Skip to main content
Log in

A case study of strut-free excavation retaining system

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a successful design of a strut-free excavation retaining system, namely the TPKE project. The TPKE excavation project was 13.2 m deep, covering approximately 127 × 105 m which is considered as a large excavation. Considering the cost saving and construction period shortening, the configurations of the diaphragm walls, buttress walls, cross walls, and the capping slab were used to design a strut-free excavation retaining system. This is feasible through the three-dimensional finite element analysis. This project was successfully completed with the maximum diaphragm wall deflection to the excavation depth ratio of 0.25%. A set of parametric studies was conducted to investigate the mechanism of this retaining system. For reducing wall deflections, it can be concluded that increasing the number of cross walls and increasing the length of the buttress walls was more effective than increasing the number of buttress walls. Moreover, increasing the depth of buttress walls below the excavation level was insignificant to reduce wall deflections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

Data will be made available on reasonable request.

References

  1. ACI 318–14 (2014) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14). ACI Committee 318. Farmington Hills, MI, USA, pp 513

  2. Calvello M, Finno RJ (2004) Selecting parameters to optimize in model calibration by inverse analysis. Comput Geotech 31(5):410–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsiung BCB, Chung LJ, Lin MC (2020) Case record of phase 1 of Kaohsiung metro –geotechnical design and construction of a large-scale underground station. J GeoEng 15(4):205–214. https://doi.org/10.6310/jog.202012_15(4).4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsieh HS, Wu LH, Lin TM, Cherng JC, Hsu WT (2011) Performance of T-shaped diaphragm wall in a large scale excavation. J GeoEng 6(3):135–144. https://doi.org/10.6310/jog.2011.6(3).3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsieh PG, Ou CY (1998) Shape of ground surface settlement profiles caused by excavation. Can Geotech J 35(6):1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsieh PG, Ou CY, Hsieh WH (2016) Efficiency of excavations with buttress walls in reducing the deflection of the diaphragm wall. Acta Geotech 11(5):1087–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0416-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsieh PG, Ou CY (2018) Mechanism of buttress walls in restraining the wall deflection caused by deep excavation. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 82:542–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaky J (1944) The coefficient of earth pressure at rest. J Soc Hung Archit Eng 78(22):355–358

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khoiri M, Ou CY (2013) Evaluation of deformation parameter for deep excavation in sand through case histories. Comput Geotech 47(1):57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin PY, Chang TK, Ho SK, Ho SP (2017) Excavation without internal support and its implications in construction management: a case study. J GeoEng 12(2):81–88. https://doi.org/10.6310/jog.2017.12(2).4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim A, Ou CY, Hsieh PG (2010) Evaluation of clay constitutive models for analysis of deep excavation under undrained conditions. J GeoEng 5(1):9–20. https://doi.org/10.6310/jog.2010.5(1).2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim A, Ou CY (2018) Performance and three-dimensional analyses of a wide excavation in soft soil with strut free retaining system. Int J Geomech 18(9):05018007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim A, Ou CY, Hsieh PG (2020) A novel strut-free retaining wall system for deep excavation in soft clay: numerical study. Acta Geotech 15(6):1557–1576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00851-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim A, Ou CY (2020) Performance of cross and buttress walls to control wall deflection induced by deep excavation in dense urban area. Geotech Eng J SEAGS AGSSEA 51:44–51

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ou CY, Chiou DC, Wu TS (1996) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of deep excavations. J Geotech Eng 122(5):337–345. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:5(337)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ou CY (2016) Finite element analysis of deep excavation problems. J GeoEng 11(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.6310/jog.2016.11(1).1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schanz T, Vermeer PA, Bonnier PG (1999) The hardening soil model: formulationand verification. In: Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics. PLAXIS Internation

  18. Zeng CF, Song WW, Xue XL, Li MK, Bai N, Mei GX (2021) Construction dewatering in a metro station incorporating buttress retaining wall to limit ground settlement: Insights from experimental modelling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 116:104124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng CF, Powrie W, Xue XL, Li MK, Mei GX (2021) Effectiveness of a buttress wall in reducing retaining wall movement during dewatering before bulk excavation. Acta Geotech 16:3253–3267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01179-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zeng CF, Xue XL, Li MK (2021) Use of cross wall to restrict enclosure movement during dewatering inside a metro pit before soil excavation. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 112:103909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103909

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [grant number MOST 106-2221-E-146-002].

Funding

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tzu-Yuan Yeh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeh, TY., Ou, CY. & Lim, A. A case study of strut-free excavation retaining system. Acta Geotech. 17, 5557–5571 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01526-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01526-4

Keywords

Navigation