Abstract
Either objective or subjective social status is linked with subjective well-being (SWB) in a variety of ways. However, the exact mechanism underlying this relationship remains unknown. The present study investigates whether future time perspective (FTP) mediates the linkage of social status and SWB. A total of 3937 Chinese adults (M = 34.68 years; SD = 9.67) participated in the study. Pearson correlation analysis indicated the positive correlations between social status, FTP, and SWB. Stepwise regression showed that objective social status had a weakly linear effect on SWB, and subjective social status was more closely related to SWB than objective social status. The structural equation model showed that FTP functioned as a mediator in the relations between objective/subjective social status and SWB, which indicated that people with a higher objective and subjective status had high scores on FTP and those concentrated on future reported greater SWB. Overall, our findings do support the mediating effect of FTP in explaining the associations of two forms of social status and well-being. Implications of these results for understanding the connection among study variables were discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
References
Adams, J., & Nettle, D. (2009). Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass, and physical activity: An empirical study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X299664
Adler, N., Singh-Manoux, A., Schwartz, J., Stewart, J., Matthews, K., & Marmot, M. G. (2008). Social status and health: A comparison of British civil servants in Whitehall-II with European-and African-Americans in CARDIA. Social Science and Medicine, 66(5), 1034–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.031
Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
Alwin, D. F., & Wray, L. A. (2005). A life-span developmental perspective on social status and health. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(2), S7–S14. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.special_issue_2.s7
Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 23(7), 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434537
Barber, L. K., Munz, D. C., Bagsby, P. G., & Grawitch, M. J. (2009). When does time perspective matter? Self-control as a moderator between time perspective and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 250–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.007
Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Linley, P. A., & Ivanchenko, G. V. (2010). A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903271181
Bryant, F. (2003). Savoring beliefs inventory (SBI): A scale for measuring beliefs about savouring. Journal of Mental Health, 12(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963823031000103489
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation.
Chen, Y., & Williams, M. (2016). Subjective well-being in the new China: Religion, social capital, and social status: Subjective well-being in the new China. British Journal of Sociology, 67(4), 719–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12232
Chua, L. W., Milfont, T. L., & Jose, P. E. (2015). Coping skills help explain how future-oriented adolescents accrue greater well-being over time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(11), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0230-8
Cundiff, J. M., & Matthews, K. A. (2017). Is subjective social status a unique correlate of physical health? A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 36(12), 1109–1125. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000534
Cunningham, K. F., Zhang, J. W., & Howell, R. T. (2015). Time perspectives and subjective well-being: A dual-pathway framework. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. van Beek (Eds.), Time perspective theory; review, Research and Application. Springer Cham.
Curhan, K. B., Levine, C. S., Markus, H. R., Kitayama, S., Park, J., Karasawa, M., et al. (2014). Subjective and objective hierarchies and their relations to psychological well-being: A U.S./Japan comparison. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(8), 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614538461
Demakakos, P., Nazroo, J., Breeze, E., & Marmot, M. (2008). Socioeconomic status and health: The role of subjective social status. Social Science and Medicine, 67(2), 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.038
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., et al. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28(3), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079018
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001
Easterlin, R. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 27, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-B
Euteneuer, F., Schäfer, S. J., Neubert, M., Rief, W., & Süssenbach, P. (2021). Subjective social status and health-related quality of life—A cross-lagged panel analysis. Health Psychology, 40(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001051
Ferrari, L., Nota, L., & Soresi, S. (2010). Time perspective and indecision in young and older adolescents. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 38(1), 61–82.
Fieulaine, N., & Apostolidis, T. (2015). Precariousness as a time horizon: How poverty and social insecurity shape individuals’ time perspectives. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. van Beek (Eds.), Time perspective theory; review, Research and Application. Springer Cham.
Fischer, R., & Boer, D. (2011). What is more important for national well-being: Money or autonomy? A meta-analysis of well-being, burnout, and anxiety across 63 societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023663
Goldman, N., Cornman, J. C., & Chang, M. (2006). Measuring subjective social status: A case study of older Taiwanese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 21(1–2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-006-9020-4
Gore, J. S. (2018). Standing on shaky ground and living in the now: How resource amount and stability influence time perspectives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(7), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12520
Haught, H. M., Rose, J., Geers, A., & Brown, J. A. (2015). Subjective social status and well-being: The role of referent abstraction. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155(4), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1015476
Haushofer, J., & Fehr, E. (2014). On the psychology of poverty. Science, 344, 862–867. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232491
Hicks, J. A., Trent, J., Davis, W. E., & King, L. A. (2012). Positive affect, meaning in life, and future time perspective: An application of socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023965
Howell, R. T., & Howell, C. J. (2008). The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries:A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 536–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.536
Jackson, B., Richman, L. S., LaBelle, O., Lempereur, M. S., & Twenge, J. M. (2015). Experimental evidence that low social status is most toxic to well-being when internalized. Self and Identity, 14(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.965732
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.410
Kooij, D. T., Kanfer, R., Betts, M., & Rudolph, C. W. (2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 867–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000306
Li, X., Wang, C. Lyu, H., Worrell, F.C., & Mello, Z. R. (under review). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Scale.
Lu, M., Li, A. Y., Fung, H. H., Rothermund, K., & Lang, F. R. (2018). Different future time perspectives interplay in predicting life satisfaction. GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 31(3), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000192
Lu, X. (2002). Contemporary China social class research report. Social Sciences Academic Press (China).
Lyu, H., & Huang, X. (2016). Development and validation of future time perspective scale for adolescents and young adults. Time and Society, 25(3), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X16662669
Mahadevan, N., Gregg, A. P., & Sedikides, C. (2021). Self-esteem as a hierometer: Sociometric status is a more potent and proximate predictor of self-esteem than socioeconomic status. Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001056
Marsh, H., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
Matthews, K. A., Gallo, L. C., & Taylor, S. E. (2010). Are psychosocial factors mediators of socioeconomic status and health connections? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186, 146–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05332.x
Padawer, E. A., Jacobs-Lawson, J. M., Hershey, D. A., & Thomas, D. G. (2007). Demographic indicators as predictors of future time perspective. Current Psychology, 26(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-007-9008-4
Pickett, K. E., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2015). Income inequality and health: A causal review. Social Science and Medicine, 128, 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.031
Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15(2), 187–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.187
Prenda, K. M., & Lachman, M. E. (2001). Planning for the future: A life management strategy for increasing control and life satisfaction in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 16(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.206
Richards, L., & Paskov, M. (2016). Social class, employment status and inequality in psychological well-being in the UK: Cross-sectional and fixed effects analyses over two decades. Social Science and Medicine, 167, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.042
Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001
Singh-Manoux, A., Marmot, M. G., & Adler, N. E. (2005). Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status? Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(6), 855–861. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000188434.52941.a0
Smith, L. (2013). So close and yet so far away: Social class, social exclusion, and mental health practice. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 83(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajop.12008
Tan, J. J. X., Kraus, M. W., Carpenter, N. C., & Adler, N. E. (2020). The association between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(11), 970–1020. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000258
Tasdemir-ozdes, A., Stricklandhughes, C. M., Bluck, S., & Ebner, N. C. (2016). Future perspective and healthy lifestyle choices in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 31(6), 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000089
Wallace, C. J. (1986). Functional assessment in rehabilitation. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 12(4), 604–630. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/12.4.604
Wang, C. (2016). Time perspective: The revision of the inventory and the influence on risky driving behavior (Master’s thesis). Southwest University.
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2009). Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115926
Yoshikawa, H., Aber, J. L., & Beardslee, W. R. (2012). The effects of poverty on the mental, emotional, and behavioral health of children and youth: Implications for prevention. American Psychologist, 67(4), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028015
Zell, E., Strickhouser, J. E., & Krizan, Z. (2018). Subjective social status and health: A meta-analysis of community and society ladders. Health Psychology, 37(10), 979–987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000667.
Zhang, J. W., & Howell, R. T. (2011). Do time perspectives predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond personality traits? Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1261–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.021
Zhao, W. (2012). Economic inequality, status perceptions, and subjective well-being in China's transitional economy. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(4), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.07.001
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
Funding
This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU1909027), the Chongqing Humanities and Social Science Key Research Base Project (18SKB02), the Key project of Chongqing Social science Planning (2021NDZD09), and the Chongqing education science “14th five-year plan” key project (2021-GX-003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Lyu Houchao and Li Xiaobao. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Li Xiaobao and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Statement
This study was approved by the ethics committee of Faculty of Psychology at Southwest University. The participants signed an informed consent form stating the aim of the study and explaining that they could withdraw from the study, and the data would be anonymous.
Conflict of Interest
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Xiaobao Li and Houchao Lyu are co-first authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Lyu, H. Social Status and Subjective Well-Being in Chinese Adults: Mediating Effect of Future Time Perspective. Applied Research Quality Life 17, 2101–2116 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-10026-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-10026-8