Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Street Policing, Injecting Drug Use and Harm Reduction in a Russian City: A Qualitative Study of Police Perspectives

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We undertook a qualitative exploration of police perspectives on injecting drug use and needle and syringe access among injecting drug users (IDUs) in a Russian city which has witnessed explosive spread of HIV associated with drug injecting. Twenty-seven in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted in May 2002 with police officers of varying rank who reported having regular contact with IDUs. All interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed, translated and coded thematically. Accounts upheld an approach to policing which emphasised high street-based visibility and close surveillance of IDUs. IDUs were depicted as ‘potential criminals’ warranting a ‘pre-emptive’ approach to the prevention of drug-related crime. Street policing was described as a means of maintaining close surveillance leading to the official registration of persons suspected or proven to be users of illicit drugs. Such registration enabled further ongoing surveillance, including through stop and search procedures. While aware of drug users' reluctance to carry injecting equipment linked to their fears of detention or arrest, accounts suggested that the confiscation of previously used injecting equipment can constitute evidence in relation to drugs possession charges and that discovery of clean injecting equipment may be sufficient to raise suspicion and/or further investigation, including through stop and search or questioning. Our findings suggest an uneasy relationship between street policing and needle and syringe access, whereby policing strategies can undermine an HIV prevention ethos promoting needle and syringe accessibility among IDUs. We conclude that facilitating partnerships between policing agencies and HIV prevention initiatives are a critical feature of creating environments conducive for risk reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blankenship KM, Bray SJ, Merson MH. Structural interventions in public health. AIDS. 2000;14(Suppl 1):S11–S21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blankenship KM, Friedman SR, Dworkin S, Mantell JE. Structural interventions: concepts, challenges and opportunities for research. J. Urban Health; 2006 (in press).

