Abstract
It often happens that at the end of Olympics games the medals won by more than one country are many and close in total number as in the 2008 games where China won 100 medals with many gold ones and the United States won 110 medals but with a lesser number of gold medals. The question is: Although it is often done arbitrarily, is there a way to quantify the values of gold, silver and bronze medals legitimately to resolve this concern? This short exposition shows that there is by using the author’s theory for the measurement of intangibles, the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernard, A.B. & Busse, M.R. (2000). Who wins the Olympic Games: economic development and medal total. NBER Working Paper No. 7998, Issued in November, 2000
Bialek, C. (2008). Who won the Olympics medal count? Let me count the ways. Available via DIALOG. http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/?s=olympi cs&x=13&y=10&paged=2. Cited August 25, 2008
Forsyth, S. (2008). China 2008 Olympic medal tally by population, and China 2008 Olympic medal tally by gross domestic product (GDP). Available via DIALOG. http://simon.forsyth.net/olympics.html
Saaty, T.L. (2004). Decision making - The analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13 (1): 1–35
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saaty, T.L. Who won the 2008 Olympics? A multicriteria decision of measuring intangibles. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 17, 473–486 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-008-5092-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-008-5092-8