Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Good Societies, Financial Inequality and Secrecy, and a Good Life: from Aristotle to Piketty

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we show that for a dataset of 105 countries, four candidate objective indexes (Human Development Index (HDI), Weighted Index of Social Progress (WISP), Social Progress Index (SPI) and Sustainable Society Index (SSI)) and one subjective index (World Happiness Survey (WHS)) of at least aspects of the quality of life or human well-being have good convergent validity among themselves and expected statistically significant negative correlations with Gini measures of wealth and income, and a measure of political jurisdictions’ institutionalized financial secrecy (Financial Secrecy Scores (FSS)). A measure of offshore wealth as a fraction of GDP (FOW) showed only a couple significant correlations with one overall quality of life index (SSI). When we combined the four objective indexes to the subjective index to create overall measures of the quality of life (including Happy Life Years (HLY)), the correlations among the indexes increased. Most of the correlations increased again when we used Gini indexes to create wealth-equality overall quality of life indexes and these correlations were higher on average than those among income-equality overall quality of life indexes. Combining results using 21 quality of life/well-being indexes, we rank ordered 105 countries from best to worst. The top 10 in order were Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Australia, Finland, Netherlands, Slovakia, Belgium, Sweden and Denmark. This is the first time anyone has built the array of index options presented here based on a handful of originals. We offer them as another potential starting point for the next generation of researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alstadsæter, A., Johannesen, N. & Zucman, G. (2017). Who owns the wealth in tax havens? Macro evidence and implications for global inequality. Working paper 23805, http://www.nber.org/papers/w23805. Cambridge: National Bureau of economic research, September.

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1983). Social justice and public policy. In Brighton: Wheatsheaf and Cambridge. Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boushey, H. (2017). A feminist interpretation of patrimonial capitalism. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.355-411). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University press.

  • Boushey, H., Delong, J. B., & Steinbaum, M. (Eds.). (2017). After Piketty: The agenda for economics and inequality. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Presss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobham, A., Jansky, P., & Meinzer, M. (2015). The financial secrecy index: Shedding new light on the geography of secrecy. Economic Geography, 91, 281–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Credit Suisse. (2016). Global Wealth Data Book 2016. Pp.106-109. Zurich: Credit Suisse research institute. (credit-suisse.com).

  • Delsol, J.-P., Lecaussin, N., & Martin, E. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-Piketty: Capital for the 21stcentury. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneault, A. (2015). Canada: A New Tax Haven. How the country that shaped Caribbean Offshore Jurisdictions is Becoming One Itself. (translated by Catherine Browne). Vancouver: Talonbooks.

  • Derenoncourt, E. (2017). The historical origins of global inequality. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.491-511). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University press.

  • Diener, E., Helliwell, J. F., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2010). International differences in well-being. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, A. G. (2002). Revisiting UNDP’s GDI and gem: Towards an alternative. Social Indicators Research, 57, 301–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, R. J. (1984). The social progress of nations. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, R. J. (2015). The index of social Progress: Objective approaches. In W. Glatzer, L. Camfield, V. Møller, & M. Rojas (Eds.), Global handbook of quality of life (pp. 159–205). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, R. J. (2017). Personal correspondence. October, 10, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrant, G. (2014). The multidimensional gender inequalities index (MGII): A descriptive analysis of gender inequalities using MCA. Social Indicators Research, 115, 653–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichtner, J. (2014). Privateers of the Caribbean: The hedge funds=US-UK-offshore nexus. Competition and Change, 18, 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. and Sen, A. (1997). Annex: ‘On Economic Inequality” after a quarter century. In A. Sen, On economic inequality (pp. 107–251), Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Gallup-Healthways. (2014). State of Global Well-Being 2014 Country Well-Being Rankings. (http://www.well-beingindex.com/2014-global-report). Pp.5–7.

  • Garcia-Bernardo, J., Takes, J. F. W., & Heemskerk, E. M. (2017). Uncovering offshore financial centers: Conduits and sinks in the global corporate ownership network. Scientific Reports, 7, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatzer, W., & Gulyas, J. (2014). Cantril self-anchoring striving scale. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 509–511). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Forum. (2016). Tax transparency 2016: Report on Progress. Paris: OECD Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, D.S. (2017). The legal constitution of capitalism. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.471-490). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University press.

  • Guillen-Royo, M., Velaszco, J., & Camfield, L. (2013). Basic needs and wealth as independent determinants of happiness: An illustration from Thailand. Social Indicators Research, 110, 517–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., Sharpe, A., Sirgy, J., & Vogel, J. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K., & Hepburn, C. (2014). Wealth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wooden, M. (2008). Money does not buy happiness: Or does it? A reassessment based on the combined effects of wealth, income and consumption. Social Indicators Research, 87, 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J.F. and Wang, S. (2012). The state of world happiness. Chapter 2 in J. Helliwell, R. Layard & J. Sachs (Eds.), World Happiness Report. (pp.10-57). New York: The Earth Institute, Columbia University.

  • Helliwell, J.F., Huang, H. & Wang, S. (2016). Statistical Appendix for “The Distribution of World Happiness”, Chapter 2, World Happiness Report, Update 2016. Worldhappiness.report/. . ./2/2016/03/Statistical Appendix. Pp.15–17.

  • Hochman, O., & Skopek, N. (2013). The impact of wealth on subjective well-being: A comparison of three welfare-state regimes. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 34, 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • IISD. (2009). BellagioStamp: Sustainability assessment and measurement principles. Winnipeg, Manitoba: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, E. (2017). Everywhere and nowhere: Politics in Capital in the Twenty-First Century. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.512-540). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University press.

  • Jones, G. (2017). The geographies of Capital in the Twenty-First Century: Inequality, political economy, and space. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.280-303). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  • Kovacevic, M. (2010). Measurement of inequality in human development – A review. In Human development research paper 2010/35. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2017). Why we’re in a new gilded age. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.60-71). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University press.

  • Lakner, C. (2017). Global inequality. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.259-279). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University press.

  • Land, K.C. (2017). Piketty, reactions to Piketty, and explaining the takeoff of supermanager remuneration. Social Indicators Network News (SINET), numbers 131-132 (spring, summer, may, august, pp.1-7.

  • Land, K. C., & Michalos, A. C. (2017). Fifty years after the social indicators movement: Has the promise been fulfilled? Social Indicators Research online., 135, 835–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1571-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1970). Cost-benefit versus expected utility acceptance rules. Theory and Decision, 1, 61–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1978). Foundations of decision-making. Ottawa: Canadian Library of Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A.C. (1980a). North American social report, Vol.1: Foundations, Population and Health. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

  • Michalos, A.C. (1980b). North American social report, Vol.2: Crime, Justice and Politics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

  • Michalos, A.C. (1981a). North American social report, Vol.3: Science, Education and Recreation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

  • Michalos, A.C. (1981b). North American social report, Vol.4: Environment, Transportation and Housing. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

  • Michalos, A.C. (1982). North American social report, Vol.5: Economics, Religion and Morality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

  • Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1986). An application of multiple discrepancies theory to seniors. Social Indicators Research, 18, 349–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1988). A case for a progressive annual net wealth tax. Public Affairs Quarterly, 2, 105–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A.C. (1991a). Global report on student well-being, Vol. 1: Life Satisfaction and Happiness. Springer-Verlag.

  • Michalos, A.C. (1991b). Global report on student well-being, Vol. 2: Family, Friends, Living Partner and Self-Esteem. Springer-Verlag.

  • Michalos, A.C. (1993a). Global Report on Student Well-Being, Vol. 3: Employment, Finances, Housing and Transportation. Springer-Verlag.

  • Michalos, A.C. (1993b). Global report on student well-being, Vol. 4: Religion, Education, Recreation and Health. Springer-Verlag.

  • Michalos, A. C. (1995). A pragmatic approach to business ethics. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A.C. (1997a). Good taxes: The case for taxing foreign currency exchange and other financial transactions. Science for Peace and Dundern Press.

  • Michalos, A. C. (1997b). Combining social, economic and environmental indicators to measure sustainable human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 40, 221–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A.C. (2006). Logic, philosophy of science and the quality of life. In philosophy and world problems, John McMurtry (Ed.) the encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS), developed under the auspices of the UNESCO, Eolss publishers, Paris, France (http://www.eolss.net).

  • Michalos, A. C. (2011). What did Stiglitz, Sen and Fitoussi get right and what did they get wrong? Social Indicators Research, 102, 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (2014a). Quality of life, two variable theory. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 5307–5309). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (2014b). Subjective indicators. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6427–6429). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (2015). Ancient views on the quality of life. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A.C. (2017). Milestones of quality of life research in Canada. In a.C. Michalos, Connecting the Quality of Life Theory to Health, Well-Being and Education: The Selected Works of Alex C. Michalos (pp. 347-396). Cham, Switzerland: Springer international publishing.

  • Michalos, A. C., & Land, K. C. (2017). Replies to our commentators. Social Indicators Research online., 135, 1057–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1550-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., Smale, B., Labonté, R., Muhajarine, N., Scott, K., Guhn, M., Gadermann, A. M., Zumbo, B. D., Morgan, A., Moore, K., Swystun, L., Holden, B., Bernardin, H., Dunning, B., Graham, P., Brooker, A. S., & Hyman, I. (2011). The Canadian index of wellbeing: Technical report 1.0. Waterloo: Canadian Index of Wellbeing and University of Waterloo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., Kahlke, P. M., Rempel, K., Lounatvuori, A., MacDiarmid, A., Creecj, H., & Buckler, C. (2015). Progress in measuring knowledge, attitudes and behaviours concerning sustainable development among tenth grade students in Manitoba. Social Indicators Research, 123, 303–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (2017). Increasing capital income share and its effect on personal income inequality. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.235-258). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  • Mullis, R. J. (1992). Measures of economic well-being as predictors of psychological well-being. Social Indicators Research, 26, 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidu, S. (2017). A political economy take on W/Y. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.99-125). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University press.

  • Nielsen, E.R. (2017). Human capital and wealth before and after Capital in the Twenty-First Century. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.150-169). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University press.

  • Orr, A. J. (2003). Black-white differences in achievement: The importance of wealth. Sociology of Education, 76, 281–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Permanyer, I. (2013). Are UNDP indices appropriate to capture gender inequalities in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 110, 927–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century (translated by Arthur Goldhammer). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2017). Toward a reconciliation between economics and the social sciences: Lessons from Capital in the Twenty-First Century. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp. 543-565). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University press.

  • Porter, M. E., Stern, S., & Green, M. (2016). Social Progress index 2016: Executive summary. Social Progress Imperative: Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1973). On economic inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaxson N (2011) Treasure Islands: Uncovering the Damage of Offshore Banking and Tax Havens. St. Martin’s Press, New York.

  • Solow, R.M. (2017). Thomas Piketty is right. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.48-59). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University press.

  • Steinbaum, M.I. (2017). Inequality and the rise of social democracy: An ideological history. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.439-470). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University press.

  • Tax Justice Network (2016a). Financial secrecy index 2015: Methodology. Financialsecrecyindex.com/PDF/FSI-Methodology.pdf.

  • Tax Justice Network (2016b). The Financial Secrecy Index Review 2016: Report on the Stakeholder Survey. Taxjustice.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/TJN2016_FSI-Survey-Report.pdf.

  • Tyson, L. and Spence, M. (2017). Exploring the effects of technology on income and wealth inequality. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong & M. Steinbaum (EDS.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality (pp.170-208). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University press.

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1990). Human development report. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2016). Human Development Report. (2016 HDR Report (/en/2016-report)).

  • van de Kerk, G. (2014). Sustainable society index, tool for measuring well-being. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6516–6525). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Kerk, J.F. and Manuel, A. (2017). Sustainable Society Index (www.ssfindex.com) data tables.

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). Happy life-expectancy: A comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations. Social Indicators Research, 39, 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2014). Happiness adjusted life years. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 2641–2643). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucman, G. (2013). The missing wealth of nations: Are Europe and the US net debtors or net creditors? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(3), 1321–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucman, G. (2015). The hidden wealth of nations: The scourge of tax havens. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex C. Michalos.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Written for the Keynote Address at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Quality of Life Studies in Hong Kong, June 2018.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Appendix 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michalos, A.C., Hatch, P.M. Good Societies, Financial Inequality and Secrecy, and a Good Life: from Aristotle to Piketty. Applied Research Quality Life 15, 1005–1054 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09717-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09717-0

Keywords

Navigation