  3. Rhodes T, Singer M, Bourgois P, Friedman SR, Strathdee SA. The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1026–1044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Galea S, Ahern J, Vlahov D. Contexual determinants of drug use risk behaviour: a theoretic framework. J Urban Health. 2003;80:50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Galea S, Nandi A, Vlahov D. The social epidemiology of drug use. Epidemiol Rev. 2004;26:36–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnett T, Whiteside A. HIV/AIDS and development: case studies and a conceptual framework. Eur J Dev Res. 1999;11:200–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rhodes T, Simic M. Transition and the HIV risk environment. Br Med J. 2005;331:220–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rhodes T, Ball A, Stimson GV, Kobyshcha Y, Fitch C, Pokrovsky V, et al. HIV infection in the newly independent states, eastern Europe: the social and economic context of epidemics. Addiction. 1999;94:1323–1336.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerr T, Small W, Wood E. The public health and social impacts of drug market enforcement: a review of the evidence. Int J Drug Policy. 2005;16:210–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burris S, Blankenship KM, Donoghoe M, Sherman S, Vernick JS, Case P, Lazzarini Z, Koester S. Addressing the ‘risk environment’ for injection drug users: the mysterious case of the missing cop. Milbank Q. 2004;82:125–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Des Jarlais D. Structural interventions to reduce HIV transmission among injecting drug users. AIDS. 2000;14(Suppl 1):S41–S46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman SR, Cooper HLF, Tempalski B, Keem M, Friedman R, Flom PL, Des Jarlais DC. Relationships of deterrence and law enforcement to drug-related harms among drug injectors in U.S. metropolitan areas. AIDS. 2006;20:93–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koester S. Copping, running and paraphernalia laws: contextual variables and needle risk behaviour among injection drug users in Denver. Human Organ. 1994;53:287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bluthenthal RN, Kral AH, Lorvick J, Watters J. Collateral damage in the war on drugs: HIV risk behaviors among injection drug users. Int J Drug Policy. 1999;10:25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Taussig JA, Weinstein B, Burris S, Jones ST. Syringe laws and pharmacy regulations are structural constraints on HIV prevention in the U.S. AIDS. 2000;14(Suppl 1):S47–S51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fitzgerald J, Dovey K, Dietze P, Rumbold G. Health outcomes and quasi-supervised settings for street injecting drug use. Int J Drug Policy. 1994;15:247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maher L, Dixon D. Policing and public health. Law enforcement and harm minimization in a street-level drug market. Br J Criminol. 1999;49:488–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aitken C, Moore D, Higgs P, Kelsall J, Kerger M. The impact of a police crackdown on a street drug scene: evidence from the street. Int J Drug Policy. 2002;13:193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Small W, Kerr T, Charette J, Schechter M, Spittal P. Impacts of intensified police activity on injection drug users: evidence from an ethnographic investigation. Int J Drug Policy. 2006;17:85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bluthenthal RN, Kral AH, Lorvick J, Watters JK. Impact of law enforcement on syringe exchange programes: a look at Oakland and San Francisco. Med Anthropol. 1997;18:61–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Davis CS, Burris S, Kraut-Becher J, Lynch KG, Metzger D. Effects of an intensive street-level police intervention on syringe exchange program use in Philadelphia. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:233–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rhodes T, Mikhailova L, Sarang A, Lowndes CM, Rylkov A, Khutorskoy M, et al. Situational Factors influencing drug injecting, risk reduction and syringe exchange practices in Togliatti City, Russian Federation. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:39–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wood E, Kerr T, Small W, Jones J, Schechter MT, Tyndall MW. The impact of police presence on access to needle exchange programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34:116–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fitzgerald J. Policing as public health menace in the policy struggles over public injecting. Int J Drug Policy. 2005;16:203–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Best D, Strang J, Beswick T, Gossop M. Assessment of a concentrated high-profile police operation: no discernable impact on drug availability price or purity. Br J Criminol. 2001;41:738–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bastos FI, Strathdee S. Evaluating effectiveness of syringe exchange programmes. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1771–1782.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rhodes T, Lowndes CM, Judd A, Mikhailova L, Sarang A, Rylkov A, et al. Explosive spread and high prevalence of HIV infection among injecting drug users in Togliatti City, Russia. AIDS. 2002;16:F25–F31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rhodes T, Sarang A, Bobrik A, Bobkov E, Platt L. HIV transmission and HIV prevention associated with injecting drug use in the Russian Federation. Int J Drug Policy. 2004;15:39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rhodes T, Platt L, Maximova S, Koshkina E, Latshevskaya N, Hickman M, Renton A, Bobrova N, McDonald T, Parry JV. Prevalence of HIV, hepatitis C and syphilis among injecting drug users in Russia: a multi-city study. Addiction. 2006;101:252–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Des Jarlais DC, Grund JP, Zadoretzky C, Milliken J, Friedman P, Titus S, et al. HIV risk behaviour among participants of syringe exchange programmes in central/eastern Europe and Russia. Int J Drug Policy. 2002;13:165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Polobinskaya SV. Russian Legislation and the Prevention of HIV among Intravenous Drug Users. (Information booklet), Moscow: Open Society Institute; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Butler WE. HIV/AIDS and Drug Misuse in Russia: Harm Reduction Programmes and the Russian Legal System. London: International Family Health; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Burris S. Harm reduction: what's a lawyer to do? Int J Drug Policy. 2006;17:47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Human Rights Watch (2004) Lessons Not Learned: Human Rights Abuses and HIV/AIDS in the Russian Federation, Human Rights Watch, 16:5(D).

