Abstract
There has been an intensive international effort to develop high-order Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods into design tools in aerospace engineering during the last one and half decades. These methods offer the potential to significantly improve solution accuracy and efficiency for vortex dominated turbulent flows. Enough progresses have been made in algorithm development, mesh generation and parallel computing that these methods are on the verge of being applied in a production design environment. Since many review papers have been written on the subject, I decide to offer a personal perspective on the state-of-the-art in high-order CFD methods and the challenges that must be overcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. C. Vassberg, E. N. Tinoco, M. Mani, O. Brodersen, B. Eisfeld, R. Wahls, J. Morrison, T. Zickuhr, K. Laflin, and D. Marriplis, J. Aircraft 51, 1070 (2014).
M. R. Visbal, and D. V. Gaitonde, J. Comp. Phys. 181, 155 (2002).
Z. J. Wang, K. J. Fidkowski, R. Abgrall, F. Bassi, D. Caraeni, A. Cary, H. Deconinck, R. Hartmann, K. Hillewaert, H. T. Huynh, N. Kroll, G. May, P.- O. Persson, B. V. Leer, and M. Visbal, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 72, 811 (2013).
B. Cockburn, and C. W. Shu, Math. Comput. 52, 411 (1989).
B. Cockburn, and C. W. Shu, J. Comput. Phys. 141, 199 (1998).
F. Bassi, S. Rebay, J. Comput. Phys. 131, 267 (1997).
H. T. Huynh, “A flux reconstruction approach to high-order schemes including discontinuous Galerkin methods”, AIAA Paper No. 2007–4079, 2007.
H. T. Huynh, Z. J. Wang, and P. E. Vincent, Comput. Fluids 98, 209 (2014).
Z. J. Wang, and H. Gao, J. Comput. Phys. 228, 8161 (2009).
P. E. Vincent, P. Castonguay, and A. Jameson, J. Sci. Comput. 47, 50 (2011).
T. Haga, H. Gao, and Z. J. Wang, Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 6, 28 (2011).
N. Kroll, “ADIGMA-A European project on the development of adaptive higher-order variational methods for aerospace applications”, AIAA Paper No. 2009-176, 2009.
Z. J. Wang, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20130318 (2014).
J. S. Hesthaven, and T. Warburton, J. Comput. Phys. 181, 186 (2002).
Z. J. Wang, Adaptive high-order methods in computational fluid dynamics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2011).
J. A. Ekaterinaris, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 41, 192 (2005).
Z. J. Wang, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 43, 1 (2007).
X. Deng, M. Mao, G. Tu, H. X. Zhang, and Y. F. Zhang, High-order and high accurate CFD methods and their applications for complex grid problems, Comm. Comp. Phys. 11, 1081 (2012).
M. Dumbser, D. Balsara, E. F. Toro, and C. D. Munz, A unified framework for the construction of one-step finite-volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 227, 8209 (2008).
H. Luo, L. Luo, R. Nourgaliev, V. A. Mousseau, and N. Dinh, J. Comput. Phys. 229, 6961 (2010).
L. Zhang, W. Liu, L. He, X. G. Deng, H. X. Zhang, and L. P. Zhang, J. Comput. Phys. 231, 1081 (2012).
J. Du, C. W. Shu, and M. Zhang, Appl. Numer. Math. 90, 146 (2015).
J. S. Park, and C. Kim, Comput. Fluids 96, 377 (2014).
G. E. Barter, and D. L. Darmofal, “Shock capturing with higher-order, PDE-based artificial viscosity”, AIAA Paper No. 2007-3823, 2007.
H. Zhang, and F. Zhuang, Adv. Appl. Mech. 29, 193 (1991).
D. Fu, and Y. Ma, J. Comput. Phys. 134, 1 (1997).
X. Deng, and H. Maekawa, J. Comput. Phys. 130, 77 (1997).
X. Deng, and H. Zhang, J. Comput. Phys. 165, 22 (2000).
Y. X. Ren, M. Liu, and H. Zhang, J. Comput. Phys. 192, 365 (2003).
G. J. Gassner, F. Hindenlang, and F. Munz, A Runge-Kutta based discontinuous Galerkin method with time accurate local time stepping, in Adaptive High-order Methods in Computational Fluid Dynamics, edited by Z. J. Wang (World Scientific, Singapore, 2011), p. 95.
P. O. Persson, “High-order LES simulations using implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta schemes”, AIAA Paper No. 2011-684, 2011.
Y. Saad, and M. H. Schultz, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comp. 7, 856 (1986).
K. J. Fidkowski, T. A. Oliver, J. Lu, and D. L. Darmofal, J. Comput. Phys. 207, 92 (2005).
C. R. Nastase, and D. J. Mavriplis, J. Comput. Phys. 213, 330 (2006).
M. Ceze, and K. J. Fidkowski, “Pseudo-transient continuation, solution update methods, and CFL strategies for DG discretizations of the RANS-SA equations”, AIAA Paper No. 2013-2686, 2013.
C. Geuzaine, and J. F. Remacle, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 79, 1309 (2009).
CGNS System. The standard for numerical analysis data (http://www.cgns.org).
P. O. Persson, and J. Peraire, “Curved mesh generation and mesh refinement using lagrangian solid mechanics”, AIAA Paper No. 2009-949, 2009.
K. J. Fidkowski, and D. L. Darmofal, AIAA J. 49, 673 (2011).
N. A. Pierce, and M. B. Giles, SIAM Rev. 42, 247 (2000).
A. Belme, A. Dervieux, and F. Alauzet, J. Comput. Phys. 231, 6323 (2012).
D. L. Darmofal, S. R. Allmaras, M. Yano, and J. Kudo, “An adaptive, higher-order discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for aerodynamics”, AIAA Paper No. 2013-2871, 2013.
R. Hartmann, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 72, 883 (2013).
R. Hartmann, and P. Houston, J. Comput. Phys. 183, 508 (2002).
S. M. Kast, and K. J. Fidkowski, J. Comput. Phys. 252, 468 (2013).
D. A. Venditti, and D. L. Darmofal, J. Comput. Phys. 187, 22 (2003).
L. Wang, and D. J. Mavriplis, J. Comput. Phys. 228, 7643 (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z. A perspective on high-order methods in computational fluid dynamics. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 59, 614701 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-015-5706-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-015-5706-3