Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Kalman filter-based approach to reduce the effects of geometric errors and the measurement noise in the inverse ECG problem

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we aimed to reduce the effects of geometric errors and measurement noise on the inverse problem of Electrocardiography (ECG) solutions. We used the Kalman filter to solve the inverse problem in terms of epicardial potential distributions. The geometric errors were introduced into the problem via wrong determination of the size and location of the heart in simulations. An error model, which is called the enhanced error model (EEM), was modified to be used in inverse problem of ECG to compensate for the geometric errors. In this model, the geometric errors are modeled as additive Gaussian noise and their noise variance is added to the measurement noise variance. The Kalman filter method includes a process noise component, whose variance should also be estimated along with the measurement noise. To estimate these two noise variances, two different algorithms were used: (1) an algorithm based on residuals, (2) expectation maximization algorithm. The results showed that it is important to use the correct noise variances to obtain accurate results. The geometric errors, if ignored in the inverse solution procedure, yielded incorrect epicardial potential distributions. However, even with a noise model as simple as the EEM, the solutions could be significantly improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aydin U, Serinagaoglu Y (2008) Use of activation time based Kalman filtering in inverse problem of ECG. In: Sloten JV, Verdonck P, Nyssen M, Haueisen J (eds) Proceedings of 4th European Conference International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering, vol 22. Antwerp, IFMBE, pp 1200–1203

  2. Aydin U, Serinagaoglu Y (2009) Statistical modeling of the geometric error in cardiac electrical imaging. In: Proceedings of The Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2009), Boston, pp 442–445

  3. Berrier KL, Sorensen DC, Khoury DS (2004) Solving the inverse problem of electrocardiography using a Duncan and Horn formulation of the Kalman filter. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:507–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks DH, Ahmad GF, Macleod RS, Maratos GM (1999) Inverse electrocardiography by simultaneous imposition of multiple constraints. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46(1):3–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng LK, Bradley CP, Pullan AJ (2003) Effects of experimental and modeling errors on electrocardiographic inverse formulations. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50:23–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Jakl J, Champagnat F, Goussard Y (1995) Time-space regularization of the inverse problem of electrocardiography. In: Proceedings of 17th Annual International Conference IEEE EMBS, Montreal, pp 213–214

  7. Ghanem RN, Ramanathan C, Jia P, Rudy Y (2003) Heart-surface reconstruction and ecg electrodes localization using fluoroscopy, epipolar geometry and stereovision: application to noninvasive imaging of cardiac electrical activity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22(10):1307–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghodrati A, Brooks DH, Tadmor G, MacLeod RS (2006) Wavefront-based models for inverse electrocardiography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(9):1821–1831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Greensite F (2003) The temporal prior in bioelectromagnetic source imaging problems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50(10):1152–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gulrajani RM (1998) The forward and inverse problems of electrocardiography. IEEE Eng Med Bio 17:84–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen PC, OLeary DP (1993) The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. SIAM J Sci Comput 14:1487–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. He B, Wu D (2001) Imaging and visualization of 3-D cardiac electrical activity. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 5(3):181–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. He B, Li G, Zhang X (2002) Noninvasive imaging of cardiac transmembrane potentials within three-dimensional myocardium by means of a realistic geometry anisotropic heart model. Phys Med Biol 47:4063–4078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heino J, Somersalo E, Kaipio JP (2005) Compensation for geometric mismodelling by anisotropies in optical tomography. Opt Express 13(1):296–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoekema R, Uijen GJH, van Erning L, van Oosterom A (1999) Interindividual variability of multilead electrocardiographic recordings: influence of heart position. J Electrocardiol 32(2):137–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huiskamp G, van Oosterom A (1989) Tailored versus realistic geometry in the inverse problem of electrocardiography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 36(8):827–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jazwinski AH, Bailie AE (1967) Adaptive filtering interim report, Report no. 67-6 Contract NAS 5-9085

  18. Jazwinski AH (2007) Stochastic processes and filtering theory, 2nd edn. Dover Publications, Mineola

  19. Jiang M, Xia L, Shou G, Tang M (2007) Combination of the LSQR method and a genetic algorithm for solving the electrocardiography inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 52:1277–1294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang Y, Farina D, Doessel O (2008) Effect of heart motion on the solutions of forward and inverse electrocardiographic problem - a simulation study. In: Murray A (ed) Proceedings of 35th Annual International Conference on Computers in Cardiology, vol 35. Bologna, pp 365–368

  21. Jiang M, Xia L, Shou G, Wei Q, Liu F, Crozier S (2009) Effect of cardiac motion on solution of the electrocardiography inverse problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56(4):923–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson CR, MacLeod RS (1994) Nonuniform spatial mesh adaptation using a posteriori error estimates: applications to forward and inverse problems. Appl Numer Math 14:311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnston PR, Gulrajani RM (1997) A new method for regularization parameter determination in the inverse problem of electrocardiography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44(1):19–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Joly D, Goussard Y, Savard P (1993) Time-recursive solution to the inverse problem of electrocardiography a model-based approach. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on IEEE EMBC and CMBEC, vol 15. New Jersey, pp 767–768

  25. Cheng LK, Sands GB, French RL, Withy SJ, Wong SP, Legget ME, Smith WM, Pullan AJ (2005) Rapid construction of a patient-specific torso model from 3D ultrasound for non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology. Med Biol Eng Comput 46(3):325–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaipio JP, Somersalo E (2004) Computational and statistical methods for inverse problems applied mathematical sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Macleod RS, Lux RL, Tacardi B (1997) A possible mechanism for electrocardiographically silent changes in cardiac repolarization. J Electrocardiol 30:114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Macleod RS, Ni O, Punske B, Ershler PR, Yilmaz B, Tacardi B (2000) Effects of heart position on the body-surface electrocardiogram. J Electrocardiol 33:229–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Macleod RS, Johnson CR (1997) Map3d: interactive scientific visualization for bioengineering data. In: Proceedings of EMBS 15th Annual International Conference, vol 44, pp 196–208

  30. Messinger-Rapport BJ, Rudy Y (1986) The inverse problem in electrocardiography: a model study of the effects of geometry and conductivity parameters on the reconstruction of epicardial potentials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 33(7):667–676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Okawa S, Honda S (2005) Reduction of noise from magnetoencephalography. Med Biol Eng Comput 43:630–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pullan AJ, Bradley CP (1996) A coupled cubic hermite finite element/boundary element procedure for electrocardiographic problems. Comput Mech 18(5):356–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pullan AJ, Paterson D, Greensite F (2001) Noninvasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 359:1277–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramanathan C, Rudy Y (2001) Electrocardiographic imaging: I. effect of torso inhomogeneities on body surface electrocardiographic potentials. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 12:229–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramanathan C, Rudy Y (2001) Electrocardiographic imaging: II. effect of torso inhomogeneities on noninvasive reconstruction of epicardial potentials, electrograms, and isochrones. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 12:241–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Serinagaoglu Y, Brooks DH, MacLeod RS (2006) Improved performance of Bayesian solutions for inverse electrocardiography using multiple information sources. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(10):2024–2034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shou G, Xia L, Jiang M, Wei Q, Liu F, Crozier S (2008) Truncated total least squares: a new regularization method for the solution of ECG inverse problems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(4):1327–1335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shumway RH, Stoffer DS (2006) Time series analysis and its applications: with R examples, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 330–345

  39. Stanley PC, Pilkington TC, Morrow MN (1986) The effects of thoracic inhomogeneities on the relationship between epicardial and torso potentials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 33(3):273–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Throne RD, Olson LG (1995) The effects of errors in assumed conductivities and geometry on numerical solutions to the inverse problem of electrocardiology. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 42(12):1192–1200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tikhonov AN, Arsenin VY (1977) Solution of ill-posed problems. Winston and Sons, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tsui CSL, Gan JQ, Roberts SJ (2009) A self-paced brain-computer interface for controlling a robot simulator: an online event labeling paradigm and an extended Kalman filter based algorithm for online training. Med Biol Eng Comput 47:257–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. van Oosterom A (1999) The use of spatial covariance in computing pericardial potentials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46(7):778–787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, grant number 105E070. The authors would like to thank Dr. Robert S. Macleod from University of Utah University of Utah, Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute for the data used in this study. This study was made possible in part by software (Map3d) from the NIH/NCRR Center for Integrative Biomedical Computing, P41-RR12553-10.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Middle East Technical University, 06531, Ankara, Turkey

    Umit Aydin & Yesim Serinagaoglu Dogrusoz

Authors
  1. Umit Aydin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yesim Serinagaoglu Dogrusoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umit Aydin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aydin, U., Dogrusoz, Y.S. A Kalman filter-based approach to reduce the effects of geometric errors and the measurement noise in the inverse ECG problem. Med Biol Eng Comput 49, 1003–1013 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0757-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0757-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation