Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient utilization of wind power: Long-distance transmission or local consumption?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Excess wind power produced in wind-intensive areas is normally delivered to remote load centers via long-distance transmission lines. This paper presents a comparison between long-distance transmission, which has gained popularity, and local energy consumption, in which a fraction of the generated wind power can be locally consumed by energy-intensive industries. First, the challenges and solutions to the long-distance transmission and local consumption of wind power are presented. Then, the two approaches to the utilization of wind power are compared in terms of system security, reliability, cost, and capability to utilize wind energy. Finally, the economic feasibility and technical feasibility of the local consumption of wind power are demonstrated by a large and isolated industrial power system, or supermicrogrid, in China. The coal-fired generators together with the short-term interruptible electrolytic aluminum load in the supermicrogrid are able to compensate for the intermittency of wind power. In the long term, the transfer of high-energy-consumption industries to wind-rich areas and their local consumption of the available wind power are beneficial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hart E H, Stoutenburg E D, Jacobson M Z. The potential of intermittent renewables to meet electric power demand: Current methods and emerging analytical techniques. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100(2): 322–334

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erlich I, Shewarega F, Feltes C, et al. Offshore wind power generation technologies. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2013, 101(4): 891–905

    Google Scholar 

  3. GWEC. Global Wind Report 2015—Annual market update. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/vip/ GWEC-Global-Wind-2015-Report_April-2016_22_04.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hatziargyriou N, Zervos A. Wind power development in Europe. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2001, 89(12): 1765–1782

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paulus M, Borggrefe F. The potential of demand-side management in energy-intensive industries for electricity markets in Germany. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(2): 432–441

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ackermann T, Abbad J R, Dudurych I M, et al. European balancing act. IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, 2007, 5(6): 90–103

    Google Scholar 

  7. Farahmand H, Aigner T, Doorman G L, et al. Balancing market integration in the Northern European continent: A 2030 case study. In: Proceedings of IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. IEEE, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hammons T J, Lescale V F, Uecker K, et al. State of the art in ultrahigh-voltage transmission. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100(2): 360–390

    Google Scholar 

  9. BP. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2016. Retrieved from bp.com/statisticalreview

    Google Scholar 

  10. Piwko R, Osborn D, Gramlich R, et al. Wind energy delivery issues [transmission planning and competitive electricity market operation]. IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, 2005, 3(6): 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  11. Swisher R, De Azua C R, Clendenin J. Strong winds on the horizon: Wind power comes of age. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2001, 89(12): 1757–1764

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aparicio N, MacGill I, Rivier Abbad J, et al. Comparison of wind energy support policy and electricity market design in Europe, the United States, and Australia. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2012, 3(4): 809–818

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Electricity Data. Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.cfm#generation

  14. National Energy Administration of China. The Utilization Hours of Many Generating Sets is Decreasing in 2015. 2016 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Purvins A, Zubaryeva A, Llorente M, et al. Challenges and options for a large wind power uptake by the European electricity system. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(5): 1461–1469

    Google Scholar 

  16. Giebel G. A variance analysis of the capacity displaced by wind energy in Europe. Wind Energy (Chichester, England), 2007, 10 (1): 69–79

    Google Scholar 

  17. Østergaard P A. Geographic aggregation and wind power output variance in Denmark. Energy, 2008, 33(9): 1453–1460

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aigner T, Jaehnert S, Doorman G L, et al. The effect of large-scale wind power on system balancing in Northern Europe. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2012, 3(4): 751–759

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ma X, Sun Y, Fang H, et al. Scenario-based multiobjective decision-making of optimal access point for wind power transmission corridor in the load centers. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2013, 4(1): 229–239

    Google Scholar 

  20. State Electricity Regulatory Commission of China. Supervision Report of Wind Power Utilization in Key Areas. 2012 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rebours Y, Kirschen D. A Survey of Definitions and Specifications of Reserve Services. University of Manchester Report. 2005

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmadi-Khatir A, Conejo A J, Cherkaoui R. Multi-area energy and reserve dispatch under wind uncertainty and equipment failures. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(4): 4373–4383

    Google Scholar 

  23. Huang D, Shu Y, Ruan J, et al. Ultra high voltage transmission in China: Developments, current status and future prospects. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2009, 97(3): 555–583

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Development and Reform Commission. 12th Five-Year- Plan of Renewable Energy Development. 2012 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Heydt G T, Ayyanar R, Hedman K W, et al. Electric power and energy engineering: The first century. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100(Special Centennial Issue): 1315–1328

    Google Scholar 

  26. Haileselassie T M, Uhlen K. Power system security in a meshed North Sea HVDC grid. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2013, 101(4): 978–990

    Google Scholar 

  27. Egea-Alvarez A, Bianchi F, Junyent-Ferre A, et al. Voltage control of multiterminal VSC-HVDC transmission systems for offshore wind power plants: Design and implementation in a scaled platform. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2013, 60 (6): 2381–2391

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liang J, Jing T, Gomis-Bellmunt O, et al. Operation and control of multiterminal HVDC transmission for offshore wind farms. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2011, 26(4): 2596–2604

    Google Scholar 

  29. Abdel-Khalik A S, Massoud A M, Elserougi A A, et al. Optimum power transmission-based droop control design for multi-terminal HVDC of offshore wind farms. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(3): 3401–3409

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kabouris J, Kanellos F D. Impacts of large-scale wind penetration on designing and operation of electric power systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2010, 1(2): 107–114

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xie L, Carvalho PMS, Ferreira L A FM, et al. Wind integration in power systems: Operational challenges and possible solutions. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2011, 99(1): 214–232

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ma X, Sun Y, Fang H. Scenario generation of wind power based on statistical uncertainty and variability. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2013, 4(4): 894–904

    Google Scholar 

  33. Piwko R, Meibom P, Holttinen H, et al. Penetrating insights: Lessons learned from large-scale wind power integration. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 2012, 10(2): 44–52

    Google Scholar 

  34. Navid N, Rosenwald G. Market solutions for managing ramp flexibility with high penetration of renewable resource. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2012, 3(4): 784–790

    Google Scholar 

  35. RWE. The Need for Smart Megawatts Power Generation in Europe—Facts & Trends. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lannoye E, Flynn D, O’Malley M. Evaluation of power system flexibility. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2012, 27(2): 922–931

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hossain M J, Pota H R, Mahmud M A, et al. Investigation of the impacts of large-scale wind power penetration on the angle and voltage stability of power systems. IEEE Systems Journal, 2012, 6 (1): 76–84

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chompoo-inwai C, Lee W J, Fuangfoo P, et al. System impact study for the interconnection of wind generation and utility system. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2005, 41(1): 163–168

    Google Scholar 

  39. Slootweg J G, Kling W L. The impact of large scale wind power generation on power system oscillations. Electric Power Systems Research, 2003, 67(1): 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  40. Domínguez-García J L, Gomis-Bellmunt O, Bianchi F D, et al. Power oscillation damping supported by wind power: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(7): 4994–5006

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tsourakis G, Nomikos B M, Vournas C D. Contribution of doubly fed wind generators to oscillation damping. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2009, 24(3): 783–791

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gu Y, McCalley J D, Ni M. Coordinating large-scale wind integration and transmission planning. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2012, 3(4): 652–659

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yu H, Chung C Y, Wong K P, et al. A chance constrained transmission network expansion planning method with consideration of load and wind farm uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2009, 24(3): 1568–1576

    Google Scholar 

  44. Muñoz C, Sauma E, Contreras J, et al. Impact of high wind power penetration on transmission network expansion planning. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2012, 6(12): 1281–1291

    Google Scholar 

  45. Manjure D P, Mishra Y, Brahma S, et al. Impact of wind power development on transmission planning at midwest ISO. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2012, 3(4): 845–852

    Google Scholar 

  46. Salazar H, Liu C C, Chu R F. Decision analysis of merchant transmission investment by perpetual options theory. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2007, 22(3): 1194–1201

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ni M, Yang Z. By leaps and bounds: Lessons learned from renewable energy growth in China. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 2012, 10(2): 37–43

    Google Scholar 

  48. Giebel G, Brownsword R, Kariniotakis G, et al. The State-of-the-Art in Short-Term Prediction of Wind Power: A Literature Overview, 2nd Edition. Risø National Laboratory, Technical Report. 2011

    Google Scholar 

  49. Monteiro R B C, Miranda V, Botterud A, et al. Wind Power Forecasting: State of the Art 2009. Argonne National Laboratory, Technical Report. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tastu J, Pinson P, Trombe P J, et al. Probabilistic forecasts of wind power generation accounting for geographically dispersed information. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2014, 5(1): 480–489

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yang M, Fan S, Lee W J. Probabilistic short-term wind power forecast using componential sparse Bayesian learning. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2013, 49(6): 2783–2792

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pinson P. Estimation of the uncertainty in wind power forecasting. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Paris: Ecole des Mines de Paris, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang J, Shahidehpour M, Li Z. Security-constrained unit commitment with volatile wind power generation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(3): 1319–1327

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tuohy A, Meibom P, Denny E, et al. Unit commitment for systems with significant wind penetration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2009, 24(2): 592–601

    Google Scholar 

  55. Pinson P, Madsen H, Nielsen H A, et al. From probabilistic forecasts to statistical scenarios of short-term wind power production. Wind Energy (Chichester, England), 2009, 12(1): 51–62

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jiang R, Wang J, Guan Y. Robust unit commitment with wind power and pumped storage hydro. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2012, 27(2): 800–810

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhao C, Guan Y. Unified stochastic and robust unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(3): 3353–3361

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang N, Kang C, Kirschen D S, et al. Planning pumped storage capacity for wind power integration. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2013, 4(2): 393–401

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sahin C, Shahidehpour M, Erkmen I. Allocation of hourly reserve versus demand response for security-constrained scheduling of stochastic wind energy. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2013, 4(1): 219–228

    Google Scholar 

  60. Botterud A, Zhou Z, Wang J, et al. Demand dispatch and probabilistic wind power forecasting in unit commitment and economic dispatch: A case study of Illinois. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2013, 4(1): 250–261

    Google Scholar 

  61. De Jonghe C, Hobbs B F, Belmans R. Optimal generation mix with short-term demand response and wind penetration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2012, 27(2): 830–839

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lin W, Wen J, Liang J, et al. A three-terminal HVDC system to bundle wind farms with conventional power plants. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(3): 2292–2300

    Google Scholar 

  63. Taggart S, James G, Dong Z, et al. The future of renewables linked by a transnational Asian grid. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100 (2): 348–359

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ding Z, Guo Y, Wu D, et al. A market based scheme to integrate distributed wind energy. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2013, 4 (2): 976–984

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hammons T J. Integrating renewable energy sources into European grids. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2008, 30(8): 462–475

    Google Scholar 

  66. Obara S, Morizane Y, Morel J. A study of small-scale energy networks of the Japanese Syowa base in Antarctica by distributed engine generators. Applied Energy, 2013, 111: 113–128

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lasseter R H. Smart distribution: Coupled microgrids. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2011, 99(6): 1074–1082

    Google Scholar 

  68. Nikkhajoei H, Lasseter R H. Distributed generation interface to the CERTS microgrid. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2009, 24(3): 1598–1608

    Google Scholar 

  69. Li J, Ma X, Liu C C, et al. Distribution system restoration with microgrids using spanning tree search. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2014, 29(6): 3021–3029

    Google Scholar 

  70. Bao I S, Kim J O. Reliability evaluation of customers in a microgrid. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(3): 1416–1422

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zhao B, Zhang X, Chen J, et al. Operation optimization of standalone microgrids considering lifetime characteristics of battery energy storage system. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2013, 4(4): 934–943

    Google Scholar 

  72. Chang C A, Wu Y K, Chen W T, et al. A novel power system defense plan to cope with 30% wind power penetration in the isolated Penghu system. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2013, 49(4): 1669–1677

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hatziargyriou N, Asano H, Iravani R, et al. Microgrids. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 2007, 5(4): 78–94

    Google Scholar 

  74. Marrero G A, Ramos-Real F J. Electricity generation cost in isolated system: The complementarities of natural gas and renewables in the Canary Islands. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(9): 2808–2818

    Google Scholar 

  75. Rehman S, Mahbub Alam M, Meyer J P, et al. Feasibility study of a wind-PV-diesel hybrid power system for a village. Renewable Energy, 2012, 38(1): 258–268

    Google Scholar 

  76. Kaldellis J, Kapsali M, Kavadias K. Energy balance analysis of wind-based pumped hydro storage systems in remote island electrical networks. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(8): 2427–2437

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sun Y, Lin J, Song Y, et al. An industrial system powered by wind and coal for aluminum production: A case study of technical demonstration and economic feasibility. Energies, 2012, 5(12): 4844–4869

    Google Scholar 

  78. Lin J, Sun Y, Song Y, et al. Wind power fluctuation smoothing controller based on risk assessment of grid frequency deviation in an isolated system. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2013, 4(2): 379–392

    Google Scholar 

  79. Xu J, Liao S, Sun Y, et al. An isolated industrial power system driven by wind-coal power for aluminum productions: A case study of frequency control using voltage adjusting. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2015, 30(1): 471–483

    Google Scholar 

  80. Jiang H, Lin J, Song Y, et al. Demand side frequency control scheme in an isolated wind power system for industrial aluminum smelting production. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2014, 29(2): 844–853

    Google Scholar 

  81. Liao S Y, Xu J, Sun Y, et al. Load-damping characteristic control method in an isolated power system with industrial voltagesensitive load. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2015, 2015 (31): 1118–1128

    Google Scholar 

  82. Cui T, Lin W, Sun Y, et al. Excitation voltage control for emergency frequency regulation of island power system with voltage-dependent loads. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2016, 31(2): 1204–1217

    Google Scholar 

  83. Jiang H, Lin J, Song Y, et al. MPC-based frequency control with demand-side participation: A case study in an isolated windaluminum power system. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2015, 30(6): 3327–3337

    Google Scholar 

  84. Sun Y, Liao S, Xu J, et al. Industrial implementation of a wide area measurement system based control scheme in an isolated power system driven by wind-coal power for aluminum productions. IET Generation, Transactions and Distribution, 2016, 10(8): 1877–1882

    Google Scholar 

  85. Bao Y, Xu J, Sun Y, et al. An industrial verification of frequency regulation by electrolytic aluminum in an isolated power system. In: Proceedings of Power and Energy Society General Meeting. IEEE, 2016, 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  86. Bridges J E. Wind power energy storage for in situ shale oil recovery with minimal CO2 emissions. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2007, 22(1): 103–109

    Google Scholar 

  87. Mozina C J. Wind-power generation: Impact of wind generators on distribution systems. IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, 2011, 17(3): 37–43

    Google Scholar 

  88. Lopes J P, Moreira C, Madureira A. Defining control strategies for microgrids islanded operation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2006, 21(2): 916–924

    Google Scholar 

  89. Siddiqui A S, Marnay C. Distributed generation investment by a microgrid under uncertainty. Energy, 2008, 33(12): 1729–1737

    Google Scholar 

  90. Chen S X, Gooi H B, Wang M Q. Sizing of energy storage for microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2012, 3(1): 142–151

    Google Scholar 

  91. Zhou W, Lou C, Li Z, et al. Current status of research on optimum sizing of stand-alone hybrid solar—Wind power generation systems. Applied Energy, 2010, 87(2): 380–389

    Google Scholar 

  92. Luo C, Ooi B T. Frequency deviation of thermal power plants due to wind farms. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2006, 21 (3): 708–716

    Google Scholar 

  93. Lew D, Brinkman G, Kumar N, et al. Impacts of wind and solar on emissions and wear and tear of fossil-fueled generators. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2012, 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  94. Cardenas R, Pena R, Alepuz S, et al. Overview of control systems for the operation of DFIGs in wind energy applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2013, 60(7): 2776–2798

    Google Scholar 

  95. Ma H, Chowdhury B. Working towards frequency regulation with wind plants: Combined control approaches. IET Generation, Transactions and Distribution, 2010, 4(4): 308–316

    Google Scholar 

  96. Chang-Chien L R, Lin W T, Yin Y C. Enhancing frequency response control by DFIGs in the high wind penetrated power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2011, 26(2): 710–718

    Google Scholar 

  97. Zhang Z, Sun Y, Lin J, et al. Coordinated frequency regulation by doubly fed induction generator-based wind power plants. IET Generation, Transactions and Distribution, 2012, 6(1): 38–47

    Google Scholar 

  98. Babu C A, Ashok S. Peak Load Management in Electrolytic Process Industries. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23 (2): 399–405

    Google Scholar 

  99. State Power Investment Corporation. Feasibility Study on the Demonstration Project of Circular Economy in East Inner Mongolia. 2010 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  100. National Development and Reform Commission. Notice on price policy improvement for onshore wind power. 2009. Retrieved from http://zfxxgk.ndrc.gov.cn/PublicItemView.aspx?ItemID =f52635-547c-490f-8334-7fdbdb5d057a (in Chinese)

  101. Ministry of Industry and Information of China. 12th Five-Year-Plan of Nonferrous Metals. 2011 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Information Website on China’s Industry. The 2015 statistics on provincial yield of electrolytic aluminum in China. 2015. Retrieved from http://www.chyxx.com/data/201511/356162.html (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Electrolytic Aluminum Industry. Why the production capacity is excess, while there are newly built projects? 2013. Retrieved from http://finance.people.com.cn/n/2013/0520/c1004-21536244.html (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0900105) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51190105 and 51477122).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Ma, X., Xu, J. et al. Efficient utilization of wind power: Long-distance transmission or local consumption?. Front. Mech. Eng. 12, 440–455 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-017-0440-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-017-0440-3

Keywords

Navigation