Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A numerical Round Robin on tunnels under seismic actions

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the seismic behaviour of shallow circular tunnels in soft ground is generally safer than aboveground structures, some tunnels were recently damaged during earthquakes. In some cases, damage was associated with strong ground shaking and site amplification, which increased the stress level in the tunnel lining. Pseudo-static and simplified dynamic analyses enable to assess transient changes in internal forces during shaking. Nevertheless, experimental evidences of permanent changes in internal loads in the tunnel lining would suggest that a full dynamic analysis including plastic soil behaviour should be performed when modelling the dynamic interaction between the tunnel and the ground. While sophisticated numerical methods can be used to predict seismic internal forces on tunnel structures during earthquakes, the accuracy of their predictions should be validated against field measurements, but the latter are seldom available. A series of centrifuge tests were therefore carried out at the University of Cambridge (UK) on tunnel models in sand, in the framework of a research project funded by the Italian Civil Protection Department. A numerical Round Robin on Tunnel Tests was later promoted among some research groups to predict the observed behaviour by means of numerical modelling. In this paper, the main results of five selected numerical predictions are summarized and compared with the experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ABAQUS/Standard (2005) User’s Manual (6.4). Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc. USA

  2. Abate G, Massimino MR, Maugeri M (2014) Numerical simulation of centrifuge tests on tunnel by a visco-elasto-plastic constitutive model. In: Proceedings of a workshop at 2nd international conference on performance based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering, Taormina (Italy), 28–30 May 2012, Patron Editore (in press)

  3. Adalier K, Abdoun T, Dobry R, Phillips R, Yang D, Naesgaard E (2003) Centrifuge modeling for seismic retrofit design of an immersed tube tunnel. Int J Phys Model Geotech 3(2):23–32

    Google Scholar 

  4. AFPS/AFTES (2001) Earthquake design and protection of underground structures

  5. AGI (2005) Guidelines for geotechnical design in seismic zones, Special volume of Italian Geotechnical Association. Hevelius ed. (in Italian)

  6. Amorosi A, Boldini D, Falcone G (2014) Numerical prediction of tunnel performance during centrifuge dynamic tests. Acta Geotech. doi:10.1007/s11440-013-0295-7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anastasopoulos I, Gelagoti F, Kourkoulis R, Gazetas G (2011) Simplified constitutive model for simulation of cyclic response of shallow foundations: validation against laboratory tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(12):1154–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Andrianopoulos KI, Papadimitriou AG, Bouckovalas GD (2010) Bounding surface plasticity model for the seismic liquefaction analysis of geostructures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(10):895–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bäckblom G, Munier R (2002) Effects of earthquakes on the deep repository for spent fuel in Sweden based on case studies and preliminary model results. Technical Report TR-02-24, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co

  10. Bilotta E, Lanzano G, Russo G, Silvestri F, Madabhushi SPG (2009) Seismic analyses of shallow tunnels by dynamic centrifuge tests and finite elements. In: Proceedings of 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Alexandria, Egypt. Balkema

  11. Bilotta E, Silvestri F (2012) A predictive exercise on the behaviour of tunnels under seismic actions. In: Proceedings of IS-Roma 2011 7th international symposium geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground. CRC Press, pp 1071–1077

  12. Bilotta E, Silvestri F (2012) A round robin test on tunnels under seismic actions. In: Proceedings of a workshop at 2nd international conference on performance based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering, Taormina (Italy), 28–30 May 2012, Patron Editore (in press)

  13. Bilotta E, Silvestri F (2013) A round robin test on tunnels under seismic actions. Geotech News 31(1):40

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brennan AJ, Madabhushi SPG (2002) Design and Performance of a new deep model container for dynamic centrifuge testing. In: Proceedings of international conference on physical modeling in geotechnics, St John’s, Newfoundland, Canada, July, pp 183–188

  15. Brennan AJ, Madabhushi SPG, Houghton NE. (2006) Comparing Laminar and Equivalent Shear Beam (ESB) Containers for Dynamic Centrifuge Modeling. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on physical modelling in geotechnics, ICPMG’06, Hong Kong. Taylor & Francis, pp 171–176

  16. Brennan AJ, Thusyanthan NI, Madabhushi SPG (2005) Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 131(12):1488–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chian SC, Stringer ME, Madabhushi SPG (2010) Use of the automatic sand pourers for loose sand models. In: Proceedings of VII international conference on physical model in geotechnics (ICPMG 2010), Zurich. Taylor & Francis, pp 117–121

  18. Cilingir U (2009) Seismic response of tunnels. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge

  19. Cilingir U, Madabhushi SPG (2011) Effect of depth on the seismic response of circular tunnels. Can Geotech J 48(1):117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cilingir U, Madabhushi SPG (2011) A model study on the effects of input motion on the seismic behaviour of tunnels. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:452–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cilingir U, Madabhushi SPG (2011) Effect of depth on the seismic response of square tunnels. Soils Found 51(3):449–457

  22. Conti R, Viggiani GMB, Perugini F (2014) Numerical modelling of centrifuge dynamic tests of circular tunnels in dry sand. Acta Geotech. doi:10.1007/s11440-013-0286-8

    Google Scholar 

  23. d’Onofrio A, Silvestri F, Vinale F (1999) A new torsional shear device. Geotech Test J 22(2):107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gomes RC (2014) Numerical simulation of RRTT with anelastoplastic multi-mechanism model. In: Proceedings of a workshop at 2nd international conference on performance based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering, Taormina (Italy), 28–30 May 2012, Patron Editore (in press)

  25. Gomes RC (2014) Numerical simulation of the seismic response of tunnels in sand with an elastoplastic model. Acta Geotech. doi:10.1007/s11440-013-0287-7

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hashash YMA, Hook JJ, Schmidt B, Yao JI-C (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16:247–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hleibieh J, Wegener D, Herle I (2014) Numerical simulation of RRTT with hypoplastic model. In: Proceedings of a workshop at 2nd international conference on performance based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering, Taormina (Italy), 28–30 May 2012, Patron Editore (in press)

  28. Hleibieh J, Wegener D, Herle I (2014) Numerical simulation of a tunnel surrounded by sand using a hypoplastic model. Acta Geotech. doi:10.1007/s11440-013-0294-8

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hujeux J-C (1985) Une loi de comportmente pour le chargement cyclique des sols. Génie Parasismique, V. Davidovici, Presses ENPC, France, pp 278–302

  30. ISO TC 98/SC 3 N229 (2003) Bases for design of structures: seismic actions for designing geotechnical works

  31. Itasca (2005) FLAC fast Lagrangian analysis of continua v. 5.0. User’s Manual

  32. Kontoe S, Zdravkovic L, Potts DM, Menkiti CO (2008) Case study on seismic tunnel response. Can Geotech J 45:1743–1764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lanzano G (2009) Physical and analytical model of tunnels under dynamic loadings. PhD Thesis. University of Naples Federico II

  34. Lanzano G, Bilotta E, Russo G, Silvestri F, Madabhushi, SPG (2009) Experimental assessment of performance-based methods for the seismic design of circular tunnels. In: Proceedings of 1st international conference on performance based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering. Tokyo (Japan)

  35. Lanzano G, Bilotta E, Russo G, Silvestri F, Madabhushi SPG (2010) Dynamic centrifuge tests on shallow tunnel models in dry sand. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on physical modelling in geotechnics, vol 1, pp 561–567

  36. Lanzano G, Bilotta E, Russo G, Silvestri F, Madabhushi SPG (2012) Centrifuge modeling of seismic loading on tunnels in sand. Geotech Test J 35(6):854–869. doi:10.1520/GTJ104348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lanzano G, Bilotta E, Russo G, Silvestri F (2014) Experimental and numerical study on circular tunnels under seismic loading. Eur J Environ Civil Eng. doi:10.1080/19648189.2014.893211

