Skip to main content
Log in

The response of key ecosystem services to land use and climate change in Chongqing: Time, space, and altitude

  • Special Issue: Climate Change and Its Regional Response
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mountainous landscapes are particularly vulnerable and sensitive to climate change and human activities, and a clear understanding of how ecosystem services (ES) and their relationships continuously change over time, across space, and along altitude is therefore essential for ecosystem management. Chongqing, a typical mountainous region, was selected to assess the long-term changes in its key ES and their relationships. From 1992 to 2018, the temporal variation in water yield (WY) revealed that the maximum and minimum WYs occurred in 1998 and 2006, which coincided with El Niño-Southern Oscillation and severe drought events, respectively. Soil export (SE) and WY were consistent with precipitation, which reached their highest values in 1998. During this period, carbon storage (CS) and habitat quality (HQ) both decreased significantly. ES in Chongqing showed large variations in altitude. Generally, WY and SE decreased with increasing altitude, while CS and HQ increased. For spatial distribution, WY and SE showed positive trends in the west and negative trends in the east. In regard to CS and HQ, negative trends dominated the area. Persistent tradeoffs between WY and soil conservation (SC) were found at all altitude gradients. The strong synergies between CS and HQ were maintained over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balthazar V, Vanacker V, Molina A et al., 2015. Impacts of forest cover change on ecosystem services in high Andean Mountains. Ecological Indicators, 48: 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J, 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12): 1394–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budyko M I, 1974. Climate and Life. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao W, Yuan X, 2019. Region-county characteristic of spatial-temporal evolution and influencing factor on land use-related CO2 emissions in Chongqing of China, 1997–2015. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231: 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary S, Tshering D, Phuntsho T et al., 2017. Impact of land cover change on a mountain ecosystem and its services: Case study from the Phobjikha valley, Bhutan. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 3(9): 1393314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Wu X, Finlayson B L et al., 2014. Variability and trend in the hydrology of the Yangtze River, China: Annual precipitation and runoff. Journal of Hydrology, 513: 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erb K H, Kastner T, Plutzar C et al., 2018. Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass. Nature, 553(7686): 73–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Bian H, 2019. The impact of the plains afforestation program and alternative land use scenarios on ecosystem services in an urbanizing watershed. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 43: 126373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratzer G, Keeton W S, 2017. Mountain forests and sustainable development: The potential for achieving the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda. Mountain Research and Development, 37(3): 246–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gret-Regamey A, Bebi P, Bishop I D et al., 2008. Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an alpine region. Journal of Environmental Management, 89(3): 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griscom B W, Adams J, Ellis P W et al., 2017. Natural climate solutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(44): 11645–11650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao R, Yu D, Liu Y et al., 2017. Impacts of changes in climate and landscape pattern on ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 579: 718–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall M G, 1948. Rank Correlation Methods. London, UK: Charles Griffin and Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langerwisch F, Václavík T, von Bloh W et al., 2018. Combined effects of climate and land-use change on the provision of ecosystem services in rice agro-ecosystems. Environmental Research Letters, 13(1): 015003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Zheng H, O’Connor P et al., 2021. Time and space catch up with restoration programs that ignore ecosystem service trade-offs. Science Advances, 7(14): eabf8650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Li S, Ouyang Z et al., 2008. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(28): 9477–9482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Pei F, Wen Y et al., 2019. Global urban expansion offsets climate-driven increases in terrestrial net primary productivity. Nature Communications, 10: 5558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann H B, 1945. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica, 13(3): 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengist W, Soromessa T, Legese G, 2020. Ecosystem services research in mountainous regions: A systematic literature review on current knowledge and research gaps. Science of The Total Environment, 702: 134581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne D, Spehn E M, Snethlage M et al., 2017. Opportunities for research on mountain biodiversity under global change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 29: 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu J, Carpenter S R, Booth E G et al., 2018. Understanding relationships among ecosystem services across spatial scales and over time. Environmental Research Letters, 13(5): 054020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirpke U, Kohler M, Leitinger G et al., 2019. Future impacts of changing land-use and climate on ecosystem services of mountain grassland and their resilience. Ecosystem Services, 26: 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirpke U, Timmermann F, Tappeiner U et al., 2016. Cultural ecosystem services of mountain regions: Modelling the aesthetic value. Ecological Indicators, 69: 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl R, Albrich K, Erb K et al., 2019. What drives the future supply of regulating ecosystem services in a mountain forest landscape?. Forest Ecology and Management, 445: 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen P K, 1968. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63(324): 1379–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seto K C, Guneralp B, Hutyra L R, 2012. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40): 16083–16088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp R, Tallis H T, Ricketts T et al., 2014. InVEST 3.3.3 User’s Guide. Stanford, CA, USA: The Natural Capital Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Li F, 2017. Spatiotemporal assessment and trade-offs of multiple ecosystem services based on land use changes in Zengcheng, China. Science of The Total Environment, 609: 1569–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Lu Z, Li F et al., 2018. Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-offs to support the supply of multiple ecosystem services in Beijing, China. Ecological Indicators, 94: 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tappeiner U, Tasser E, Leitinger G et al., 2008. Effects of historical and likely future scenarios of land use on above- and belowground vegetation carbon stocks of an Alpine Valley. Ecosystems, 11(8): 1383–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah S, You Q, Ullah W et al., 2018. Observed changes in precipitation in China-Pakistan economic corridor during 1980–2016. Atmospheric Research, 210: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Dai E, 2020. Spatial-temporal changes in ecosystem services and the trade-off relationship in mountain regions: A case study of Hengduan Mountain region in Southwest China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264: 121573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei W, Chen L, Fu B et al., 2009. Responses of water erosion to rainfall extremes and vegetation types in a loess semiarid hilly area, NW China. Hydrological Processes, 23(12): 1780–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier W, Smith D, 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: A Guide to Conservation Planning. Agriculture Handbooks (USA). Washington, DC, USA: Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Li J, Zhou Z et al., 2021. Response of multiple mountain ecosystem services on environmental gradients: How to respond, and where should be priority conservation? Journal of Cleaner Production, 278: 123264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Zou X, Liu Q et al., 2017. Assessing natural and anthropogenic influences on water discharge and sediment load in the Yangtze River, China. Science of The Total Environment, 607: 920–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongyan Bian.

Additional information

Author: Gao Jie (1986–), Associate Professor, specialized in the ecosystem services, land use change.

Foundation

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41701611, No.41830648; General Program of Social Science and Planning of Chongqing, No.2020YBZX15; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, No.XDJK2019C090

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, J., Bian, H., Zhu, C. et al. The response of key ecosystem services to land use and climate change in Chongqing: Time, space, and altitude. J. Geogr. Sci. 32, 317–332 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1949-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1949-x

Keywords

Navigation