Abstract
The functions of canopy interception on energy conversion processes in a Chinese fir plantation ecosystem were studied with the aid of long-term observation data in Huitong. The results showed that the absorbed, penetrated and reflected amounts of solar radiation were, respectively, 2.5543 × 109 J/(m2·year) (absorption rate of 0.827), 2.5306 × 108 J/(m2·year) (penetration rate of 0.082), and 2.7432 × 108 J/(m2·year) (reflection rate of 0.091) by the canopy. The conversion of net solar radiation to latent heat in the process of evaporation from canopy interception amounted to 6.3695 × 108 J/(m2·year) (accounting for 22.9% of total ecosystem net radiation and 30.4% of ecosystem evaporation), which was an important part of the budget of the energy system. Canopy interception consumed kinetic energy of raindrops in overcoming resistance of branches and leaves, which collected raindrops, followed with the conversion of potential energy in raindrops to kinetic energy with falling raindrops. In general, the diameter of raindrops from the canopy is larger than that of the raindrops above the canopy as a result of the collection effort by the canopy. The kinetic energy of raindrops from the canopy, therefore, was higher than that of raindrops in the atmosphere. The drop-size distribution from the canopy was affected by the structure of the canopy layer rather than the amount of precipitation and precipitation intensity. The canopy had no important nor efficient effects on decreasing the kinetic energy of raindrops in our case study with a first branch height of 7 m and precipitation amounts over 3 mm. However, the canopy would play a key role in decreasing kinetic energy of raindrops in two cases, that of a small amount of precipitation and one of heavy precipitation intensity, in which the canopy could intercept the largest amount of precipitation in the former condition and the canopy could scatter bigger raindrops to smaller raindrops with striking leaves in the case of heavy precipitation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Best A C (1950). The size distribution of raindrops. Quart J Royal Meteorol, 76(16): 16–36
Cai L J, Wang G D (2003). The effects of the wind vector on the distribution of raindrop kinetic energy over sloping field. J China Agric Univ, 8(6): 15–17 (in Chinese)
Cai L J, Wang G D, Zhang S Q (2003). Kinetic Energy Distribution of Raindrops on Loess Plateau. Bull Water Soil Conserv, 23(4): 28–32 (in Chinese)
Chen Y Z, He F, Zhang H J, Wen X S (2005). Preliminary analysis on factors influencing canopy interception in Jinyun mountain. Sci Soil Water Conserv, 3(3): 318–323 (in Chinese)
Disrud L A (1970). Magnitude, probability and effect of kinetic energy of winds associated with rains in Kansas, Kansas Acad Sci, (73): 237–246
Gong L (2005). Erosion calculation of raindrops’ kinetic energy of Loess Plateau’s rainfall. J Lanzhou Jiaotong Univ, 24(4): 43–45 (in Chinese)
Jiang Z S, Song W J, Li X Y (1983). Characteristics of natural raindrop in Loess Plateau. Water Soil Conserv China, 11(3): 32–36 (in Chinese)
Kinnell P I A (1981). Rainfall intensity-kinetic energy relationship for soil loss prediction. Soil Science Society. Amer Process, 45: 153–155
Laiton L (1980). Liquid Characteristics of Biological System. Beijing: Science Press, 287–290
Lei L D (1994). Study on China’s Forest Ecosystem Location. Harbin: Northeast Forest University Press, 245–251 (in Chinese)
Liu J G, Zhang W J (1985). Transmission of light in canopy. Sci Silv Sin, 21(3): 234–240 (in Chinese)
Qian Y Q, Tao S Y (1998). Distribution of raindrop’s terminal velocity in the Loess Plateau. J Northwest Agric Univ, 26(5): 20–24 (in Chinese)
Salles C, Poesev J, Sempere-Torres D (2002). Kinetic energy of rain and its functional relationship with intensity. J Hydrol, 257(1–4): 257–271
Ulbrich C W, Atlas D (1985). The effects of drop size distribution truncation on rainfall integral parameters and empirical relations. J Climat Appl Meteorol, 24: 580–590
Wang W Z (1987). Study on index of erosivity (R) of rainfall in loess area. Soil Water Conserv China, 15(12): 18–22 (in Chinese)
Wang Y H (1986). A quantitative study on the benefits of block locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) on water and soil conservation in the eastern loess area in Gansu province. J Beijing For Univ, 8(1): 35–42 (in Chinese)
Wei Z X, Li S H (1997). Study on characteristics of different forest canopy interception. Water Soil Conserv China, 25(5): 524–530 (in Chinese)
Wen S Z, Pan W C, Tian D L (1989). Hydrological effects of fir plantation ecosystem. J Central South Univ For Tech, 9(Suppl): 29–36
Xie C H, Guan W B, Wu J G, Cheng G W, Luo J (2002). Interception capability of dark coniferous forest ecosystem in Gongga Mountain. J Beijing For Univ, 24(1): 68–71 (in Chinese)
Xu R (1983). Kinetic energy calculation methods for natural precipitation and artificial precipitation. Water Soil Conserv China, 11(3): 37–39 (in Chinese)
Yao W Y, Tang L Q (2001). Process and Simulation of Water Power Erosion to Sand. Zhengzhou: Yellow River Conservancy Press, 103–109 (in Chinese)
Zhou G Y (1997). Distribution of rainfall kinetic energy by canopies of artificial forest tree species, and its ecological effects. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 21(3): 250–259 (in Chinese)
Zhou G Y, Zen Q B, Huang Q, Chen B F, Wu Z M, Li Y D, Du Z H (1995). Influence of canopy upon rainfall in a regenerative tropical mountain rain forest at Jianfengling of Hainan island. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 19(2): 201–207 (in Chinese)
Zhou P H, Dou B Z, Sun Q F (1981). Primary report on the test of precipitation energy. Bull Water Soil Conserv, 2(1): 51–60 (in Chinese)
Zhu J W, Cui Q W (1982). Theory of light distribution and absorption in relation with forest canopy structure. Sci Silv Sin, 18(3): 258–265 (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
__________
Translated from Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2007, 43(2): 15–20 [译自: 林业科学]
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, W., Deng, X. & Zhao, Z. Effects of canopy interception on energy conversion processes in a Chinese fir plantation ecosystem. Front. For. China 3, 264–270 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11461-008-0053-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11461-008-0053-4