Skip to main content
Log in

Formations of groundwater hydrogeochemistry in a karst system during storm events as revealed by PCA

  • Articles
  • Geography
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

High-frequency samples have been collected at Jiangjia Spring, the outlet of Qingmuguan underground river system (QURS) in Chongqing in late April, 2008. The variations of hydrogeochemical compositions are found responding rapidly to storm events. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the 20 variables is employed to interpret the relationships with specific processes that control the groundwater hydrogeochemical formations. Through PCA, 84.961% of the total amount information is extracted to indicate the formations of groundwater hydrogeochemical features in QURS during storm events. The first component separates the soil erosion (i.e., increases in turbidity and concentrations of Al3+, TFe, TMn, Ba2+ and NO2 ), and dilution effect (i.e., decreases in specific conductance and concentrations of HCO3 , Ca2+ and Sr2+), accounting for 41.495% of the variability in the data. The second component indicates residual fertilizers and duck’s waste from farmlands (i.e., increases in specific conductance and concentrations of Na+, NO3 , PO4 3−, K+ and Cl), contributing to 37.449%. The dissolution of dolomite and dolomitic limestone makes up 6.017%. During the first rainfall event, the groundwater quality is mainly affected by residual fertilizers and duck’s waste from farmlands, whereas in the second rainfall event, it is mainly affected by increased turbidity and ionic concentrations caused by soil erosion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ford D C, Williams P W. Karst Geomorphology and Hydrology. Chichester: Wiley, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. Williams P. Environmental change and human impact on karst terrains: An introduction. Catena, 1993, 25: 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  3. Massei N, Lacroix M, Wang H Q, et al. Transport of suspended solids from a karstic to an alluvial aquifer: The role of the karst/alluvium interface. J Hydrol, 2002, 260: 88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Prohic E. Pollution assessment in carbonate terranes-A review. In: LaMoreaux P E, ed. Hydrology of Limstone Terranes, Annotated Bibliography of Carbonate Rocks. IAH, 1989. 61–82

  5. Jiang Y J, Zhang C, Yuan D X, et al. Impact of land use change on groundwater quality in a typical karst watershed of southwest China: A case study of the Xiaojiang watershed, Yunnan Province. Hydrogeol J, 2008, 16: 727–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jia Y N, Diao C T, Yuan D X. The influence of land use on karst water quality of buried karst region—A case of conglin karst ridge-trough at Fuling Town (in Chinese). J Nat Res, 2004, 19: 455–461

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li X M. The Karst groundwater environments in southwestern China are in emergency (in Chinese). Science Times. Beijing: Science Time Press, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yuan D X, Xue Y Q, Fu J M, et al. Countermeasures and suggestions to prevent karst underground rivers in Southwest China becoming “sewers” (in Chinese). Acad Sugges Chin Acad Sci, 2007, 4: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wunderlin D, Diaz M, Ame M, et al. Pattern recognition techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality. A case study: Suquia river basin (Cordoba, Argentina). Water Res, 2001, 35: 2881–2894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simeonov V, Stratis J, Samara C, et al. Assessment of the surface water quality in northern Greece. Water Res, 2003, 37: 4119–4124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carroll S, Goonetilleke A. Assessment of high density of onsite wastewater treatment systems on a shallow groundwater coastal aquifer using PCA. Environmetrics, 2005, 16: 257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koonce J E, Yu Z, Farnham I M, et al. Geochemical interpretation of groundwater flow in the southern Great Basin. Geosphere, 2006, 2: 88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lamouroux C, Hani A. Identification of groundwater flow paths in complex aquifer systems. Hydrol Process, 2006, 20: 2971–2987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Omo-Irabor O O, Olobaniyi S B, Oduyemli K, et al. Surface and groundwater water quality assessment using multivariate analytical methods: A case study of the Western Niger Delta, Nigeria. Phys Chem Earth, 2008, 33: 666–673

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rao N S, Rao J P, Subrahmanyam A. Principal component analysis in groundwater quality in a developing urban area of Andhra Pradesh. J Geol Soc India, 2007, 69: 959–969

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yang P H, Luo J Y, Peng W, et al. Application of online technique in tracer test: A case in Qingmuguan subterranean river system, Chong-qing, China (in Chinese). Carsol Sin, 2008, 27: 215–220

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ryan M, Meiman J. An examination of short-term variations in water quality at a karst spring in Kentucky. Ground Water, 1996, 34: 23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. GB/T 8538-1995, Method for Examination of Drinking Natural Mineral Water (in Chinese). 1995

  19. Zhang W L. Applicational operation of PCA in SPSS (in Chinese). Marketing Res, 2005, 12: 31–34

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao D, Seip H, Zhang D. Pattern and cause of acidic deposition in the Chongqing region, Sichuan Province, China. Water Air Soil Pollut, 1994, 77: 27–48

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xue H B, Schnoor J L. Acid deposition and lake chemistry in southwest China. Water Air Soil Pollut, 1994, 75: 61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahler B J, Valdes D, Musgrove M, et al. Nutrient dynamics as indicators of karst processes: Comparison of the Chalk aquifer (Normandy, France) and the Edwards aquifer (Texas, USA). J Contam Hydrol, 2008, 98: 36–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vesper D J, White W B. Metal transport to karst springs during storm flow: an example from Fort Campbell, Kentucky/Tennessee, USA. J Hydrol, 2003, 276: 20–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ashton K. The analysis of flow data from karst drainage systems. T Cave Res Group Great Brit, 1966, 7: 161–203

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hess J, White W. Storm response of the karstic carbonate aquifer of southcentral Kentucky. J Hydrol, 1988, 99: 235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Z H, Dreybrodt W, Wang H J. A possible important CO2 sink by the global water cycle. Chinese Sci Bull, 2008, 53: 402–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu Z H, Wang J L, Wu K Y, et al. Interpretion of borehole storm-scale and vertical hydrochemical variations at ehe Guilin Karst Experimental Site (in Chinese). Carsol Sin, 2004, 23: 169–176

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bouwer H. Integrated water management: Emerging issues and challenges. Agr Water Manage, 2000, 45: 217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bai X J. Ecological model for intergrowth of rice-duck (I) (in Chinese). Farmers Training, 2005, 8: 14–15

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bronson K F, Malapati A, Booker J D, et al. Residual soil nitrate in irrigated Southern High Plains cotton fields and Ogallala groundwater nitrate. J Soil Water Conserv, 2009, 64: 98–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yadav S. Formulation and estimation of nitrate-nitrogen leaching from corn cultivation. J Environ Qual, 1997, 26: 808–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Z J, Yang P H, Kuang Y L, et al. Temporal and spatial variations of the nitrate-nitrogen sources in an underground river using 15N isotope technique (in Chinese). Environ Sci, 2009, 30: 3548–3554

    Google Scholar 

  33. Valdes D, Dupont J P, Laignel B, et al. A spatial analysis of structural controls on Karst groundwater geochemistry at a regional scale. J Hydrol, 2007, 340: 244–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Calo F, Parise M. Waste management and problems of groundwater pollution in karst environments in the context of a post-conflict scenario: The case of Mostar (Bosnia Herzegovina). Habitat Int, 2009, 33: 63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Currens J C. Changes in groundwater quality in a conduit-flow-dominated karst aquifer, following BMP implemen-tation. Environ Geol, 2002, 42: 525–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Markovic T, Miko S, Kapelj S, et al. Behaviour of metals and nutrients in soils and groundwater of a karst polje. J Geochem Explor, 2006, 88: 124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou W F, Beck B F, Wang J, et al. Groundwater monitoring for cement kiln dust disposal units in karst aquifers. Environ Geol, 2007, 52: 761–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu F, Luo H B, Liu H Y, et al. The effect of land use pattern on the quality of shallow groundwater in karst hilly areas (in Chinese). Acta Mineral Sin, 2007, 27: 540–544

    Google Scholar 

  39. Elmi A, Madramootoo C, Egeh M, et al. Water and fertilizer nitrogen management to minimize nitrate pollution from a cropped soil in southwestern Quebec, Canada. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2004, 151: 117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Voutsa D, Manoli E, Samara C, et al. A study of surface water quality in Macedonia, Greece: Speciation of nitrogen and phosphorus. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2001, 129: 13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to PingHeng Yang.

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, P., Yuan, D., Yuan, W. et al. Formations of groundwater hydrogeochemistry in a karst system during storm events as revealed by PCA. Chin. Sci. Bull. 55, 1412–1422 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-0083-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-0083-9

Keywords

Navigation