Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Review of Character Strengths Interventions in Twenty-First-Century Schools: their Importance and How they can be Fostered

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A main challenge of educational organizations is how to foster students’ capacity to fulfill their potential. The present paper, based on educational, psychological, and organizational research, asserts that a discussion of character strengths and their development is highly relevant to this challenge. It provides an integrative overview of the relevance of character strengths to twenty-first-century schools and discusses different mechanisms that can help foster them. Character strengths—widely valued positive traits, theorized to be the basis for optimal functioning and well-being—may derive from inner tendencies, but are expected to have broad potential for development, depending on individuals’ experiences and environments. Furthermore, character strengths are closely related to twenty-first-century competencies – cognitive, interpersonal and intrapersonal competencies, identified by the American National Research Council as required for thriving in contemporary life and work, and thus considered to be desirable educational outcomes. The paper first delineates the connections between twenty-first-century competencies and character strengths, demonstrating the importance of promoting them in education. Then, mechanisms for fostering development of character strengths in schools are discussed, based on a review of the literature, including mechanisms that affect students (e.g., curriculum, relationships), teachers (e.g., training, supervisors), and schools (e.g., evaluation processes, resource allocation), while considering the interplay between these different levels. The concluding part of the paper outlines an integrative model of an optimal school system, expected to foster character strengths’ use and development and discuss its applications for research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (2003). On sustainability of project innovations as systemic change. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allender, J. S. (2001). Teacher self: The practice of humanistic education. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almog, S., & Perry-Hazan, L. (2012). Conceptualizing the right of children to adaptable education. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 20(4), 486–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alzina, R. B., & Paniello, S. H. (2017). Positive psychology, emotional education, and the happy classrooms program. Papeles del Psicólogo, 38(1), 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of educational Research, 64(2), 287-309.

  • Bates-Krakoff, J., McGrath, R. E., Graves, K., & Ochs, L. (2017). Beyond a deficit model of strengths training in schools: Teaching targeted strength use to gifted students. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 102–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2005). What works in character education: A research-driven guide for educators. Washington: Character Education Partnership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2007). What works in character education. Journal of Research in Character Education, 5(1), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. (2010). Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21). A Network of Battelle for Kids.

  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay, 20–24.

  • Bowlby, J. (2005). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory (Vol. 393). Taylor & Francis.

  • Brown, P., Corrigan, M. W., & Higgins-D'Alessandro, A. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of prosocial education (Vol. 1). Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Ciarrochi, J., Atkins, P. W. B., Hayes, L. L., Sahdra, B. K., & Parker, P. (2016). Contextual positive psychology: Policy recommendations for implementing positive psychology into schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, D. O., & Harter, J. K. (2003). Investing in strengths. In Cameron, K., & Dutton, J. (Eds.). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. Berrett-Koehler Publishers (pp. 111-121).

  • Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., James, J. B., & Hart, D. (Eds.). (1998). Competence and character through life. University of Chicago Press. Coburn, 2003.

  • Consort (2010). Checklist of information to include when reporting a randomized trial. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/CONSORT-2010-Checklist.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2018.

  • Convention on the Right of the Child (1989). U.N. Doc. A/RES/44/25.

  • Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freidlin, P., Littman-Ovadia, H., & Niemiec, R. M. (2017). Positive psychopathology: Social anxiety via character strengths underuse and overuse. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 50–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2002). The change. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2013). Strength-based positive interventions: Further evidence for their potential in enhancing well-being and alleviating depression. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1241–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghielen, S. T. S., van Woerkom, M., & Christina Meyers, M. (2017). Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions: A literature review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1365164.

  • Gillham, J., Adams-Deutsch, Z., Werner, J., Reivich, K., Coulter-Heindl, V., Linkins, M., et al. (2011). Character strengths predict subjective well-being during adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillham, J.E., Abenavoli, R.M., Brunwasser, S.M., Linkins, M., Reivich, K. J., & Seligman M.E.P. (2014). Resilience education. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of happiness. Oxford University Press.

  • Hammersley, M. (Ed.). (2007). Educational research and evidence-based practice. Sage.

  • Han, S. S., & Weiss, B. (2005). Sustainability of teacher implementation of school-based mental health programs. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(6), 665–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harzer, C. (2016). The eudaimonics of human strengths: The relations between character strengths and well-being. In Vittersø, J. (Ed.) Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being (pp. 307–322). Springer International Publishing.

  • Ho, S. M., Mak, C. W., Ching, R., & Lo, E. T. (2017). An approach to motivation and empowerment: The application of positive psychology. In I. H. Amzat & N. P. Valdez (Eds.), Teacher Empowerment toward Professional Development and Practices (pp. 167–182). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration. Theory, research and Practice (9th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, M. L. P. (2017). Perseverance, achievement, and positive education. In M. A. White, G. R. Slemp, & A. S. Murray (Eds.), Future Directions in Well-Being (pp. 75–79). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

  • Korthagen, F. A. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2013). Virtues and vices in positive psychology. Cambridge University Press.

  • Lavy, S., & Littman-Ovadia, H. (2017). My better self: Using strengths at work and work productivity, organizational citizenship behavior, and satisfaction. Journal of Career Development, 44(2), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, S., Littman-Ovadia, H., & Bareli, Y. (2014). Strengths deployment as a mood-repair mechanism: Evidence from a diary study with a relationship exercise group. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(6), 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, S., Littman Ovadia, H., & Bareli, Y. (2016). My better half: Strengths endorsement and deployment in married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 37, 1730–1745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14550365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, S., Littman-Ovadia, H., & Boiman-Meshita, M. (2017). The wind beneath my wings: Effects of social support on daily use of character strengths at work. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(4), 703–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledertoug, M. M. (2016). Strengths-based learning – Children’s Character Strengths as a means to their learning potential. PhD thesis, Submitted to DPU/Aarhus University, Denmark.

  • Lickona, T., Schaps, E., & Lewis, C. (2007). CEP's Eleven Principles of Effective Character Education. Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership.

  • Linkins, M., Niemiec, R. M., Gillham, J., & Mayerson, D. (2015). Through the lens of strength: A framework for educating the heart. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 64–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littman-Ovadia, H., & Lavy, S. (2012). Differential ratings and associations with well-being of character strengths in two communities. Health Sociology Review, 21(3), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littman-Ovadia, H., Lavy, S., & Boiman-Meshita, M. (2017). When theory and research collide: Examining correlates of signature strengths use at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(2), 527–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lottman, T. J., Zawaly, S., & Niemiec, R. (2017). Well-being and well-doing: Bringing mindfulness and character strengths to the early childhood classroom and home. In Positive Psychology Interventions in Practice (pp. 83-105). Springer International Publishing.

  • Madden, W., Green, S., & Grant, A. M. (2011). A pilot study evaluating strengths-based coaching for primary school students: Enhancing engagement and hope. International Coaching Psychology Review, 6(1), 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1968). Some educational implications of the humanistic psychologies. Harvard Educational Review, 38(4), 685–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E. (2015). Character strengths in 75 nations: An update. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Mitra, D. (2001). Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper, going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 2(4), 301–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F. A., & Vasalos, A. (2009). Supporting presence in teacher education: The connection between the personal and professional aspects of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourshed, M., Patel, J., & Suder, K. (2014). Education to employment: Getting Europe’s youth into work. McKinsey & Company.

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills, J.W. Pellegrino and M.L. Hilton, Editors. Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

  • Niemiec, R. M. (2013). VIA character strengths: Research and practice (the first 10 years). In Knoop, H. H., & Delle Fave, A. (Eds.) Well-being and cultures (pp. 11–29). Springer Netherlands.

  • Noddings, N. (2015). The challenge to Care in Schools, 2nd Edition. Teachers College Press.

