Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimizing water resources allocation in the Haihe River basin under groundwater sustainability constraints

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study applies a hydroeconomic optimization method for water resources management in the highly water stressed Haihe River basin. A multi-objective, multi-temporal deterministic hydroeconomic optimization model has been built to quantify the economic trade-offs and reveal “minimum cost strategies” when reducing groundwater abstraction to sustainable levels. A complex basin representation, with ∼140,000 decision variables is formulated where each decision variable represents a flow-path from a water source to a sink. Available water sources are runoff generated by the sub-basins upstream the nine major surface water reservoirs, the inter-basin transfers from Yellow River and South to North Water Transfer Project (SNWTP) and the natural groundwater recharge to the three main groundwater aquifers. Water demands, i.e. sinks, are aggregated for each model sub-basin in categories of the major agricultural users, domestic, industrial and ecological water demands. Each demand is associated with a curtailment cost and groundwater abstraction with a pumping cost. Groundwater overdraft is constrained in each model scenario, ranging from unlimited overdraft in the plain area groundwater aquifer to sustainable abstractions over an 8-year period. Inflow upstream Yuqiao reservoir, and the inter-basin transfers from SNWTP and Yellow River are identified as the water resources with the highest increase in average shadow prices when limiting groundwater overdraft. An increase in inflow shadow prices of 37.5% indicates that these water sources will be most valuable if sustainable groundwater abstraction should be achieved. The shadow prices of water sources reveal when and where in the Haihe River basin users are curtailed if water resources are managed in the most optimal way. Average shadow prices of 1.6 yuan/m3 for all surface water sources in the sustainable abstraction scenarios shows that overdraft can be avoided by curtailment of users with a willingness-to-pay ≤1.6 yuan/m3. The shadow prices of the existing surface water reservoirs represented in the model shows that no costs can be saved from expanding their capacities. Finally, the cost of achieving sustainable groundwater abstraction with present water resource availability is found to be minimum 8.2 billion yuan/year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D et al., 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No.56, FAO, (56): 300.

  • Bras R L, Buchanan R, Curry K C, 1983. Real time adaptive closed loop control of reservoirs with the High Aswan Dam as a case study. Water Resources Research, 19(1): 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright E A, Rose A N, Urban M L et al., 2017. lspop2016. Landscan 2016. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory SE — July 1, 2017. http://www.ornl.gov/landscan/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai J B, Liu Y, Xu D et al., 2009. Simulation of the soil water balance of wheat using daily weather forecast messages to estimate the reference evapotranspiration. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13(7): 1045–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, McKinney D C, Lasdon L S, 2001. Solving Nonlinear Water Management Models Using a Combined Genetic Algorithm and Linear Programming Approach. Advances in Water Resources, 24(6): 667–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC), 2016. The 13th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China, viewed 13/02/2018. http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201612/P020161207645765233498.pdf.

  • Chen M, Tomas R, Li Z et al., 2016. Imaging land subsidence induced by groundwater extraction in Beijing (China) using satellite radar interferometry. Remote Sensing, 8(6): 468–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng W-C, Hsu N-S, Cheng W-M et al., 2009. A flow path model for regional water distribution optimization. Water Resources Research, 45(9). doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007826.

  • China Meteorological Administration (CMA), 2017. Dataset of daily climate data from Chinese surface stations for global exchange (V3.0), viewed 03/02/2017. http://data.cma.cn/en/?r=data/detail&dataCode=SURF_CLI_CHN_ MUL_ DAY_CES_V3.0.

  • China Statistical Yearbook (CSY), 2011. China Statistical Yearbook — Water supply and water use, viewed 17/02/2016. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2011/indexeh.htm.

  • China Statistical Yearbook, 2015a. China Statistical Yearbook — Table of Sown Area of Farm Crops, viewed 17/02/2016. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2015/indexeh.htm.

  • China Statistical Yearbook, 2015b. China Statistical Yearbook — Main indicators of state-owned and state-holding industrial enterprises by region, viewed 17/02/2016. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2015/indexeh.htm.

  • China Statistical Yearbook, 2015c. China Statistical Yearbook — Main indicators of private industrial enterprises by region, viewed 17/02/2016. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2015/indexeh.htm.

  • China Statistical Yearbook, 2015d. China Statistical Yearbook — Water supply and water use, viewed 17/02/2016. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2015/indexeh.htm.

