Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gambling Control and Public Health: Let’s Be Really Honest

  • Commentary
  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines Shaffer et al.’s (2020) reaction to a Lancet paper that called for an effective public health approach to gambling. The paper claimed policy responses are individually oriented and inadequately address corporate harm determinants. Shaffer et al. maintain these and related claims are incorrect, misleading and driven by personal, political and anti-gambling views. They contend that their Reno model (RM) of responsible gambling is science-based and ascribes responsibility to multiple stakeholders, not just individuals. While agreeing that the RM is not confined to individuals, multiple reviews indicate that the most widely studied and deployed responsible gambling (RG) measures are individually focussed and have low efficacy (RG-light). An individual emphasis is also identified in the content of Shaffer et al.’s paper and it is suggested that some might see this serving industry interests. While agreeing that people who consider a product to be objectionable may view scientific evidence selectively, it is contended that this probably also applies to people who benefit financially from or are enamoured with a product. Although agreeing with a number of statements made by Shaffer et al., it is concluded that others are not well-grounded in fact. This includes statements about problem gambling prevalence and the relative importance of gambling and other determinants of gambling-related harm. While there are points of tension, it is concluded that the RM and associated RG interventions, especially RG-heavy, can play a significant part within a comprehensive regulatory and public health framework that addresses major harm determinants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, M. (2017a). Gambling and gambling harm in New Zealand: a 28-year case study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(6), 1221–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9767-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. (2017b). Commentary on Currie et al. (2017): Low-risk gambling limits—a bridge too far? Addiction, 112(11), 2021–2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. (2017c). Beyond Reno: a critical commentary on Hancock and Smith. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(6), 1177–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9794-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. (2019). Self-directed interventions for gambling disorder. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 32(4), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., & Volberg, R. A. (1999). Gambling and problem gambling in the community: an international overview and critique. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Romild, U., & Volberg, R. A. (2014). Gambling and problem gambling in Sweden: changes between 1998 and 2009. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(4), 985–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9396-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2015). New Zealand National Gambling Study: wave 2 (2013). Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, Gambling & Addictions Research Centre.

  • Abbott, M., Stone, C. A., Billi, R., & Yeung, K. (2016). Gambling and problem gambling in Victoria, Australia: changes over 5 years. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(1), 47–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9542-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Binde, P., Clark, L., Hodgins, D. C., Johnson, M. R., Manitowabi, D., ... & Williams, R. J. (2018a). Conceptual framework of harmful gambling. Ontario: Gambling Research Exchange Ontario Gambling Research Exchange Ontario (GREO).

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., & Garrett, N. (2018b). New Zealand national gambling study: wave 4 (2015). Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, Gambling and Addictions Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Romild, U., & Volberg, R. (2018c). The prevalence, incidence, and gender and age-specific incidence of problem gambling: results of the Swedish longitudinal gambling study (Swelogs). Addiction, 113(4), 699–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Billi, R., Stone, C. A., Marden, P., & Yeung, K. (2014). The Victorian Gambling Study: a longitudinal study of gambling and health in Victoria, 2008–2012. Melbourne: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binde, P. (2011). What are the most harmful forms of gambling? Analyzing problem gambling prevalence surveys (CEFOS Working Papers). Gothenburg: Centrum för forskning om offentlig sector [Center fpr Public Sector Research (CEFOS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Binde, P., Romild, U., & Volberg, R. A. (2017). Forms of gambling, gambling involvement and problem gambling: evidence from a Swedish population survey. International Gambling Studies, 17(3), 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2017.1360928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M., Langham, E., Rawat, V., Greer, N., Li, E., Rose, J., et al. (2016). Assessing gambling-related harm in Victoria: a public health perspective. Melbourne: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M., Bellringer, M., Greer, N., Kolandai-Matchett, K., Langham, E., Rockloff, M., et al. (2017a). Measuring the burden of gambling harm in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M., Greer, N., Rawat, V., & Rockloff, M. (2017b). A population-level metric for gambling-related harm. International Gambling Studies, 17(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2017.1304973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calado, F., & Griffiths, M. D. (2016). Problem gambling worldwide: an update and systematic review of empirical research (2000–2015). Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5(4), 592–613. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.073.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Casey, D. M., el-Guebaly, N., Smith, G. J., Williams, R. J., & Schopflocher, D. P. (2017). Deriving low-risk gambling limits from longitudinal data collected in two independent Canadian studies. Addiction, 112(11), 2011–2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00962.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N., Youssef, G., Greenwood, C., Merkouris, S., Suomi, A., & Room, R. (2018). The development of empirically derived Australian responsible gambling limits. Melbourne: Victorian Responsible Gambling Fondation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drawson, A. S., Tanner, J., Mushquash, C. J., Mushquash, A. R., & Mazmanian, D. (2017). The use of protective behavioural strategies in gambling: a systematic review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(6), 1302–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9754-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eadington, W. R. (2003). Measuring costs from permitted gaming: concepts and categories in evaluating gambling's consequences. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(2), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023681315907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • el-Guebaly, N., Casey, D. M., Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Schopflocher, D. P., Smith, G. J., & Williams, R. J. (2015). The leisure, lifestyle, & lifecycle project (LLLP): a longitudinal study of gambling in Alberta. In Final Report for the Alberta Gambling Research Institute. Edmonton: Alberta Gambling Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, D., & Gold, M. (1998). Casino industry fights an emerging backlash: gambling: leaders mount sophisticated effort to protect interest, as critics say growth is creating more addicts. Los Angeles Times, December, 4, 1998.

  • Goudriaan, A. E. (2014). Gambling and problem gambling in the Netherlands. Addiction, 109(7), 1066–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (2019). Gambling, problem gambling, and responsible gambling in New Zealand and elsewhere: a brief overview in relation to increasing the number of electronic gaming machines in a casino (pp. 1–43). Report prepared for SkyCity [October 2019].

  • Hancock, L., & Smith, G. (2017). Replacing the Reno model with a robust public health approach to “responsible gambling”: Hancock and Smith’s response to commentaries on our original Reno model critique. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(6), 1209–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9836-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson, L. E., & Lipsey, R. G. (1999). Should provinces expand gambling? Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 25(2), 259–275 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3551892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, B. P. (1997). The courage to be counted. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13(4), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024963220070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latvala, T., Lintonen, T., & Konu, A. (2019). Public health effects of gambling–debate on a conceptual model. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7391-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, C., Rintoul, A., de Lacy-Vawdon, C., Borland, R., Dietze, P., Jenkinson, R., ... & Stoove, M. (2019). Identifying effective policy interventions to prevent gambling-related harm. Melbourne: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.

  • Markham, F., Young, M., & Doran, B. (2014). Gambling expenditure predicts harm: evidence from a venue-level study. Addiction, 109(9), 1509–1516. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, R. (1997). The ethics of gambling research: an agenda for mature analysis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13(4), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024907102323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, N., Thomson, K., Kaner, E., & Bambra, C. (2019). Effects of prevention and harm reduction interventions on gambling behaviours and gambling related harm: an umbrella review. Addictive Behaviors, 90, 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C., Bischof, A., Westram, A., Jeske, C., de Brito, S., Glorius, S., et al. (2015). The “Pathological Gambling and Epidemiology”(PAGE) study program: design and fieldwork. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 24(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1458.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Seabury, C., & Wardle, H. (2014). Gambling behaviour in England and Scotland. Birmingham: Gambling Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J. (1997). Gambling research & science: toward a mature relationship. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13(4), 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024934218252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: a research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1369–1376. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., Blaszczynski, A., & Ladouceur, R. (2017). Truth, alternative facts, narrative, and science: what is happening to responsible gambling and gambling disorder? International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(6), 1197–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9779-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., Collins, P., & Fong, D. (Eds.). (2019). Responsible gambling: primary stakeholder perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., Blaszczynski, A., & Ladouceur, R. (2020). Gambling control and public health: Let’s be honest. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00240-0.

  • Sulkunen, P., Babor, T. F., Ornberg, J. C., Egerer, M., Hellman, M., Livingstone, C., et al. (2018). Setting limits: gambling, science and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, J., Drawson, A. S., Mushquash, C. J., Mushquash, A. R., & Mazmanian, D. (2017). Harm reduction in gambling: a systematic review of industry strategies. Addiction Research & Theory, 25(6), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2017.1310204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Lancet. (2017). Problem gambling is a public health concern. Lancet (London, England), 390(10098), 913.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Schalkwyk, M. C., Cassidy, R., McKee, M., & Petticrew, M. (2019). Gambling control: in support of a public health response to gambling. Lancet (London, England), 393(10182), 1680–1681. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30704-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, H., Reith, G., Best, D., McDaid, D., & Platt, S. (2018). Measuring gambling-related harms: a framework for action. Birmingham: Gambling Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, H., Reith, G., Langham, E., & Rogers, R. D. (2019). Gambling and public health: we need policy action to prevent harm. BMJ, 365, l1807. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1807.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2012a). Prevention of problem gambling: a comprehensive review of the evidence and identified best practices. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. (2012b). The population prevalence of problem gambling: methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2007). Prevention of problem gambling: a comprehensive review of the evidence. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre. Guelph, Ontario. http://hdl.handle.net/10133/414

  • Williams, R. J., Hann, R. G., Schopflocher, D. P., West, B. L., McLaughlin, P., White, N., et al. (2015). Quinte longitudinal study of gambling and problem gambling. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xouridas, S., Jasny, J., & Becker, T. (2016). An ecological approach to electronic gambling machines and socioeconomic deprivation in Germany. Journal of Gambling Issues, 33, 82–102. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2016.33.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges Dr. Giulia Lowe for assistance in formatting, proofing and submitting the commentary.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gambling and Addictions Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, 0627, New Zealand

    Max Abbott

Authors
  1. Max Abbott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Abbott.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbott, M. Gambling Control and Public Health: Let’s Be Really Honest. Int J Ment Health Addiction 18, 825–834 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00266-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00266-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation