Abstract
This paper describes a framework for learning where learners undergo experimentations with the phenomena at hand according to progressive and staged goals. Bowling is used as a case study in this paper. The premise for experimentations is that learners can experience hidden efficacies, including the formation of “bad habits.” A distinction is made between productivity in learning and performance in terms of learning outcomes. In other words, productivity in learning may not necessarily manifest in successful performance, hence the term productive failure. To emphasize the need for self-regulation during problem-solving process, we discuss the movements within the productive–unproductive and success–failure dimensions through three-staged self-regulatory processes and draw implications to learning and instruction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (1996). Stolen knowledge. In H. McLellen (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives (pp. 47–56). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Cho, K. L., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50(3), 5–22.
Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38.
Hung, D., & Chen, D.-T. (2008). Learning within the worlds of reifications, selves, and phenomena: Expanding on the thinking of Vygotsky and Popper. Learning Inquiry, 2, 73–94.
Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and instruction, 26, 379–424.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Knowles, J. G., & Hoefler, V. B. (1989). The student teacher who wouldn’t go away: Learning from failure. Journal of Experiential Education, 12(2), 14–21.
Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognitive behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 101–128). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Roth, W. M. (1994). Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 197–223.
Rohrkemper, M., & Corno, L. (1988). Success and failure on classroom tasks: Adaptove learning and classroom teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 88(3), 296–312.
Schank, R., Berman, T., & Macpherson, K. (1999). Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (Vol II): A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 161–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan Publications.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Winne, P. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 397–410.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29–36.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Paulsen, A. S. (1995). Self-monitoring during collegiate studying: An invaluable tool for academic self-regulation. In P. Pintrich (Ed.), New directions in college teaching and learning: Understanding self-regulated learning (pp. 13–27). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hung, D., Chen, V. & Lim, S.H. Unpacking the hidden efficacies of learning in productive failure. Learn Inq 3, 1–19 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-008-0037-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-008-0037-1