    Google Scholar 

  38. Madabhushi SPG (2014) Centrifuge modelling for civil engineers. Spon Press, London, ISBN-10: 0415668247

  39. NCHRP (2008) Seismic analysis and design of retaining wall, buried structures, slopes and embankments. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  40. O’Rourke TD, Goh SH, Menkiti CO, Mair RJ (2001) Highway tunnel performance during the 1999 Duzce Earthquake. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnics engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 1365–1368

  41. Owen GN, Scholl RE (1981). Earthquake engineering of large underground structures. Report no. FHWA/RD-80/195 Federal Highway Administration and National Science Foundation

  42. Papa V, Silvestri F, Vinale F (1989) Cyclic/dynamic simple shear tests: recent developments. Proc XII ICSMFE Rio de Janeiro 1:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  43. Penzien J, Wu CL (1998) Stresses in linings of bored tunnels. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 27:283–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pitilakis K, Tsinidis G (2014) Performance and seismic design of underground structures, state-of-art, earthquake geotechnical engineering design. Geotech Geol Earthq Eng 28:279–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Plaxis 2D (2009) Reference Manual. version 9.0

  46. Popescu R, Prevost JH (1995) Comparison between VELACS Numerical “Class A” predictions and centrifuge experimental soil test results. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 14(2):79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Popescu R, Prevost JH (1995) Reliability assessment of centrifuge soil test results. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 14(2):93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Santucci De Magistris F, Silvestri F, Vinale F (1998) The influence of compaction on the mechanical behaviour of a silty sand. Soils Found 38(4):41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Schofield AN (1980) Cambridge geotechnical centrifuge operations. Géotechnique 30–33:227–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Taylor et al. (1995) Geotechnical centrifuge technology. Blackie Academic and Professional

  51. Tsinidis G, Pitilakis K, Anastasiadis A (2014) Numerical simulation of RRTT with a combined linear-equivalent elasto-plastic approach. In: Proceedings of a workshop at 2nd international conference on performance based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering, Taormina (Italy), 28–30 May 2012, Patron Editore (in press)

  52. Tsinidis G, Pitilakis K, Trikalioti D (2014) Numerical simulation of round robin numerical test on tunnels using a simplified kinematic hardening model. Acta Geotech. doi:10.1007/s11440-013-0293-9

    Google Scholar 

  53. Visone C, Santucci de Magistris F (2009) Mechanical behaviour of the Leighton Buzzard Sand 100/170 under monotonic, cyclic and dynamic loading conditions. In: Proceedings of XIII conference onL’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia ANIDIS Bologna Italy

  54. von Wolffersdorff PA (1996) A hypoplastic relation for granular materials with a predefined limit state surface. Mech Cohes Frict Mater 1(3):251–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang J-N (1993) Seismic design of tunnels. Parson Brinckerhoff Inc, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wang WL, Wang TT, Su JJ, Lin CH, Seng CR, Huang TH (2001) Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16:133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yoshida N (2009) Damage to subway station during the 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu (Kobe) earthquake. Earthquake geotechnical case histories for performance-based design, Kokusho Ed. pp 373–389

  58. Zeghal M, Elgamal A-W (1994) Analysis of site liquefaction using earthquake records. J Geotech Geoenv Eng ASCE 120:71–85

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy

    Emilio Bilotta & Francesco Silvestri

  2. University of Molise, Termoli (CB), Italy

    Giovanni Lanzano

  3. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    S. P. Gopal Madabhushi

Authors
  1. Emilio Bilotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giovanni Lanzano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. P. Gopal Madabhushi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francesco Silvestri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilio Bilotta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bilotta, E., Lanzano, G., Madabhushi, S.P.G. et al. A numerical Round Robin on tunnels under seismic actions. Acta Geotech. 9, 563–579 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0330-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0330-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation