Abstract
The ‘poker-machine state’ is a description of a state of affairs that exists in Victoria, Australia. We can describe this state in part by calculating one or another index to estimate the harmful impact of poker machines (high-intensity electronic gaming machines or EGMs). The nature of the poker-machine business means that this impact must occur. Full description, however, requires us to describe four additional aspects of the poker-machine state. First, heavy users of poker machines necessarily lose control. Second, the poker-machine state necessarily causes and constitutes harm. Third, our governments perpetrate the harm. Fourth, the agents of harm, business corporations, profit from the harm. The various aspects of this description provide evidence for the conclusion that the poker-machine state is unethical.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (2003). George’s gold. 4 Corners. 13 October 2003. Retrieved April 11, 2005, from http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2003/transcripts/s965996.htm.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2003). Socio-economic indexes for areas, Australia 2001. (Cat. No. 2039.0). Canberra: ABS.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2005a). Taxation Revenue, Australia. (Cat. No. 5506.0). Retrieved April 17, 2005, from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/945449BF849F6071CA256889001E54AD.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2005b). Household income and income distribution, Australia. (Cat. No. 6523.0). Canberra: ABS.
Australian Medical Association (1999). Position statement: Health effects of problem gambling. Retrieved April 17, 2005, from http://www.ama.com.au/web.nsf/doc/SHED-5G7CJM.
Breiter, H. C., Aharon, I., Kahneman, D., Dale, A., & Shizgal, P. (2001). Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron, 30, 619–639.
Dickerson, M. G. (2003a). Reframing ‘responsible gambling’ as consumer protection. Submission to the IPART review of gambling harm minimization measures (ref:03/308). Retrieved November 25, 2005, from http://www.ncalg.org/Library/Studies%20and%20White%20Papers/Addiction%20and%20Health/dickersonipartsubmission.pdf.
Dickerson, M. G. (2003b). Exploring the limits of “responsible gambling”: Harm minimization or consumer protection? Gambling Research (Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies Australia), 15, 29–44.
Dickerson, M. G. (2004). Measuring and modeling of impaired control: Implications for policy. Insight International Problem Gambling Conference. Nova Scotia, Canada, 5 October. Retrieved November 25, 2005, from http://www.nsgamingfoundation.org/main/presentations/Professor%20Mark%20Dickerson.pdf.
Doughney, J. (2002). The poker machine state: Dilemmas in ethics, economics & governance. Melbourne: Common Ground Publishing http://www.theHumanities.com.
Doughney, J. (2004). Living off immoral earnings: An ethical critique of the Victorian poker machine partnership. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 6(1), 20–35.
Doughney, J. (2005). Moral description: Overcoming the fact-value dichotomy in social research. eCOMMUNITY: International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2(2), 6–12.
Gaita, R. (1999). A Common Humanity. Melbourne: Text.
KPMG Consulting (2000). Longitudinal community impact study. Melbourne: Victorian Casino and Gaming Authority.
Livingstone, C. (2001). The social economy of poker machine gambling in Victoria. International Gambling Studies, 1, 46–65 (September).
McMillen, J., & Marshall, D. (2004). 2003 Victorian Longitudinal Attitudes Survey. GRP report no. 6. Melbourne: Gambling Research Panel.
Middleton, J., & Manetta, J. (2002). Joint memorandum of advice. Unpublished legal opinion. Melbourne: Urban Seed Mission.
O’Neil, M., Whetton, S., Dolman, B., Dolman, M., & Giannopoulus, V. (2005). Study of the Impact of Caps on Electronic Gaming Machines. Melbourne: Office of Gaming and Racing, Department of Justice of Victoria. Retrieved April 3, 2006, from http://www.justice.vic.gov.au/CA256902000FE154/Lookup/GRP_Reports_Files1/file/Caps_Complete_forweb_05.pdf.
Productivity Commission (1999). Australia’s Gambling Industries. Parts I & II. Canberra: Productivity Commission. Retrieved April 3, from http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiry/gambling/finalreport/index.html.
Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (2004). 2003 Nova Scotia Gambling Prevalence Study Nova Scotia Office of Health Promotion, Final Report June 2004. Halifax: Nova Scotia Office of Health Promotion.
Tattersall’s (2002). Customer Relationship Management Program: What Have We Learnt? Melbourne: Tattersall’s.
Victorian Commission for Gaming Regulation (2005). Industry information. Retrieved November 7, 2005, from http://www.vcgr.vic.gov.au/domino/web_notes/vcgr/site.nsf/pages/industryinfo.
Walters, B. (2003). George’s gold. 4 Corners. 13 October 2003. Retrieved April 18, 2005, from http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2003/20031013_georges_gold/int_walters.htm.
Acknowledgment
My thanks to the editor and an anonymous reviewer for critical comments that, I hope, have strengthened this article. Of course, they bear no responsibility for its content.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doughney, J. The Poker-machine State in Australia: A Consideration of Ethical and Policy Issues. Int J Ment Health Addiction 4, 351–368 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-006-9031-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-006-9031-y