Abstract
Experience in the workplace represents a significant domain for the analysis of learning. Based on many years of research on high-school and college interns, the article proposes a set of interdisciplinary ideas and strategies for conducting such an analysis. The core argument is that learning is the construction, enhancement or reorganization of knowledge and knowledge-use in an activity system, and that it happens through an interactional process involving participants, their joint actions and their material and informational resources. Understanding learning as a situated process requires an investigation of the way activities are established, accomplished, and processed, and of the social, cultural, political, and technological factors that shape them. The analyst must examine the ways knowledge is defined, distributed and used in the setting; learning, or the ways that knowledge-use changes over time; and pedagogy, or the social organization of the process by which learning is made possible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Applebaum, H. (1984). Work in market and industrial societies. Albany NY: SUNY Press.
Bailey, T. R., Hughes, K. H., & Moore, D. T. (2004). Working knowledge: Work-based learning and educational reform. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control: Volume 3: Towards a theory of educational transmission. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bruner, J. (1975). Beyond the information given. New York: Basic Books.
Chaiklin, S. (1993). Understanding the social scientific practice of Understanding Practice. In S. Chaiklin, J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 377–401). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cole, M., Hood, L., & McDermott, R.P. (1978). Ecological niche-picking: Ecological invalidity as an axiom in experimental cognitive psychology. Unpublished manuscript, The Rockefeller University.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum. (Originally published 1970.).
Goodenough, W. (1957). Cultural anthropology and linguistics. In P.L. Gavin, (Ed.), Report on the 7th annual roundtable meetings on linguistics and language study (Vol. 9, pp. 167–173). Georgetown University Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics. Washington DC: Georgetown University.
Hamada, T., & Sibley, W. E. (Eds.). (1994). Anthropological perspectives on organizational culture. Lanham MD: University Press of America.
Hutchins, E. (1993). Learning to navigate. In S. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 35–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
James, W. (1983). Talks to teachers and students about psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Keller, C., & Keller, J. D. (1993). Thinking and acting with iron. In S. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: perspectives on activity and context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moore, D. T. (1981). Discovering the pedagogy of experience. Harvard Educational Review, 51(2), 286–300.
Moore, D. T. (1986). Learning at work: Case studies in non-school education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 17(3), 166–184.
Moore, D.T. (2004). Curriculum at work: An educational perspective on the workplace as a learning environment. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(6), 325–340.
Moore, D. T. (2005a). Workplace learning and the micropolitics of knowledge. Paper presented at the Second Expert Meeting on the Learning Potential of the Workplace. University of Twente, The Netherlands, March 3–5, 2005. Also in W.J. Nijhof (Ed.), The learning potential of the workplace. Amsterdam: Nieman (in press).
Moore, D. T. (2005b). Teaching from practice: Pedagogies in experience-based programs. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Practice-Oriented Education (and the annual meeting of the World Association for Cooperative Education), Boston MA, June 17, 2005.
Piaget, J. (1967). Six psychological studies. New York: Random House.
Resnick, L. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. Resnick, J. M Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Simon, R. I., Dippo, D., & Schenke, A. (1991). Learning work: A critical pedagogy of work education. New York: Bergin and Garvey.
Stanton, T. (1981). Field study exercises. In L. Borzak (Ed.), Field study. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Wallace, A. F. B. (1970). Culture and personality. New York: Random House.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. (1991) Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, D.T. Analyzing learning at work: an interdisciplinary framework. Learn Inq 1, 175–188 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-007-0020-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11519-007-0020-2