Abstract
This study examines the time-dependent poromechanics behavior of a fluid-saturated spherical inclusion embedded inside a fluid-saturated porous medium with different poroelastic properties. Both media comprise compressible constituents with distinctively defined poroelastic parameters. It is assumed that the inclusion is subjected to a fluid source at the center. The problem is formulated and solved using Biot theory of poromechanics. The contrasts in inclusion and the medium matrix stiffnesses and their respective hydraulic conductivities can be recognized as two competing factors, which affect the inclusion’s rate of expansion during fluid injection. Findings show a certain type of behavior that the inclusion exhibits at the onset of fluid injection when having greater stiffness than the medium matrix, where the inclusion experiences some decrease in the pore pressure. Compared to what announced as the stress redistribution due the Mandel–Cryer effect in earlier researches on dilation of free spheres, this study shows that the associated phenomenon would be likewise attributed to the coupled nature of pressures and deformations in the theory of poroelasticity. However, it is a consequence of the inclusion-matrix stiffness contrast where a dilating free sphere can be regarded as a special case of this new problem. The asymptotic expansions of pressure terms verify the existence of such an effect. The results of this study would put forward very good insight in some engineering applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A i :
-
Arbitrary constant of subdomain i
- B i :
-
Arbitrary constant of subdomain i
- B :
-
Skempton’s coefficient
- G :
-
Shear modulus
- P :
-
Pore fluid pressure
- Q :
-
Fluid source
- R :
-
The inclusion radius
- V :
-
Volume
- c :
-
Hydraulic diffusivity
- f1(s):
-
Arbitrary function
- g :
-
Shear modulus ratio
- k :
-
Permeability
- q :
-
Fluid point source strength
- r :
-
Radial distance
- t :
-
Time
- u :
-
Displacement vector
- β :
-
Similarity variable
- δ(x) :
-
Dirac delta function
- γ :
-
Loading efficiency
- ε :
-
Volumetric strain (dilatation)
- ζ :
-
Increment of fluid content
- η ε :
-
Expansion coefficient
- λ :
-
Hydraulic conductivity ratio
- μ :
-
Viscosity
- ν :
-
Drained Poisson ratio
- ν u :
-
Undrained Poisson ratio
- ρ :
-
Infinitesimal radius of the sphere enclosing the inclusion center
- σ :
-
Stress
- ξ :
-
The diffusivity ratio
- 1:
-
Indication of the inclusion property
- 2:
-
Indication of the matrix property
References
Abousleiman YN, Kanj MY (2004) The generalized Lamé problem—part II: applications in poromechanics. J Appl Mech 71:180–189. doi:10.1115/1.1683800
Abousleiman YN, Cheng AHD, Cui L (1996) Mandel’s problem revisited. Geotechnique 46:187–195
Cheng AHD, Detournay E (1998) On singular integral equations and fundamental solutions of poroelasticity. Int J Solids Struct 35(34):4521–4555. doi:10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00082-1
Cryer CW (1963) A comparison of the three-dimensional consolidation theories of Biot and Terzaghi. Q J Mech Appl Math 16:401–412. doi:10.1093/qjmam/16.4.401
Kodashima T, Kurashige M (1996) Thermal stresses in a fluid saturated poroelastic hollow sphere. J Therm Stresses 19:139–151. doi:10.1080/01495739608946166
Li X (1999) Stress and displacement fields around a deep circular Tunnel With Partial sealing. Comput Geotech 24:125–140. doi:10.1016/S0266-352X(98)00035-4
Li X, Flores-Berrons R (2002) Time dependant behavior of partially sealed circular tunnels. Comput Geotech 29:433–449. doi:10.1016/S0266-352X(02)00005-8
Mandel J (1953) Consolidation de sols (Etude Mathematique). Geotechnique 3:287–299
Mason DP, Solomon A, Nicolaysen LO (1991) Evolution of stress and strain during the consolidation of a fluid saturated porous elastic sphere. J Appl Phys 70(9):4724–4740. doi:10.1063/1.349065
Mason DP, Solomon A, Nicolaysen LO (2002) Evolution of displacement and pore fluid pressure due to a point fluid source at the center of a porous elastic sphere. S Afr J Sci 98:473–480
Nicolaysen LO (1985) Renewed ferment in earth sciences- especially about power supplies for the core, for the mantel and for crises in the faunal record. S Afr J Sci 81:120–132
Pedrosa OA, Petbras J (1986) Pressure transient in stress sensitive formations. 56th California Regional Meeting of The Society Of Petroleum Engineers, CA, 2–4 April
Rice JR, Cleary MP (1976) Some basic stress diffusion solutions for fluid-saturated elastic porous media with compressible constituents. Rev Geophys Space Phys 14(2):227–241. doi:10.1029/RG014i002p00227
Rice JR, Rudnicki DA, Simons DA (1978) Deformations of spherical cavities and inclusions in fluid-infiltrated elastic materials. Int J Solids Struct 14:289–303. doi:10.1016/0020-7683(78)90039-2
Selvadurai APS, Shirazi A (2004) The fluid-filled spherical cavity in a damage-susceptible poroelastic medium. Int J Damage Mech 13:347–370. doi:10.1177/1056789504044283
Senjuntichai T, Rajapakse RKND (1993) Transient response of a circular cavity in a poroelastic medium. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 17:357–383. doi:10.1002/nag.1610170602
Skempton AW (1954) The pore-pressure coefficients A and B. Geotechnique 4:143–147
Solomon A, Mason DP (1993) Numerical solution for the dilatation of a fluid saturated porous elastic sphere due to a point source of fluid at the center of the sphere. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 17:699–714. doi:10.1002/nag.1610171003
Stehfest H (1970) Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. Commun ACM 13(1):47–49. doi:10.1145/361953.361969
Wang HF (2000) Theory of linear poroelasticity with applications to geomechanics and hydrology. Princeton University Press, USA, pp 89–91
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Arbitrary functions of solution
The arbitrary functions which are found from the solution of Eqs. 21–24 are given below:
where the constants ψ, θ, ω and χ are defined as:
Appendix 2: Special case solution for fluid injection at the center of a poroelastic inclusion inside an elastic matrix
Here, we consider the case involving no pore fluid in the matrix but within the inclusion. The ordinary boundary value equation for fluid content increment in Laplace domain can be written as follows:
Equation 54 accounts for the no-flow boundary condition at the inclusion surface. The solution is presented as below:
Thereafter, the radial displacement and stress components can be obtained in a method similar to what presented in Sect. 2. The results are given below:
The radial displacement and stress components in the matrix can be simply found from the classical theory of elasticity. They are written as:
The arbitrary functions A 1(s) and A 2(s) are found from the following boundary conditions:
That gives:
Substitution of Eqs. 58 and 59 into Eq. 52 yields Eq. 28.
The expansion parameter defined in Sect. 3.2 can be found as:
The plot of Eq. 60 is given in Fig. 10. It shows that if the inclusion consists of incompressible constituents (ν u1 = 0.5), the expansion would be the same as the loading efficiency parameter, where all curves meet at g = 1. The graph corresponding to ν u1 = 0.33 has been generated before in Fig. 4 by the solid curve corresponding to an impermeable boundary (λ → 0).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehrabian, A., Abousleiman, Y.N. The dilative intake of poroelastic inclusions an alternative to the Mandel–Cryer effect. Acta Geotech. 4, 249–259 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-009-0098-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-009-0098-z