Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulation of the plantar pressure distribution in the diabetic foot during the push-off stance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary objective of conservative care for the diabetic foot is to protect the foot from excessive pressures. Pressure reduction and redistribution may be achieved by designing and fabricating orthotic devices based on foot structure, tissue mechanics, and external loads on the diabetic foot. The purpose of this paper is to describe the process used for the development of patient-specific mathematical models of the second and third rays of the foot, their solution by the finite element method, and their sensitivity to model parameters and assumptions. We hypothesized that the least complex model to capture the pressure distribution in the region of the metatarsal heads would include the bony structure segmented as toe, metatarsal and support, with cartilage between the bones, plantar fascia and soft tissue. To check the hypothesis, several models were constructed with different levels of details. The process of numerical simulation is comprised of three constituent parts: model definition, numerical solution and prediction. In this paper the main considerations relating model selection and computation of approximate solutions by the finite element method are considered. The fit of forefoot plantar pressures estimated using the FEA models and those explicitly tested were good as evidenced by high Pearson correlations (r = 0.70–0.98) and small bias and dispersion. We concluded that incorporating bone support, metatarsal and toes with linear material properties, tendon and fascia with linear material properties, soft tissue with nonlinear material properties, is sufficient for the determination of the pressure distribution in the metatarsal head region in the push-off position, both barefoot and with shoe and total contact insert. Patient-specific examples are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

DOF:

Degrees of freedom

FEA:

Finite element analysis

FEM:

Finite element method

SXCT:

Spiral X-ray computed tomography

TCI:

Total contact insert

References

  1. Boulton A, Betts R, Franks C et al (1987) Abnormalities of foot pressure in early diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 4:225–228

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pecoraro R, Reiber G, Burgess EM (1990) Pathways to diabetic limb amputation. Basis for prevention. Diabet Care 13(5):513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Edmonds M, Blundell M, Morris M et al (1986) Improved survival of the diabetic foot: the role of a specialized foot clinic. Q J Med 60(232):763–771

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chantelau E, Haage P (1994) An audit of cushioned diabetic footwear: relation to patient compliance. Diabet Med 11(1):114–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mueller M, Diamond J, Sinacore D et al (1989) Total contact casting in treatment of diabetic plantar ulcers. Controlled clinical trial. Diabetes Care 12(6):384–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinacore D (1996) Total contact casting for diabetic neuropathic ulcers. Phys Ther 76:296–301

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brand P (1983) The diabetic foot. In: Ellenberg M, Rifkin H (eds) Diabetes mellitus: theory and practice. Medical Examimation Publishing, New Hyde Park, pp 829–849

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ctercteko G, Dhanendran M, Hutton W, Le Quesne L (1981) Vertical forces acting on the feet of diabetic patients with neuropathic ulceration. Br J Surg 68(9):608–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mueller M, Hastings M, Commean P et al (2003) Forefoot structural predictors of plantar pressures during walking in people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy. J Biomech 36:1009–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holewski J, Moss K, Stess R et al (1989) Prevalence of foot pathology and lower extremity complications in a diabetic outpatient clinic. J Rehabil Res Dev 26: 35–44

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gefen A (2003) Plantar soft tissue loading under the medial metatarsals in the standing diabetic foot. Med Eng Phys 25:491–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lemmon D, Shiang TY, Hashmi A, Ulbrecht JS, Cavanagh PR (1997) The effect of insoles in therapeutic footwear–a finite element approach. J Biomech 30:615–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lemmon DR, Cavanagh PR (1997) Finite element modeling of plantar pressure beneath the second ray with flexor muscle loading. Clin Biomech 12 (13)

  14. Gefen A, Megido-Ravid M, Itzchak Y, Arcan M (2000) Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional foot structure during gait: a basic tool for clinical applications. J Biomech Eng 122:630–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas VJ, Patil KM, Radhakrishnan S (2004) Three-dimensional stress analysis for the mechanics of plantar ulcers in diabetic neuropathy. Med Biol Eng Comput 42:230–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen WP, Tang FT, Ju CW (2001) Stress distribution of the foot during mid-stance to push-off in barefoot gate: a 3-D finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 16:614–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheung JT, Zhang M (2005) A 3dimensional finite element model of the human foot and ankle for insole design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Szabo BA, Babuska I (1991) Finite element analysis. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Commean PK, Mueller MJ, Smith KE, Hastings M, Klaesner J, Pilgram T, Robertson DD (2002) Reliability and validity for combined imaging and pressure assessment methods for diabetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83(4):497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Commean PK, Mueller MJ, Smith KE, Hastings M, Klaesner J, Pilgram T, Robertson DD (2002) Reliability and validity of combined imaging and pressures assessment methods for diabetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly VE, Mueller MJ, Sinacore DR (2000) Timing of peak plantar pressure during the stance phase of walking. A study of patients with diabetes mellitus and transmetatarsal amputation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 90:18–23

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robb RA, Barillot C (1989) Interactive display and analysis of 3-D medical images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 8(3):217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mueller MJ, Strube MJ (1996) Generalizability of in-shoe peak pressure measures using the F-scan system. Clin Biomech 11:159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hastings MK, Commean PK, Smith KE, Pilgram TK, Mueller MJ (2003) Aligning anatomical structure from spiral X-ray computed tomography with plantar pressure data. Clin Biomech 18:877–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jacob S, Patil MK (1999) Stress analysis in three-dimensional foot models of normal and diabetic neuropathy. Front Med Biol Eng 9:211–227

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yamada H (1970) Strength of biological materials. William & Wilkins Company, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gefen A (2003) The in vivo elastic properties of the plantar fascia during the contact phase of walking. Foot Ankle Int 24:238–244

    Google Scholar 

  28. Klaesner JW, Commean PK, Hastings MK, Zou D, Mueller MJ (2001) Accuracy and reliability testing of a portable soft tissue indentor. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 9:232–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. StressCheck V7.0, Advanced topics guide, ESRD, Inc., St. Louis, MO, 2005

  30. Gefen A (2001) Stress analysis of the standing foot following surgical fascia release. J Biomech 35:629–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jacob S, Patil MK (1999) Three-dimensional foot modeling and analysis of stresses in normal and early stage Hansen’s disease with muscle paralysis. J Rehabil Res Dev 36:252–263

    Google Scholar 

  32. D’Andrea SE, Thompson D, Cao D, Davis B (1999) Finite element modeling of load transmission through the Calcaneus. 23rd annual meeting of the American Society of Biomechanics. Pittsburgh

  33. Klaesner JW, Hastings MK, Zou D, Lewis C, Mueller MJ (2002) Plantar tissue stiffness in patients with diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:1796–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet i: 307–310

    Google Scholar 

  35. Erdemir A, Saucerman JJ, Lemon D, Loppnow B, Turso B, Ulbretch JS, Cavanagh PR (2005) Local pressure relief in therapeutic footwear: design guidelines from finite element models. J Biomech 38:1798–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge funding from NCMRR, NIH, RO1 HD 36895. We also acknowledge the Prevention and Control Research Core of the Washington University Diabetes Research and Training Center (P60 DK 20579) for their assistance in subject recruitment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo L. Actis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Actis, R.L., Ventura, L.B., Smith, K.E. et al. Numerical simulation of the plantar pressure distribution in the diabetic foot during the push-off stance. Med Bio Eng Comput 44, 653–663 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0078-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0078-5

Keywords

Navigation