Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting Attrition in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders

  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors examined the retention rates of 191 participants who were assigned to an episode of substance abuse treatment. Two types of attrition, due to participants withdrawing prematurely from treatment or failing to complete a posttest survey, were investigated. A significant finding of the study was that attrition can be predicted with some certainty. In spite of being a consistent predictor of attrition, however, quantitative measures explained only about 27 % of the variance in therapy outcomes. Therefore, recommendations for future research were included to highlight the importance of exploring the impact of contextual factors on client retention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R. S. (2014). Strengths and challenges of client outcomes in substance abuse treatment: The what and why of effective therapy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Louis University, Chicago IL.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Text Revision.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrowclough, C., Meier, P., Beardmore, R., & Emsley, R. (2010). Predicting therapeutic alliance in clients with psychosis and substance misuse. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198(5), 373–377. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181da4d4e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A., Hood, D., Brozovsky, P., Ochs, L., Ary, D., & Black, C. (1991). Subject attrition in prevention research. In W. Bukoski & K. Leukefeld (Eds.), Drug abuse prevention research: methodological issues. NIDA research monograph 107 (pp. 213–223). National Institute on Drug Abuse: Rockville MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, K. T., & Randall, C. L. (1999). Gender differences in substance use disorders. Addictive Disorders, 22(2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, B. L., Arkowitz, H., & Menchola, M. (2003). The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 843–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, K. M., Ball, S. A., Nich, C., Martino, S., Frankforter, T. L., Farentinos, C., & Woody, G. E. (2006). Motivational interviewing to improve treatment engagement and outcome in individuals seeking treatment for substance abuse: a multisite effectiveness study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 81(3), 301–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (1994). Simple screening instruments for outreach and other drug abuse: Treatment improvement protocol (TIP) series II (DHHS Publication No. 94–2094). Retrieved from http://www.ncdhhs.gov/mhddsas/DWI/dual diagnosis/SSI-AOD.pdf

  • Cournoyer, L. G., Brochu, S., Landry, M., & Bergeron, J. (2007). Therapeutic alliance, patient behavior and dropout in a drug rehabilitation program: the moderating effect of clinical subpopulations. Addiction, 102(12), 1960–1970. doi:10.1111/ j.1360-0443.2007.02027.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Leon, G. (2000). The therapeutic community. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havassy, B. E., Hall, S. M., & Wasserman, D. A. (1991). Social support and relapse: commonalities among alcoholics, opiate users, and cigarette smokers. Addictive Behaviors, 16(5), 235–246. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(91)90016-B.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joe, G. W., Simpson, D. D., & Broome, K. M. (1999). Retention and patient engagement models for different treatment modalities in DATOS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57(2), 113–125. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00088-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kills-Small, N. J., Simons, J. S., & Stricherz, M. (2007). Assessing criterion validity of the simple screening instrument for alcohol and other drug abuse in a college population. Addictive Behaviors, 32(10), 2425–2431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundahl, B. W., & Burke, B. L. (2009). The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(11), 1232–1245. doi:10.1002/jclp.20638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundahl, B. W., Kunz, C., Brownell, C., Tollefson, D., & Burke, B. L. (2010). A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing: twenty-five years of empirical studies. Research on Social Work Practice, 20(2), 137–160. doi:10.1177/10497315093 47850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlatt, G. A., & Witkiewitz, K. (2005). Relapse prevention for alcohol and drug problems. In G. A. Marlatt & D. M. Donovan (Eds.), Relapse prevention: maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors (pp. 1–31). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. J., Garske, J. P., & Davis, M. K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 438–450. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, P. S., Barrowclough, C., & Donmall, M. C. (2005a). The role of the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of substance misuse: a critical review of the literature. Addiction, 100(3), 304–316. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00935.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, P. S., Donmall, M. C., Barrowclough, C., McElduff, P., & Heller, R. F. (2005b). Predicting the early therapeutic alliance in the treatment of drug misuse. Addiction, 100(4), 500–511. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01031.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., Zweben, A., DiClemente, C. C., & Rychtarik, R. G. (1995). Motivational enhancement therapy manual. In M. E. Mattson (Ed.), Project MATCH monograph series (Vol. 2, pp. 1–121). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

  • Moos, R. H. (2007). Theory-based active ingredients of effective treatments for substance use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 88(2), 109–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C., & Johnston, M. (2008). Adult needs and strengths assessment: abbreviated referral version to specify psychiatric care needed for incoming patients, exploratory analysis. Psychological Reports, 102(1), 131–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, B. (2012). The myth of hitting rock bottom: the power of intervention. Indiana Prevention Resource Center, Indiana University Bloomington. Retrieved from http://www.drugs.indiana.edu/

  • The Praed Foundation. (2011). About the ANSA. Retrieved from http://www.praedfoundation.org/About%20the%20ANSA.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Sky Allen.

Additional information

Authors’ Notes: Dr. Allen is a licensed psychotherapist in the Outpatient Substance Abuse program of Regional Mental Health Center, 3903 Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana 46312, USA. Dr. Olson is an associate professor in the Community Psychology program of National Louis University, 122 South Michigan Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60603, USA. The authors would like to thank Dr. Judah J. Viola, Dr. Suzette Fromm Reed, and Dr. Tiffeny R. Jimenez for their assistance with this study. Please direct correspondence to Robert Sky Allen at skyallen@comcast.net, 219-392-6998 (fax). The authors wish to confirm that there is no known conflict of interest associated with this manuscript, and there has been no financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. The authors confirm that the manuscript was written and approved by the named authors, and that there are no other persons who satisfy the criteria for authorship but are not listed. The authors confirm that they have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this manuscript, and that they followed the policies and regulations of their institutions concerning intellectual property. They further confirm that any aspect of this manuscript that involved human participants has been conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies. This manuscript has not been published elsewhere, nor has it been submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere.

Appendices

Appendix A

Simple Screening Instrument for AOD Abuse

Self-Administered Form

Directions: The questions that follow are about your use of alcohol and other drugs. Your answers will be kept private. Mark the response that best fits for you. Answer the questions in terms of your experiences in the past six months.

During the last six months. . .

figure afigure a

Appendix B

Scale Data Indices

SEX:

Male

1

Female

2

RACE/ETHNICITY:

Black/African American

1

White/European American

2

Hispanic/Latino/Latina

3

Native American

4

Asian/Asian American

5

Pacific Islander

6

Other

7

AGE:

18–24

1

25–34

2

35–44

3

45–54

4

55–64

5

65+

6

MARITAL STATUS:

Not married/never married

1

Married/living together

2

Divorced/separated/widowed

3

EDUCATION:

 

Elementary (0–8 years)

1

Some high school (1–3 years)

2

High school graduate (4 years)

3

Some college (1–3 years)

4

College graduate (4 years or more)

5

OCCUPATION:

Production worker

1

Professional specialty

2

Sales

3

Service industry

4

Technical

5

Transportation or material moving

6

Law enforcement

7

Military

8

Entertainment

9

Other

10

None

11

SURVEY QUESTIONS:

Yes

1

No

2

ANSA LEVEL OF NEED:

 

Mild

1

Moderate

2

Moderately severe

3

Severe

4

Profound

5

ATTRITION:

Completed treatment

1

Did not complete treatment

2

Unable to contact

3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allen, R.S., Olson, B.D. Predicting Attrition in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders. Int J Ment Health Addiction 14, 728–742 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9602-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9602-x

Keywords

Navigation