  • Davidsen C, Liu S, Mo X et al., 2015a. Hydroeconomic optimization of reservoir management under downstream water quality constraints. Journal of Hydrology, 529: 1679–1689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsen C, Liu S, Mo X et al., 2016. The cost of ending groundwater overdraft on the North China Plain. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20(2):771–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsen C, Pereira-Cardenal S J, Liu S et al., 2015b. Using stochastic dynamic programming to support water resources management in the Ziya River Basin, China. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 141(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000482.

  • Ding Y, Shan B, Zhao Y, 2015. Assessment of river habitat quality in the Hai River Basin, northern China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(9): 11699–11717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng W, Min Z, Lemoine J-M et al., 2013. Evaluation of groundwater depletion in North China using the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data and ground-based measurements. Water Resources Research, 49: 2110–2118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Q, Zhao K, Liu D et al., 2016. The application of a water rights trading model based on two-stage interval-parameter stochastic programming. Water Resources Management, 30(7): 2227–2243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan H, Wang L, Ni H-Z et al., 2008. Assessment on methods for calculating economic value of Water. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 39(11): 1160–1166. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Duan A, Sun J et al., 2009. Crop coefficient and water-use efficiency of winter wheat/spring maize strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 111(1/2): 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of the People’s Republic of China (GOV PRC), 2015. Water Ten Plan, viewed 31/10/2017. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-04/16/content_9613.htm. (in Chinese)

  • Guan D, Hubacek K, 2008. A new and integrated hydro-economic accounting and analytical framework for water resources: A case study for North China. Journal of Environmental Management, 88: 1300–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H2O China, 2017. H2O China Water Prices, viewed 31/10/2017. http://price.h2o-china.com/. (in Chinese)

  • Harou J J, Pulido-Velazque M, Rosenberg D E et al., 2009. Hydro-economic models: Concepts, design, applications and future prospects. Journal of Hydrology, 375: 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong S, Jun X, Junxu C et al., 2017. Multi-object approach and its application to adaptive water management under climate change. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27(3): 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labadie J W, 2004. Optimal operation of multireservoir systems: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 130(2): 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner B, Liermann, C R, Revenga C et al., 2011. High resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river flow management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(9). doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/100125.

  • Li L X, Gan H, Wang L et al., 2008. Calculation and analysis of the economic value of water resource. Journal of Natural Resources, 23(3): 494–499. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X Y, Li F F, Qiu J, 2017. A new evaluation for water transfer optimal schemes with the consideration of reliability, stability, and severity. Water Resources Management, 31: 2823–2836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Zheng C, Zheng L et al., 2008. Ground water sustainability: Methodology and application to the North China Plain. Ground Water, 46(6):897–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Cai X, Guo S, 2011. Deriving multiple near-optimal solutions to deterministic reservoir operation problems. Water Resources Research, 47(8). doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010998.

  • Liu S, Mo X, Lin Z et al., 2010. Crop yield responses to climate change in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China. Agricultural Water Management, 97(8): 1195–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Teixeira J L, Zhang H J et al., 1998. Model validation and crop coefficients for irrigation scheduling in the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management, 36: 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Yi L, 2010. A consolidated evaluation of the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient approach using the lysimeter data in the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management, 97: 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks D P, van Beek E, Stedinger J R et al., 2005. Water Resources Systems Planning and Management: An Introduction to Methods, Models and Applications. UNESCO Publishing.

  • Martinsen G, 2019. Hydroeconomic evaluation of projects and policies in the water-scarce and polluted Haihe River Basin, China [D]. Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture (MA), 2010. No. 1 Central Document for 2011, viewed 31/10/2017. http://english.agri.gov.cn/hottopics/cpc/201301/t20130115_9544.htm.

  • Ministry of Water Resources (MWR), 2016. Hydrological data of Haihe River basin, data books with daily discharge data. Annual Hydrological Report, 1971–2014, Beijing, China.

  • Mo X, Chen X, Hu S et al.. 2017. Attributing regional trends of evapotranspiration and gross primary productivity with remote sensing: A case study in the North China Plain. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21: 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittman K, Hansen M C, Becker-Reshef I et al., 2010. Estimating global cropland extent with multi-year MODIS data. Remote Sensing, 2(7): 1844–1863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin C B, Jia Y W, Su Z et al., 2014. An analysis of water consumption and pollution with the input-output model in the Haihe River Basin, China. Advanced Materials Research, 864–867: 1059–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg D E, 2015. Blended near-optimal alternative generation, visualization, and interaction for water resources decision making. Water Resources Research, 51: 2047–2063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu Y, Villholth K G, Jensen K H et al., 2012. Integrated hydrological modeling of the North China Plain: Options for sustainable groundwater use in the alluvial plain of Mt. Taihang. Journal of Hydrology, 464/465: 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinshouer D W, Qiang J, McCabe P J et al., 1990. Maps showing geology, oil and gas fields, and geologic provinces of the Asia Pacific Region. United States Geological Survey. Open File Report 97-470F: pp16.

  • Sun H, Shao L, Liu X et al., 2012. Determination of water consumption and the water-saving potential of three mulching methods in a Jujube Orchard. European Journal of Agronomy, 43(87): 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thenkabail P S, Knox J W, Ozdogan M et al., 2012. Assessing future risks to agricultural productivity, water resources and food security: How can remote sensing help? Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, (Special Issue on Global Croplands: Highlight Article), 78(8): 773–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilmant A, Pinte D, Goor Q, 2008. Assessing marginal water values in multipurpose multireservoir systems via stochastic programming. Water Resources Research, 44(12). doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007024.

  • United Nations, 1992. The Dublin statement on water and sustainable development. From the International conference on water and the environment, viewed 10/01/2016. http://www.un-documents.net/h2o-dub.htm.

  • United States Geological Survey, 2017. Shuttle radar topography mission data. downloaded from earth explorer with courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey, viewed 15/04/2017. https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.

  • Wang X, Cui Q, Li S, 2012. An optimal water allocation model based on water resources security assessment and its application in Zhangjiakou region, northern China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 69: 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Sun Y, Song L et al., 2009. An eco-environmental water demand based model for optimizing water resources using hybrid genetic simulated annealing algorithms. Part II. Model application and results. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(8): 2612–2619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Zhang J, Yang Z et al., 2015. Historic water consumptions and future management strategies for Haihe River Basin of northern China. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20(3): 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z M, Zhang B, Li X Y et al., 2006. Using CropSyst to simulate spring wheat growth in black soil zone of Northeast China. Pedosphere, 16(3): 354–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng S Q, Huang G H, Li Y P, 2010. An integrated scenario-based multi-criteria decision support system for water resources management and planning: A case study in the Haihe River Basin. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12): 8242–8254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, 2001. Agenda for water sector strategy for North China — Volume 2: Main report. Report no. 22040-CHA.

  • Yang Y, Yang T, Moiwo J P et al., 2010. Agricultural water management estimation of irrigation requirement for sustainable water resources reallocation in North China. Agricultural Water Management, 97: 1711–1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young R A, 2005. Determining the Economic Value of Water: Concepts and Methods. Resources for the Future, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, 2008. Water balance modeling over variable time scales based on the Budyko Framework: Model development and testing. Journal of Hydrology, 360: 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Chen S, Sun H et al., 2011. Changes in evapotranspiration over irrigated winter wheat and maize in North China Plain over three decades. Agricultural Water Management, 98(6): 1097–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Li G, 2013. Long-term evolution of cones of depression in shallow aquifers in the North China Plain. Water, 5: 677–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Drake S, Lü H et al., 2010. Analysis of temporal and spatial differences in eco-environmental carrying capacity related to water in the Haihe River Basin, China. Water Resources Management, 24: 1089–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China

    Grith Martinsen, Suxia Liu & Xingguo Mo

  2. Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

    Grith Martinsen & Peter Bauer-Gottwein

  3. College of Resources and Environment/Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Grith Martinsen, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo & Peter Bauer-Gottwein

  4. Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark

    Grith Martinsen & Peter Bauer-Gottwein

Authors
  1. Grith Martinsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suxia Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xingguo Mo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Bauer-Gottwein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suxia Liu.

Additional information

Foundation: National Key Research and Development Program of China, No.2016YFC0401402; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41471026

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martinsen, G., Liu, S., Mo, X. et al. Optimizing water resources allocation in the Haihe River basin under groundwater sustainability constraints. J. Geogr. Sci. 29, 935–958 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1638-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1638-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation