Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating a new method for simultaneous measurement of soil water retention and shrinkage curves

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water retention and shrinkage curves are two important characteristics of unsaturated soils. Conventionally, two curves are separately measured using multiple carefully prepared “identical” soil specimens. However, it is difficult or impossible to fabricate soil specimens with exactly identical stress history. The measurement of two curves was very time-consuming (each up to several weeks). Recently, a new method has been proposed to simultaneously measure two curves through shrinkage tests. The soil suction, water content, and volume during testing are monitored during testing for the construction of the water retention and shrinkage curves. Preliminary shrinkage test results prove that the new method is efficient in the measurement of two curves. In this study, a series of shrinkage tests on two types of soils were performed to evaluate this new method using a new device in which the soil suction, water content, and volume are, respectively, measured using a high-capacity tensiometer, digital balance, and a non-contact photogrammetric method. Test results indicate that the new method significantly reduces the time required for the measurement of two curves from weeks to 1 day. The new method allows simultaneous determination of the two curves using one single soil specimen, which also eliminates the influence of different stress histories on the test results. The axial strain distribution during drying can also be identified based on the reconstructed three-dimensional model of the soil, which is beneficial for examining the soil deformation non-uniformity and stress history. Finally, some discussions on the measurement of two curves using the new method are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM D427 (1998) Standard test method for shrinkage factors of soils by the mercury method. In: 1998 annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

  2. ASTM D4943-08 (2002) Standard test method for shrinkage factors of soils by the wax method. In: 2002 annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

  3. Bensallam S, Bahi L, Ejjaaouani H, Shakhirev V (2012) Shrinkage curve: experimental study and modelling. Int J Eng 25(3):203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhandari AR, Powrie W, Harkness RM (2012) A digital image-based deformation measurement system for triaxial tests. Geotech Test J 35(2):209–226

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boso M, Romero E, Tarantino A (2003) The use of different suction measurement techniques to determine water retention curves. In: Schanz T (ed) Unsaturated soils: experimental studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 171–181

    Google Scholar 

  6. Braudeau E, Costantini JM, Bellier G, Colleuille H (1999) New device and method for soil shrinkage curve measurement and characterization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63(3):525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Briaud JL, Zhang X, Moon S (2003) Shrink test-water content method for shrink and swell predictions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(7):590–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bulut R, Lytton RL, Wray WK (2001) Soil suction measurements by filter paper. In: Expansive clay soils and vegetative influence on shallow foundations, ASCE Geotechnical special publication, pp 243–261

  9. Colmenares JE, Ridley AM (2002) Stress-strain and strength relationships for a reconstituted clayey silt. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on unsaturated soils vol 2, pp 481–484

  10. Cresswell HP, Green TW, McKenzie NJ (2008) The adequacy of pressure plate apparatus for determining soil water retention. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72(1):41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cunningham M (2000) The mechanical behavior of a reconstituted unsaturated soil. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London

  12. Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H (1993) Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Fredlund DG, Zhang F (2013) Combination of shrinkage curve and soil-water characteristic curves for soils that undergo volume change as soil suction is increased. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Paris, France, Sept 2–6, ISSMGE, London, pp 1109–1112

  14. Fredlund DG, Houston SL (2013) Interpretation of soil-water characteristic curves when volume change occurs as soil suction is changed. In: Advances in unsaturated soils, proceedings of the 1st Pan American conference on unsaturated soils, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, 20–23 Feb. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 15–31

  15. Fredlund MD, Wilson GW, Fredlund DG (2002) Representation and estimation of the shrinkage curve. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on unsaturated soils, UNSAT 2002, pp 145–149

  16. Gao Y, Sun DA, Zhu Z, Xu Y (2018) Hydromechanical behavior of unsaturated soil with different initial densities over a wide suction range. Acta Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0662-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gee G, Campbell M, Campbell G, Campbell J (1992) Rapid measurement of low soil potentials using a water activity meter. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1068–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guan Y, Fredlund DG (1997) Use of tensile strength of water for the direct measurement of high soil suction. Can Geotech J 34(4):604–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hilf JW (1956) An investigation of pore water pressure in compacted cohesive soils. US Bureau of Reclamation Tech. Mem. 654. US Bureau of Reclamation, Denver

  20. Jain S, Wang Y, Fredlund DG (2015) Non-contact sensing system to measure specimen volume during shrinkage test. Geotech Test J 38(6):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Le TT, Cui YJ, Muñoz JJ, Delage P, Tang AM, Li XL (2011) Studying the stress–suction coupling in soils using an oedometer equipped with a high capacity tensiometer. Front Archit Civ Eng China 5(2):160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leong EC, Tripathy S, Rahardjo H (2004) A modified pressure plate apparatus. Geotech Test J 27(3):322–331

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li L, Zhang X (2015) A new triaxial testing system for unsaturated soil characterization. Geotech Test J 38(6):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li L, Zhang X (2014) Development of a new high-suction tensiometer. In: Soil behavior and geomechanics, Geo-shanghai 2014, 26–28 May. Shanghai, China, pp 416–425

  25. Li L, Collins R, Zhang X, Wei H (2014) A photogrammetric method to evaluate the erosiveness of Fairbanks silt with different treatments. In: International symposium of climatic effects on pavement and geotechnical infrastructure 2013, ASCE. Reston, VA, pp 176–182

  26. Li L, Zhang X, Chuang L (2015) Development of an oedometer cell with suction measurement ability. In: Innovative materials and design for sustainable transportation infrastructure, pp 179–188

  27. Lourenço SD, Gallipoli ND, Toll DG, Augarde CE, Evans FD (2011) A new procedure for the determination of soil-water retention curves by continuous drying using high-suction tensiometers. Can Geotech J 48(2):327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Madsen HB, Jensen CR, Boysen T (1986) A comparison of the thermocouple psychrometer and the pressure plate methods for determination of soil water characteristic curves. Eur J Soil Sci 37(3):357–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McKeen RG (1985) Validation of procedures for pavement design on expansive soils. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Report No. DOT/FAA/PM-85/15, Program Engineering and Maintenance Service, Washington

  30. Merel AP, Farres PJ (1998) The monitoring of soil surface development using analytical photogrammetry. Photogramm Rec 16(92):331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mikhail EM, Bethel JS, McGlone JC (2001) Introduction to modern photogrammetry. Wiley, New York. ISBN 0-471-30924-9

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nelson JD, Miller DJ (1992) Expansive soils: problems and practice in foundation and pavement design. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Perko HA, Thompson RW, Nelson JD (2000) Suction compression index based on CLOD test results. Geotechnical Special Publication, pp 393–408

  34. Péron H, Hueckel T, Laloui L (2007) An improved volume measurement for determining soil water retention curves. Geotech Test J 30(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  35. Puppala AJ, Katha B, Hoyos LR (2004) Volumetric shrinkage strain measurements in expansive soils using digital imaging technology. Geotech Test J 27(6):547–556

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ridley AM, Burland JB (1993) A New instrument for the measurement of soil moisture suction. Géotechnique 43(2):321–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Romero E, Gens A, Lloret A (1999) Water permeability, water retention and microstructure of unsaturated compacted Boom clay. Eng Geol 54(1–2):117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sander T, Gerke HH (2007) Noncontact shrinkage curve determination for soil clods and aggregates by three-dimensional optical scanning. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71(5):1448–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stone J, Fredlund DG, Sedgwick A, Stianson J (2011) Determination of water storage and permeability functions for oil sands tailings. In: Proceedings of the international conference on tailings and mine waste, Vancouver, Canada

  40. Sun Y, Ren S, Ren T, Minasny B (2010) A in conjunction frequency domain and tensiometer sensor for determining soil water characteristic curves. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74(2):492–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Take WA, Bolton MD (2003) Tensiometer saturation and the reliable measurement of matric suction. Geotechnique 53(2):159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tariq AUR, Durnford DS (1993) Soil volumetric shrinkage measurements: a simple method. Soil Sci 155(5):325–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Toker N, Germaine J, Sjoblom K, Culligan P (2004) A new technique for rapid measurement of continuous soil moisture characteristic curves. Geotechnique 54(3):179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Toll DG, Asquith JD, Fraser A, Hassan AA, Liu G, Lourenço SDN, Mendes J, Noguchi J, Osinski P, Stirling R (2015) Tensiometer techniques for determining soil water retention curves. In: Unsaturated soil mechanics-from theory to practice: proceedings of the 6th Asia Pacific conference on unsaturated soils, Guilin, China, 23–26 October 2015. CRC Press, p 15

  45. Zhang X, Briaud JL (2008) Improved approach to construct constitutive surfaces for stable-structured soils covering both saturated and unsaturated conditions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(6):876–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang X, Li L, Chen G, Lytton RL (2015) A Photogrammetry-based method to measure total and local volume changes of unsaturated soils during triaxial testing. Acta Geotech 10(1):55–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang X, Mavroulidou M, Gunn MJ (2017) A study of the water retention curve of lime-treated London Clay. Acta Geotech 12(1):23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the great help from Eric’s machine shop at University of Alaska Fairbanks for the fabrication of the testing device. We also thank the reviewers for their constructive and insightful comments and suggestions. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51709088).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Rd, Nanjing, 210037, People’s Republic of China

    Lin Li

  2. Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 65409-0030, USA

    Xiong Zhang

  3. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, 710064, Shaanxi, China

    Peng Li

Authors
  1. Lin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Zhang, X. & Li, P. Evaluating a new method for simultaneous measurement of soil water retention and shrinkage curves. Acta Geotech. 14, 1021–1035 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0713-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0713-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation