Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying soil erosion with GIS-based RUSLE under different forest management options in Jianchang Forest Farm

  • Published:
Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitatively estimating soil erosion with an integration of geographic information system (GIS) and the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) under four different exposed soil proportion scenarios caused by forest management practices was studied at Jianchang Forest Farm. The GIS provided means of input data generation required by RUSLE model and allowed a spatial assessment of the erosion hazard over the study area. Four exposed soil proportion scenarios of 5%, 10%, 20% and 30% were tested with the GIS-based RUSLE model to evaluate soil erosion hazard. The predicted soil erosion potentials were classified into five categories in order to provide valuable aids for management planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dissmeyer G E, Stednick J D. Drinking water from forests and grasslands: a synthesis of the scientific literature, general technical report SRS-39. North Carolina: USDA Forest Service, 2000. 109–139

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yan J Z, Zhang Y L, Bai W Q, et al. Land cover changes based on plant successions: deforestation, rehabilitation and degeneration of forest in the upper Dadu River watershed. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2005, 48(2): 2214–2230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen H, Zhou J X, Cai Q G, et al. The impact of vegetation restoration on erosion-induced sediment yield in the middle Yellow River and management prospect. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2005, 48(6): 724–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan P J, Murphy S, McKenzie N J. Assessing soil erosion hazard for Australian forest management. Victoria: Australia, Department of Agriculture Fisheries & Forestry, 2001. 14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning. Agricultural Handbook. Washington, DC: USDA Science and Education Administration, 1978. 537

    Google Scholar 

  6. Millward A A. Adapting the RUSLE to model soil erosion potential in a mountainous tropical watershed. Catena, 1999, 38: 109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jia T J. Soils of Liaoning (in Chinese). Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Publishing House, 1992. 117–213

    Google Scholar 

  8. Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A, et al. Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation. Handbook No. 703. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1997. 404

    Google Scholar 

  9. Desmet P J, Govers G. A GIS-procedure for the automated calculation of the USLE LS-factor on topographically complex landscape units. J Soil Water Conserv, 1996a, 51(5): 427–433

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen M H, Zhou F J, et al. Effects of slope gradient and slope length on soil erosion. J Soil Water Conserv (in Chinese), 1995, 9(1): 31–36

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dissmeyer G E, Foster G R. A guide for predicting sheet and rill erosion on forested land, technical publication SA-TP 11. West Lafayette: USDA Forest Service, 1980. 40

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dissmeyer G E, Foster G R. Estimating the cover management factor in the USLE for forest conditions. J Soil Water Conserv, 1981, 36(4): 235–240

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez R, L M. Educator/Professor with IMECBIO, Universidad de Guadalajara, Personal Correspondence, July 15 to August 15, 1997

  14. Huang Y, Jia T H, et al. Quantitative study of soil erosion on tussore ground in Liaoning Province. Liaoning Urban and Rural Environmental Science & Technology (in Chinese), 2000, 20(4): 14–16

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y L, Huang Y, et al. Quantitative study of soil erosion on slope-land in Liaoning Province. J Soil Water Conserv (in Chinese), 2002, 16(1): 13–15

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo Y Y, Duan Q F, et al. Standards for Classification and Gradation of Soil Erosion (in Chinese). Beijing: China Water Resources and Hydropower Press, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  17. Swank W T, DeBano LF, Nelson D. Effects of timber management practices on soil and water. In: Burns R L, ed. Tech. Comp, National Forest System. Gen, Tech, Rep, WO-55. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 1989. 180

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu M, Hu Y M, et al. Quantitative study of forest soil erosion based on GIS, RS and RUSLE—a case study of Huzhong region, Da Hinggan Mountains. Res Soil Water Conserv (in Chinese), 2004, 11(3): 21–24

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tang L N, Wang Q L, G F Shao, et al. Digitally determining forest inventory units with an ecological classification system. Sci China Ser E, 2006, 49(supp.I): 118–127

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dai Limin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Wang, Q., Dai, L. et al. Quantifying soil erosion with GIS-based RUSLE under different forest management options in Jianchang Forest Farm. SCI CHINA SER E 49 (Suppl 1), 160–166 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-006-8117-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-006-8117-z

Keywords

Navigation