  35. Platt L, Hickman M, Rhodes T, Mikhailova L, Vlasov A, Tilling K, et al. The prevalence of injecting drug use in a Russian city: implications for harm reduction and coverage. Addiction. 2004;99:1430–1438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rhodes T, Platt L, Judd A, Mikhailova L, Sarang A, Wallis N, Alpatova T, Hickman M, Parry JV. Hepatitis C virus infection, HIV co-infection, and associated risk among injecting drug users in Togliatti, Russia. Int J STD AIDS. 2005b;16:749–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rhodes T, Judd A, Mikhailova L, Sarang A, Khutorskoy M, Platt L, et al. Injecting equipment sharing among injecting drug users in Togliatti city, Russian Federation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35:293–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bourgois P, Lettiere M, Quesada J. Social misery and the sanctions of substance use: confronting HIV risk among homeless heroin addicts in San Francisco. Soc Probl. 1997;44:155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bourgois P. U.S. inner-city apartheid: the contours of structural and interpersonal violence. In: Scheper-Hughes N, Bourgois P, eds. Violence in War and Peace: An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell; 2003:297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cooper H, Moore L, Gruskin S, Krieger N. Characterising perceived police violence: implications for public health. Am J Public Health. 2004:94:1109–1118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Iguchi MY, London JA, Forge NG, Hickman L, Fain T, Riehman KS. Elements of well-being affected by criminalizing the drug user. Public Health Reports. 2002;117(Suppl 1):S146–S150.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Roberts DE. The social and moral cost of mass incarceration in African American communities. Stanford Law Rev. 2004;56:1271–1305.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Singer M. AIDS and the health crisis of the U.S. urban poor: the perspective of critical medical anthropology. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39:931–948.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Parker RG, Easton D, Klein CH. Structural barriers and facilitators in HIV prevention: a review of international evidence. AIDS. 2000;14(Suppl 1):S22–S32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Beyer L, Crofts N, Reid G. Drug offending and criminal justice responses: practitioners’ perspectives. Int J Drug Policy, 2002;13:203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Beletsky L, Macalino GE, Burris S. Attitudes of police officers towards syringe access, occupational needle-sticks, and drug use: a qualitative study of one city police department in the United States. Int J Drug Policy. 2005;16:267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Parker R, Aggleton P. HIV and AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: a conceptual framework and implications for action. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:13–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bobrova N, Rhodes T, Power R, Alcorn R, Neifeld E, Kraskiukov N, Latyshevskaia N, Maksimova S. Barriers to accessing drug treatment in Russia: a qualitative study among drug injectors in two cities. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;82(Suppl 1):57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mokieno M, Mokienko I. Harm reduction programme in Sakhalin, Russia. Twelfth International Conference on the Reduction of Drug Related Harm, New Delhi, India; 2001.

  50. Platt L, Rhodes T, Judd A, Koshkina E, Maximova S, Latishevskaya N, et al. Syphilis among injecting drug users in three cities in Russia: the effect of sex work. Am J Public Health; 2006 (in press).

  51. Kleinman A, Das V, Lock M eds. Social Suffering. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1997.

  52. Singer M, Toledo E. Oppression Illness: Critical Theory and Intervention with Women at Risk for AIDS. Washington, District of Columbia, American Anthropology Association; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pederson D. Political violence, ethnic conflict, and contemporary wars: broad implications for health and social well-bring. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Farmer P, Connors M, Simmons J. Women, Poverty and AIDS: Sex, Drugs and Structural Violence. Monroe, Maine: Common Courage; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hough M. Drug user treatment within a criminal justice context. Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37:985–996.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Smith BW, Novak KJ, Frank J, Travis LF. Multi-jurisdictional drug task forces: an analysis of impacts. J Crim Justice. 2000;28:543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Midford R, Acres J, Lenton S, Loxley W, Boots K. Cops, drugs and the community: establishing consultative harm reduction structures in two Western Australian locations. Int J Drug Policy. 2002;13:1810188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Small W. Two cultures passing in the night. Int J Drug Policy. 2006;16:221–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hammett TM, Bartlett NA, Chen Y, Ngu D, Cuong D, Dinh, Phuong N, Minh, et al. Law enforcement influences on HIV prevention for injection drug users: observations from a cross-border project in China and Vietnam. Int J Drug Policy. 2005;16:235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the support of the UK Department for International Development for project funding support, and to the UK Department of Health for core funding to the Centre for Research on Drugs and Health Behaviour. We also thank Alexandra Kornienko for her assistance during fieldwork. We would also like to thank the Togliatti City Department of Internal Affairs, the Togliatti City Department of Health, the Togliatti Harm Reduction Project Coordination Group, and the following individuals: Elvira Zhukova; Veronica Petrova; Yuri Pevzner; Alexander Shakhov; and Adrian Renton.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Rhodes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rhodes, T., Platt, L., Sarang, A. et al. Street Policing, Injecting Drug Use and Harm Reduction in a Russian City: A Qualitative Study of Police Perspectives. JURH 83, 911–925 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9085-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9085-y

Keywords

Navigation