  • O’Connor, M., & Cameron, G. (2017). The Geelong grammar positive psychology experience. In E. Frydenberg, A. J. Martin, & R. J. Collie (Eds.), Social and Emotional Learning in Australia and the Asia-Pacific (pp. 353–370). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, M. F., Fialkov, C., Ecker, B., & Portnoy, S. (2014). Teaching to strengths: Character education for urban middle school students. Journal of Research in Character Education, 10(2), 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pala, A. (2011). The need for character education. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 3(2), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. (1998). The courage to teach. San Francisco: Josey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006a). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 891–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006b). Character strengths and happiness among young children: Content analysis of parental descriptions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2009). Strengths of character in schools. In Furlong, M. J., Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (Eds.). Handbook of positive psychology in schools, Routledge, pp. 65–76.

  • Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Hazan, L. (2015). Curricular choices of ultra-orthodox Jewish communities: Translating international human rights law into education policy. Oxford Review of Education, 41(5), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1074564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Hazan, L. (2016). Religious affiliation, ethnicity, and power in admission policies to Jewish religious schools. Critical Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1214158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. Oxford University Press.

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.

  • Proctor, C., Tsukayama, E., Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Eades, J. F., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths gym: The impact of a character strengths-based intervention on the life satisfaction and well-being of adolescents. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(5), 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2013). What good are character strengths beyond subjective well-being? The contribution of the good character on self-reported health-oriented behavior, physical fitness, and the subjective health status. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(3), 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, D., Swain, N., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2012). Character strengths interventions: Building on what we know for improved outcomes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(6), 1145–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, D. M., Swain, N., Cameron, C., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2015). How ‘other people matter’ in a classroom-based strengths intervention: Exploring interpersonal strategies and classroom outcomes. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, T., Anjum, A., Lennox, C., Quinlan, D., Niemiec, R. M., Mayerson, D., & Kazemi, F. (2013). Assessment of character strengths in children and adolescents. In C. Proctor & P. A. Linley (Eds.), Research, applications, and interventions for children and adolescents (pp. 81–115). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. (2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Simon and Schuster.

  • Seligman, M. E., Ernst, R. M., Gillham, J., Reivich, K., & Linkins, M. (2009). Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankland, R., & Rosset, E. (2017). Review of brief school-based positive psychological interventions: A taster for teachers and educators. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 363–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoshani, A., & Steinmetz, S. (2014). Positive psychology at school: A school-based intervention to promote adolescents’ mental health and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1289–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoshani, A., Steinmetz, S., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2016). Effects of the Maytiv positive psychology school program on early adolescents' well-being, engagement, and achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 57, 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suldo, S. M., Savage, J. A., & Mercer, S. H. (2014). Increasing middle school students’ life satisfaction: Efficacy of a positive psychology group intervention. Journal of happiness studies, 15(1), 19-42.

  • Taylor, E. (2001). Positive psychology and humanistic psychology: A reply to Seligman. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41(1), 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Woerkom, M., & de Bruijn, M. (2016). Why performance appraisal does not lead to performance improvement: Excellent performance as a function of uniqueness instead of uniformity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 275–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Woerkom, M., Bakker, A. B., & Nishii, L. H. (2016a). Accumulative job demands and support for strength use: Fine-tuning the job demands-resources model using conservation of resources theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Woerkom, M., Mostert, K., Els, C., Bakker, A. B., de Beer, L., & Rothmann, S., Jr. (2016b). Strengths use and deficit correction in organizations: Development and validation of a questionnaire. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(6), 960–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, L., & Ruch, W. (2015). Good character at school: Positive classroom behavior mediates the link between character strengths and school achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, L. (2011). A review of school-based positive psychology interventions. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 28(2), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, L., Barsky, A., Ridd, A., & Allen, K. (2015). Contemplative education: A systematic, evidence-based review of the effect of meditation interventions in schools. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 103–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. A., & Waters, L. E. (2015). A case study of ‘the good school:‘examples of the use of Peterson’s strengths-based approach with students. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Leadership and Policy in Education, University of Haifa, 199 Abba Khoushy Ave., 3498838, Haifa, Israel

    Shiri Lavy

Authors
  1. Shiri Lavy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiri Lavy.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lavy, S. A Review of Character Strengths Interventions in Twenty-First-Century Schools: their Importance and How they can be Fostered. Applied Research Quality Life 15, 573–596 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9700-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9700-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation