Abstract
Governments worldwide rightly regard universities as fundamental to the achievement of many national priorities. But it is the paper’s contention that many misunderstand their true benefit to society. Investments in universities are increasingly based on the belief that the science labs in particular of research-intensive universities can be the source of a continuous stream of people and ideas that will spawn innovative and fast growing companies to form the nexus of the knowledge-based economy. This belief is a source of misconceived policies that offer only ultimate disillusion. It is the totality of the university enterprise that is important, as the only place where that totality of ourselves and our world is brought together, and which makes it the strongest provider of the rational explanation and meaning that societies need. In research, universities create new possibilities; in teaching, they shape new people. Its graduates learn to seek the true meaning of things: to distinguish between the true and the merely seemingly true, to verify for themselves what is stable in that very unstable compound that often passes for knowledge. It is the complex, interacting whole of the university that is the source of the separate economic, social, cultural and utilitarian benefits valued by society. It needs to be understood, valued and managed as a whole. These perceptions are a direct challenge to not only to governments but to university administrators who have been either cowed or seduced into the slipshod thinking that is leading to demands that universities cannot satisfy, whilst obscuring their most important contributions. The challenge to both is to permit autonomy without oppressive accountability, and to give staff and students the freedom to think, speculate and research. These are the very conditions of the personal and collective creativity that are the sources of a university’s deepest benefits to its society.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Newman J H. The Idea of the University. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1852
Humboldt W von. Über die innere und äussere Organisation der höheren wissenschaftlichen Anstalten in Berlin. In: Leitzmann A, ed. Wilhelm von Humboldts Gesammelte Schrifte. Gesammelte Schriften zur Literatur, Band X. Berlin, 1903. 35
European Commission. Delivering on the Modernisation Agenda for Universities: Education, Research and Innovation. COM 208, 2006
European Commission. Facing the Challenge: The Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Employment. Report from the High Level Group Chaired by Wim Kok, 2004
European Commission. The European Research Area: New Perspectives. COM 161, 2007
European Commission. Globalisation of R&D: Linking Better the European Economy to Foreign Sources of Knowledge and Making EU a More Attractive Place for R&D Investment. Report from the Expert Group on Knowledge for Growth, D.Foray (rapporteur), 2007
Batterham R. The Chance to Change. Canberra: Australian Department of Industry, Science and Resources, 2000
Faust D. The Boston Globe. Boston, Massachusetts, October 12, 2007
Fukuyama F. The End of History and the Last Man. London: Penguin, 1992
May R M. The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 1997, 793–796
Richard B. International Competitiveness Competitiveness & the Role of Universities. London. Council for Industry and High Education, 2007
Boulton G S. Universities and Innovation: The Challenge for Europe. Leuven: League of European Research Universities, 2006
David P A, Metcalfe S. Universities and Public Research Organisations in the European Research Area. Report from the Expert Group on Knowledge for Growth, 2007
Boulton G S. The Future of the European Research Area. Leuven: League of European Resgearch Universities, 2007
Richard B. International Competitiveness Competitiveness & the Role of Universities. London: Council for Industry and High Education, 2007
Cairncross F. Death of Distance. New York: Texere, 2001
European Commission. Creating an Innovative Europe. Report of the Independent Expert Group Chaired by Esko Aho. 2006
European Commission. Delivering on the Modernization Agenda for Universities: Education, Research and Innovation. Brussels. COM 208, 2006
Lambert R, Butler N. The Future of European Universities: Renaissance or Decay? London: Centre for European Reform, 2006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Boulton, G., Lucas, C. What are universities for?. Chin. Sci. Bull. 56, 2506–2517 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4608-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4608-7