Skip to main content
Log in

Spatio-temporal difference analysis of cultivated land use intensity based on emergy in the Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone of China

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taking the emergy requirements of the five input indexes as the foundation, this paper analyzes the total temporal and spatial changes in cultivated land use intensity in the Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone from 2000 to 2010. The results are obtained as follows: (1) Over a period of 10 years, the cultivated land use intensity has increased exponentially in the Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone; agricultural machinery intensity has been the largest proportion of the total inputs, comprising more than 99.50% and increasing year by year, which indicates that agricultural mechanization is a basic trend in agricultural development in the Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone. (2) The total number of counties belonging to the moderate- and low- intensity cultivated land use categories is the largest, while the number of counties belonging to the high-intensity cultivated land use and extensive cultivated land use categories is the smallest. (3) This zone can be divided into five areas: an eastern area of high-intensity cultivated land use, a central and eastern area of low-intensity cultivated land use, a central area of low-intensity cultivated land use, a southern area of moderate-intensity cultivated land use, and a northern area of moderate-intensity cultivated land use. (4) The counties which had a coordinated development between cultivated land use intensity and their socio-economic development level increase year by year, and the socio-economic development level had increasingly obvious effects on the cultivated land use intensity. Finally, this paper presents suggestions for the development of cultivated land use intensity in the Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone, especially for different levels of intensity among counties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brookfield H C, 1972. Intensification and disintensification in Pacific agriculture. Pacific Viewpoint, 13 (1): 30–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao Guangqiao, Zhou Li, Yi Zhongyi et al., 2010. Influence of the policy of subsidy for purchasing agricultural machinery to peasant household: Based on the empirical analysis of rice planting in Jiangsu Province. Chinese Rural Economy, (6): 38–48. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Yuqi, Li Xiubin, 2009. Structural change of agricultural land use intensity and its regional disparity in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(4): 469–478. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • He Ruhai, 2006. A study on harmonization of rural labor force transfer and farmland conversion [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Insa Kühling, Gabriele Broll, Dieter Trautz, 2016. Spatio-temporal analysis of agricultural land-use intensity across the Western Siberian grain belt. Science of the Total Environment, 544: 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong Xiangbin, Li Cuizhen, Wang Hongyu et al., 2010. Analysis on arable land intensity difference at plot scale in Jingji Plain. Transactions of the CSAE, 26(Suppl.2): 331–337. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E F, Rounsevell M D A, Geist H J, 2000. Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 82: 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan Shengfang, Qin Peiyuan, Lu Hongfang, 2002. Emergy Analysis of Ecological-Economic System. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Guangdong, Fang Chuanglin, Pang Bo, 2014. Quantitative measuring and influencing mechanism of urban and rural land intensive use in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24 (5): 858–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Xiubin, Zhu Huiyi, Tan Minghong et al., 2008. Measurement of land use intensity. Progress in Geography, 27(6): 12–17. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Zijun, Yu Xiaokang, Gong Canjuan, 2013. Intensity change in cultivated land use in Shandong Province from 1980 to 2010. ScienceDirect, 5: 140–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Chengwu, Li Xiubin, 2006. The changing characteristics of the agricultural land use intensity in China based on the production cost. Journal of Natural Resources, 21(1): 9–15. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Luo, Xu Xinliang, Liu Jiyuan et al., 2015. Impact of farmland changes on production potential in China during 1990–2010. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(1): 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luis P Amaral, Nélson Martins, Joaquim B Gouvveia, 2016. A review of emergy theory, its application and its developments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54: 882–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Land and Resources (MLR), P.R.C., 2005. China Land and Resources Statistical Yearbook (2005). Beijing: Geological Publishing House. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Land and Resources (MLR), P.R.C., 2009. China Land and Resources Statistical Yearbook (2009). Beijing: Geological Publishing House. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC), 2010. China Statistical Yearbook (2009). Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum H T, 1996. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raleigh Barlowe. Translated by Gu Shuzhong et al., 1989. Land Resources Economics: The Economics of Real Estate. Beijing: Beijing Agricultural University Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriar A J, 2005. Determinants of agricultural intensity index “scores” in a frontier region: An analysis of data from northern Guatemala. Agriculture and Human Values, 22: 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Jianan, Jin Xiaobin, Zhou Yinkang, 2010. A study on the contribution rate of agricultural land use intensity to grain productivity based on hierarchical linear models: A case study on the Inner Mongolia. Resources Science, 32(6): 1161–1168. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistic Bureau of Jiangxi, 2001–2011. Investigation Leading Group of Jiangxi, National Bureau of Statistics of China. Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook: 2001–2011. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Maohua, 2007. Rural labor force transfer under the dual constraints of cost-benefit. Chinese Rural Economy, (10): 30. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Guogang, Liu Yansui, Li Yurui et al., 2015. Dynamic trends and driving forces of land use intensification of cultivated land in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(1): 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Qian, Jin Xiaobin, Zhou Yinkang et al., 2011. Spatial differences and its driving factors of emergy indices on cultivated land eco-economic system in Hebei Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(1): 247–256. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie Hualin, Liu Guiying, 2015. Spatiotemporal differences and influencing factors of multiple cropping index in China during 1998–2012. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(11): 1283–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Hualin, Zou Jinlang, Jiang Hailing et al., 2014. Spatiotemporal pattern and driving forces of arable land-use intensity in China: Toward sustainable land management using emergy analysis. Sustainability, (6): 3504–3520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Hui, Huang Xianjin, Zhao Rongqin et al., 2011. Study on the emergy analysis and efficiency and sustainability evaluation of the coastal region cultivated land system in Jiangsu Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 26(2): 247–258. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan Xuanzhou, Ou Yizhi, Ji Yu, 2011. Effect analysis of implementing the policy of subsidy for purchasing agricultural machinery in Jiangxi Province. Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, (5): 28–31. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Huaisen ed., 1992. Agricultural Ecology. Beijing: Agriculture Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Weiwei, Li Hong, Huo Xiaoni et al., 2009. Agricultural land use intensity based on emergy analysis. Transactions of the CSAE, 25(7): 204–211. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Xiaohong, Zhang Rong, Wu Jun et al., 2016. An emergy evaluation of the sustainability of Chinese crop production system during 2000–2010. Ecological Indicators, 60: 622–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Jing, Yang Gangqiao, 2010. Canonical correlation analysis on the influencing factors of the change of cultivated land intensive use degree. China Population, Resources and Environment, 20 (10): 103–109. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Huiyi, Li Xiubin, Xin Liangjie, 2007. Intensity change in cultivated land use in China and its policy implications. Journal of Natural Resources, 22(6): 907–915. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yafen He.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41561040; Key Project of National Social Science Foundation of China, No.15AZD075; Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.71233004; Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province No.20143ACB21023; Technology Foundation of Jiangxi Education Department of China, No.KJLD14033; Fok Ying-Tung Fund, No.141084

Xie Hualin (1979–), PhD and Professor, specialized in land use and eco-security.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, H., He, Y., Zou, J. et al. Spatio-temporal difference analysis of cultivated land use intensity based on emergy in the Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone of China. J. Geogr. Sci. 26, 1412–1430 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1335-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1335-7

Keywords

Navigation