1, 2008.

  19. Baltimore City Data Alliance. Community Profiles—March, 2007. http://www.baltimorekidsdata.org. Accessed May 1, 2008.

  20. Rosenberg MD, Gurvey JE, Adler N, Dunlop MB, Ellen JM. Concurrent sex partners and risk for sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26(4):208–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jennings J, Glass B, Parham P, Adler N, Ellen J. Sex partner concurrency, geographic context, and adolescent sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31:733–739.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lenoir CD, Adler NE, Borzekowski DL, Tschann JM, Ellen JM. What you don’t know can hurt you: perceptions of sex-partner concurrency and partner-reported behavior. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38(3):179–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Murnen S, Byrne D. Hyperfemininity: measurement and initial validation of the construct. J Sex Res. 1991;28:479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Short J, Rivera R, Tennyson R. Perceived opportunities, gang membership, and delinquency. Am Sociol Rev. 1965;30:56–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith C, Noll J, Becker-Bryant J. The effect of social context on gender self-concept. Sex Roles. 1999;40:499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stryker S. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deanna Kerrigan.

Additional information

Kerrigan and Andrinopoulos are with the Department of International Health of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Chung, Glass, and Ellen are with the Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerrigan, D., Andrinopoulos, K., Chung, Se. et al. Gender Ideologies, Socioeconomic Opportunities, and HIV/STI-related Vulnerability among Female, African-American Adolescents. J Urban Health 85, 717–726 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-008-9292-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-008-9292-9

Keywords

Navigation