Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comprehensive methods for measuring regional multidimensional development and their applications in China

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

National and international research on regional development has matured from the use of single elements and indicators to the application of comprehensive multi-element and multi-indicator measures. We selected 12 indicators from six dimensions for analysis in this study, including income, consumption, education, population urbanization, traffic, and indoor living facilities. We then proposed the polyhedron method to comprehensively measure levels of regional multidimensional development. We also enhanced the polygon and vector sum methods to render them more suitable for studying the status of regional multidimensional development. Finally, we measured levels of regional multidimensional development at county, city, and provincial scales across China and analyzed spatial differences using the three methods above and the weighted sum method applied widely. The results of this study reveal the presence of remarkable regional differences at the county scale across China in terms of single and multidimensional levels of regional development. Analyses show that values of the regional multidimensional development index (RMDI) are high in eastern coastal areas, intermediate in the midlands and in northern border regions, and low in the southwest and in western border regions. Districts characterized by enhanced and the highest levels of this index are distributed in eastern coastal areas, including cities in central and western regions, as well as areas characterized by the development of energy and mineral resources. The regional distribution of reduced and the lowest levels of this index is consistent with concentrations of areas that have always been impoverished. Correlation analyses of the results generated by the four methods at provincial, city, and county scales show that all are equivalent in practical application and can be used to generate satisfactory measures for regional multidimensional development. Additional correlation analyses between RMDI values calculated using the polyhedron method and per capita gross domestic product (GDP) demonstrate that the latter is not a meaningful proxy for the level of regional multidimensional development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro R J, Lee J W, 2010. A new data set of educational attainment in the World, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104: 184–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ediger V S, Tatlidil H, 2006. Energy as an indicator of human development: A statistical approach. The Journal of Energy and Development, 31(2): 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Jie, 2015. Draft of major function oriented zoning of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(2): 186–201. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Chuanglin, Mao Hanying, 1999. A system of indicators for regional development planning. Acta Geographica Sinica, 54(5): 410–419. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu Wei, Zhao Junquan, Du Guozhen, 2014. The evaluation of resources sustainable utilization: Based on empirical analysis of resources welfare index. Journal of Natural Resources, 29(11): 1902–1914. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda-Parr S, Lawson-Remer T, Randolph S, 2010. An index of economic and social rights fulfilment: Concept and methodology. Journal of Human Rights, 8(3): 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith J K, 1958. The Affluent Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm M, Harttgen K, Klasen S et al., 2008. A human development index by income groups. World Development, 36(12): 2527–2546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin F J, Wang C J, Li X W et al., 2010. China’s regional transport dominance: Density, proximity, and accessibility. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20(2): 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X J, Luo Q, Hai B B et al., 2016. Progress in the micro-perspective studies of economic geography in China since 1980s. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(8): 1041–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang Hong, 1994. Applicable appraise for population quality life index. Chinese Journal of Social Medicine, 6: 12–13, 16. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Yifu, Liu Peilin, 2003. Chinese development strategy and economic convergence. Economic Research Journal, 3: 19–25, 89. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Hui, 2006. Regional inequality measurement: methods and evaluations. Geographical Research, 25(4): 710–718. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W D, Song Z Y, Liu Z G, 2016. Progress of economic greography in China’s mainland since 2000. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(8): 1019–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y H, Xu Y, 2015. A geographic identification of multidimensional poverty in rural China under the framework of sustainable livelihoods analysis. Applied Geography, 73: 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Kangqiang, 2012. Component equilibrium: An improved composite method and its empirical test for HDI. Statistical Research, 29(10): 45–51. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbubul H, 1999. Reflections on Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan E J, 1967. The Cost of Economic Growth. London: Staples Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris M D, 1978. A physical quality of life index. Urban Ecology, 3(3): 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh F, 1998. A modified Human development index. World Development, 26(3): 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M C, 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan R, Sanyal G S, 2011. Good governance and human development: Evidence from Indian States. Journal of Social and Development Science, 1(1): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvati L, Venanzoni G, Carlucci M, 2016. Towards (spatially) unbalanced development? A joint assessment of regional disparities in socioeconomic and territorial variables in Italy. Land Use Policy, 51: 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A, 1991. Welfare, preference, and freedom. Journal of Econometrics, 50(1/2): 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva R, Ferreira-Lopes A, 2014. A regional development index for Portugal. Social Indicators Research, 118: 1055–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP, 1990. Human Development Report 1990. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The State Council, 2010. National Major Function Zoning. The State Council Article No.46 in 2010. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, 1954. Report on International Definition and Measurement of Standards and Levels of Living. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Xiaolu, Fan Gang, 2004. Analysis on the regional disparity in China and the influential factors. Economic Research Journal, (1): 33–44. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Yong, Fan Jie, 2014. Index system for regional development disparity measurement. Progress in Geography, 33(9): 1159–1166. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China

    Yong Xu & Jian Duan

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Yong Xu & Jian Duan

  3. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water and Soil Conservation and Environmental Protection, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi, 276000, Shandong, China

    Xiaoren Xu

Authors
  1. Yong Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jian Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoren Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoren Xu.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41171449; Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.KZZD-EW-06

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Duan, J. & Xu, X. Comprehensive methods for measuring regional multidimensional development and their applications in China. J. Geogr. Sci. 28, 1182–1196 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1549-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1549-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation