Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between four piezoelectric energy harvesting circuits

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates and compares the efficiencies of four different interfaces for vibration-based energy harvesting systems. Among those four circuits, two circuits adopt the synchronous switching technique, in which the circuit is switched synchronously with the vibration. In this study, a simple source-less trigger circuit used to control the synchronized switch is proposed and two interface circuits of energy harvesting systems are designed based on the trigger circuit. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed circuits, an experimental system was established and the power harvested by those circuits from a vibration beam was measured. Experimental results show that the two new circuits can increase the harvested power by factors 2.6 and 7, respectively, without consuming extra power in the circuits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chandrakasan A, Amirtharajah R, Cho S H. Design considerations for distributed microsensor systems. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Annual Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, May16–19, San Diego, 1999: 279–286

  2. Davis C, Lssieuter G. An actively tuned solid-state vibration absorber using capacitive shunting of piezoelectric stiffness. Journal of Sound Vibration, 2000, 232: 601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rabaey J M, Ammer M J, Julio L. da Silva. PicoRadio supports ad hoc ultra-low power wireless networking. Computer, 2000, 33: 42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ottman G K, Bhattt A C, Hofmann H. Adaptive piezoelectric energy harvesting circuit for wireless, remote power supply. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2002, 17(5): 669–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hofmann H, Ottman G K, Lesieutre G A. Optimized piezoelectric energy circuit using step-down converter in discontinuous conduction mode. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2002, 18(2): 696–703

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lesieutre G A, Hofmann H, Ottman G K. Damping as a result of piezoelectric energy harvesting. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004, 269: 991–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guyomar D, Badel A, Lefeuvre E. Toward energy harvesting using active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2005, 52(4): 584–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Badel A, Benayad A, Lefeuvre E. Single Crystals and nonlinear process for outstanding vibration-powered electrical generators. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2006, 53(4): 673–684

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lefeuvre E, Adrien B, Claude R. A comparison between several vibration-powered piezoelectric generators for standalone systems. Sensors and Actuators A, 2006, 126: 405–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yabu T, Onoda J. Non-power-supply semi-active vibration suppression with piezoelectric actuator. In: Proceedings of the 47th Symposium on Structural Strength, Japan Society of Astronautics, Kanazawa, Japan, July 20–22, 2005: 48–50

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinhao Qiu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qiu, J., Jiang, H., Ji, H. et al. Comparison between four piezoelectric energy harvesting circuits. Front. Mech. Eng. China 4, 153–159 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-009-0031-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-009-0031-z

Keywords

Navigation