Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incarceration and Risky Sexual Partnerships in a Southern US City

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Incarceration is strongly associated with HIV infection and may contribute to viral transmission by disrupting stable partnerships and promoting high-risk partnerships. We investigated incarceration and STI/HIV-related partnerships among a community-based sample recruited for a sexual behavior interview while frequenting venues where people meet sexual partners in a North Carolina city (N = 373). Men reporting incarceration in the past 12 months were more likely than men without recent incarceration to experience multiple new sexual partnerships (unadjusted prevalence ratio [PR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–3.1) and transactional sex defined as trading sex for money, goods, or services (unadjusted PR: 4.0, 95% CI: 2.3–7.1) in the past 4 weeks. Likewise, women who were ever incarcerated were more likely than never-incarcerated women to experience recent multiple new partnerships (unadjusted PR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.8–5.4) and transactional sex (unadjusted PR: 5.3, 95% CI: 2.6–10.9). Sexual partnership in the past 12 months with someone who had ever been incarcerated versus with partners with no known incarceration history was associated with recent multiple new partnerships (men: unadjusted PR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4–2.9, women: unadjusted PR 4.8, 95% CI 2.3–10.1) and transactional sex (men: unadjusted PR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7–6.6, women: unadjusted PR 6.1, 95% CI 2.4–15.4). Adjustment for demographic and socioeconomic variables had minimal effect on estimates. However, the strong overlap between incarceration, partner incarceration, and substance abuse had substantial effects in multivariable models. Correctional-facility and community-based HIV prevention, with substance abuse treatment, should reach currently and formerly incarcerated individuals and their sexual partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maruschak LM. HIV In Prisons, 2001. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report 2005, Volume 17, 2006.

  3. Hammett TM. HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases, and incarceration among women: national and southern perspectives. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:S17–S22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson FE, et al. Heterosexually transmitted HIV infection among African Americans in North Carolina. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41:616–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Manhart LE, Aral SO, Holmes KK, Foxman B. Sex partner concurrency: measurement, prevalence, and correlates among urban 18–39-year-olds. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:133–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson FE, Donaldson KH, Stancil TR, Fullilove RE. Concurrent partnerships among rural African Americans with recently reported heterosexually transmitted HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34:423–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson F, Donaldson KH, Stancil TR, Fullilove RE. Concurrent sexual partnerships among African Americans in the rural south. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14:155–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tyndall MW, Patrick D, Spittal P, Li K, O’Shaughnessy MV, Schechter MT. Risky sexual behaviours among injection drugs users with high HIV prevalence: implications for STD control. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78(Suppl 1):i170–i175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. North Carolina Department of Heath and Human Services. N. C. HIV/STD Surveillance Report 2006. Raleigh, NC: Epidemiology Section, Division of Public Health, North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services; 2006.

  10. Weir SS, Pailman C, Mahlalela X, Coetzee N, Meidany F, Boerma JT. People to places: focusing AIDS prevention efforts where it matters most. AIDS. 2003;17:895–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986;42:121–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, Hafner JP. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:940–943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:702–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zocchetti C, Consonni D, Bertazzi PA. Estimation of prevalence rate ratios from cross-sectional data. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24:1064–1065.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maldonado G, Greenland S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138:923–936.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Prison and Jail Inmates at 2003. Washington, DC 2004.

  17. Comfort M, Grinstead O, McCartney K, Bourgois P, Knight K. “You Can’t Do Nothing in This Damn Place”: sex and intimacy among couples with an incarcerated male partner. J Sex Res. 2005;42:3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lowenstein A. Coping with stress: the case of prisoner’s wives. J Marriage Fam. 2005;46:699–708.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Comfort M. ‘Papa’s house’: the prison as domestic and social satellite. Ethnography. 2002;3:467–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Browning S, Miller S, Lisa M. Criminal incarceration dividing the ties that bind: Black men and their families. J Afr Am Men. 2001;6:87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moore J. Bearing the burden: how incarceration weakens inner-city communities. In: Fulbright K, ed. The Unintended Consequences of Incarceration. New York: Vera Institute of Justice; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rindfuss R, Stephen EH. Marital noncohabitation: separation does not make the heart grow fonder. J Marriage Fam. 1990;52:259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schneller D. Prisoner’s families: a study of some social and psychological effects of incarceration on the families of negro prisoners. Criminology. 1975;12:402–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Adimora AA, Schoenbach V. Social context, sexual networks, and racial disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:S115–S122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Visher C, La Vigne NG, Travis J. Maryland pilot study: Findings from Baltimore. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Center; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  26. MacGowan RJ, Margolis A, Gaiter J, et al. Predictors of risky sex of young men after release from prison. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14:519–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Belenko S, Peugh J. Estimating drug treatment needs among state prison inmates. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;77:269–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Meade CS. Sexual risk behavior among persons dually diagnosed with severe mental illness and substance use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30:147–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Somlai AM, Kelly JA, McAuliffe TL, Ksobiech K, Hackl KL. Predictors of HIV sexual risk behaviors in a community sample of injection drug-using men and women. AIDS Behav. 2003;7:383–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. CDC. Drug-Associated HIV Transmission Continues in the United States. Accessed March 2006. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/facts/idu.htm. National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention, Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2002b.

  31. Kral AH, Bluthenthal RN, Lorvick J, Gee L, Bacchetti P, Edlin BR. Sexual transmission of HIV-1 among injection drug users in San Francisco, USA: risk-factor analysis. Lancet. 2001;357:1397–1401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Strathdee SA, Galai N, Safaiean M, et al. Sex differences in risk factors for hiv seroconversion among injection drug users: a 10-year perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1281–1288.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Booth RE, Kwiatkowski CF, Chitwood DD. Sex related HIV risk behaviors: differential risks among injection drug users, crack smokers, and injection drug users who smoke crack. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000;58:219–226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gorman EM, Carroll RT. Substance abuse and HIV: considerations with regard to methamphetamines and other recreational drugs for nursing practice and research. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2000;11:51–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Molitor F, Ruiz JD, Flynn N, Mikanda JN, Sun RK, Anderson R. Methamphetamine use and sexual and injection risk behaviors among out-of-treatment injection drug users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999;25:475–493.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. The influence of psychosocial factors, alcohol, drug use on African-American women’s high-risk sexual behavior. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:54–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Castillo Mezzich A, Tarter RE, Giancola PR, Lu S, Kirisci L, Parks S. Substance use and risky sexual behavior in female adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997;44:157–166.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dinwiddie SH. Characteristics of injection drug users derived from a large family study of alcoholism. Compr Psychiatry. 1997;38:218–229.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Iguchi MY, Bux DA, Jr. Reduced probability of HIV infection among crack cocaine-using injection drug users. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1008–1012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shrier L, Emans S, Woods E, Durant R. The association of sexual risk behaviors and problem drug behaviors in high school students. J Adolesc Health. 1996;20:377–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hudgins R, McCusker J, Stoddard A. Cocaine use and risky injection and sexual behaviors. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995;37:7–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Graves KL, Leigh BC. The relationship of substance use to sexual activity among young adults in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995;27:18–22, 33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Strunin L, Hingson R. Alcohol, drugs, and adolescent sexual behavior. Int J Addict. 1992;27:129–146.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Catania JA, Gibson DR, Chitwood DD, et al. Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychol Bull. 1990;108:339–362.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the University of North Carolina Center for AIDS Research (9P30A150410) and the National Institute of Drug Abuse via RO1 MH068719-01. The conclusions expressed here are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the funders.

The authors thank Sherri Harris and Sandy Michael of NIA Community Action Center, Willie Garrison of the Wright Focus Group, and Nancy Jackson of the UNC-CH Center for AIDS Research for their leadership in the field and insights into study findings; all members of the NC PLACE Steering Committee for guidance and support through the study planning, implementation, and dissemination; the NC PLACE Study interviewing team members for their diligence; and members of the UNC-CH Bridges to Good Health and Treatment (BRIGHT) Working Group for their consistent support during NC PLACE field and data analysis activities, with particular thanks to Monique Williams, Tracina Williams, Danielle Haley, Becky Stephenson-White, Anna Scheyette, Carol Golin, and Andrew Kaplan. We dedicate this research to the memories of Andrew Kaplan and Willie Garrison, who continue to inspire our efforts to prevent HIV transmission in North Carolina and beyond.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria R. Khan MPH, Doctoral Candidate.

Additional information

Khan, Weir, Adimora, Kaufman, and Miller are with the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Wohl is with the Center for AIDS Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Wohl, Adimora, and Miller are with the Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Weir is with the The MEASURE Evaluation Project, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Moseley is with the Guilford County Department of Public Health, Greensboro, NC, USA; Norcott is with the Sickle Cell Disease Association of the Piedmont, Guilford County, NC, USA; Duncan is with the Triad Health Project, Guilford County, NC, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, M.R., Wohl, D.A., Weir, S.S. et al. Incarceration and Risky Sexual Partnerships in a Southern US City. J Urban Health 85, 100–113 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9237-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9237-8

Keywords

Navigation