Abstract
An experimental study was conducted to investigate the effects of relative rotation direction on the wake interferences among two tandemwind turbines models. While the oncoming flow conditions were kept in constant during the experiments, turbine power outputs, wind loads acting on the turbines, and wake characteristics behind the turbines were compared quantitatively with turbine models in either co-rotating or counter-rotating configuration. The measurement results reveal that the turbines in counter-rotating would harvest more wind energy from the same oncoming wind, compared with the co-rotating case. While the recovery of the streamwise velocity deficits in the wake flows was found to be almost identical with the turbines operated in either co-rotating or counter-rotating, the significant azimuthal velocity generated in the wake flow behind the upstream turbine is believed to be the reason why the counter-rotating turbines would have a better power production performance. Since the azimuthal flow velocity in the wake flow was found to decrease monotonically with the increasing downstream distance, the benefits of the counter-rotating configuration were found to decrease gradually as the spacing between the tandem turbines increases. While the counter-rotating downstream turbine was found to produce up to 20% more power compared with that of co-rotating configuration with the turbine spacing being about 0.7D, the advantage was found to become almost negligible when the turbine spacing becomes greater than 6.5D. It suggests that the counter-rotating configuration design would be more beneficial to turbines in onshore wind farms due to the smaller turbine spacing (i.e., ∼3 rotor diameters for onshore wind farms vs. ∼7 rotor diameters for offshore wind farms in the prevailing wind direction), especially for those turbines sited over complex terrains with the turbine spacing only about 1–2 rotor diameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schreck S, Lundquist J, Shaw W. U.S. Department of Energy Workshop Report: Research Needs for Wind Resource Characterization. Technical Report, 2008, NREL/TP-500-43521
Barthelmie R J, Jensen L E. Evaluation of power losses due to wind turbine wakes at the Nysted offshore wind farm. Wind Energy, 2010, 13: 573–586
Vermeer L J, Sørensen J N, Crespo A. Wind turbine wake aerodynamics. Prog Aerospace Sci, 2003, 39: 467–510
Sørensen B. Renewable Energy: Its Physics, Engineering, Use, Environmental Impacts, Economy, and Planning Aspects. London: Elsevier, 2004
Hau E. Wind Turbines: Fundamentals, Technologies, Application, Economics. Berlin: Springer, 2005
Medici D, Alfredsson P. Measurement on a wind turbine wake: 3D effects and bluff body vortex shedding. Wind Energy, 2006, 9: 219–236
Hu H, Yang Z, Sarkar P. Dynamic wind loads and wake characteristics of a wind turbine model in an atmospheric boundary layer wind. Exp Fluids, 2012, 52(5): 1277–1294
Zhang W, Markfort C D, Porté-Agel F. Near-wake flow structure downwind of a wind turbine in a turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids, 2012, 52: 1219–1235
Porté-Agel F, Wu Y T, Lu H, et al. Large eddy simulation of atmospheric boundary layer flow through wind turbines and wind farms. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2011, 99: 154–168
Wu Y T, Porté-Agel F. Large-eddy simulation of wind-turbine wakes: Evaluation of turbine parameterizations. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2011, 138(3): 345–366
Ross J N, Ainslie J F. Wake measurements in clusters of model wind turbines using laser Doppler anemometry. In: Proceedings of the Third BWEA Wind Energy Conference, Cranfield, 1981. 172–184
Barthelmie R J, Folkerts L, Ormel F T, et al. Offshore wind turbine wakes measured by sodar. J Atmospheric Oceanic Tech, 2003, 20(4): 466–477
Hu H, Tian W, Ozbay A. Wind turbine aeromechanics and interferences among multiple turbines in onshore and offshore wind farms. In: 2013 NAWEA Symposium on Wind Energy, the University of Colorado, Boulder, USA, Aug. 06–08, 2013
Barthelmie R J, Larsen G C, Pryor S C, et al. Efficient development of offshore wind farms (ENDOW): Modeling wake and boundary layer interactions. Wind Energy, 2004, 7: 225–245
Manwell J F, McGowan J G, Rogers A L. Wind Energy Explained, Theory, Design and Application. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2002
Meyers J, Meneveau C. Optimal turbine spacing in fully developed wind farm boundary layers. Wind Energy, 2012, 15: 305–317
Calaf M, Meneveau C, Meyers J. Large eddy simulation study of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers. Phys Fluids, 2010, 22: 015110
Markfort C D, Zhang W, Porté-Agel F. Turbulent flow and scalar flux through and over aligned and staggered wind farms. J Turbulence, 2012, 13(1): 1–36
Wu Y T, Porté-Agel F. Simulation of turbulent flow inside and above wind farms: Model validation and layout effects. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2013, 146(2): 181–205
Chamorro L P, Arndt R E A, Sotiropoulos F. Turbulent flow properties around a staggered wind farm. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2011, 141(3): 349–367
Tian W, Ozbay A, Yang Z, et al. An experimental investigation on the wake interference of multiple wind turbines in atmospheric boundary layer winds. AIAA Paper, 2012, AIAA-2012-2784
Adaramola M S, Krogstad P A. Experimental investigation of wake effects on wind turbine performance. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36: 2078–2086
Ozbay A, Tian W, Yang Z, et al. Interference of wind turbines with different yaw angles of the upstream wind turbine. AIAA Paper, 2012, AIAA-2012-2719
Seungmin L, Hogeon K, Eunkuk S, et al. Effects of design parameters on aerodynamic performance of a counter-rotating wind turbine. Renewable Energy, 2012, 42: 140–144
Conzemius R J. Wind turbine and sodar observations of wakes in a large wind farm. In: 19th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, Keystone, CO, U.S., Aug., 2010
Appa K. Counter Rotating Wind Turbine System. Energy Innovations Small Grant (EISG) Program Technical Report, California, USA, 2002
Shen W Z, Zakkam V A K, Sørensen J N, et al. Analysis of counter-rotating wind turbines. J Phys-Conf Ser, 2007, 75: 012003
Jung S N, No T S, Ryu K W. Aerodynamic performance prediction of a 30 kW counter-rotating wind turbine system. Renewable Energy, 2005, 30: 631–644
Habash R W Y, Groza V, Yang Y, et al. Performance of a Contra rotating Small Wind Energy Converter. In: DELTA 2011, IEEE 6th International Workshop on Electronic Design, Test and Application, Queenstown, New Zealand, 17–19 Jan, 2011. 263–268. Doi: 10.1109/DELTA.2011.55
An Y, Han F, Kubota T, et al. Effect of unsteady wake from counter rotating wind rotor on downstream environment. Water Resources Power, 2010, 28(10): 158–160
Farahani E M, Hosseinzadeh N, Ektesabi M M. Comparison of dynamic responses of dual and single rotor wind turbines under transient conditions. In: Sustainable Energy Technologies (ICSET), 2010 IEEE International Conference, Kandy, Sri Lanka, Dec., 2010
Yuan W, Ozbay A, Tian W, et al. An experimental investigation on the effects of turbine rotation directions on the wake interference of wind turbines. AIAA Paper, 2013, AIAA-2013-0607
Burton T, Sharpe D, Jenkins N, et al. Wind Energy Handbook. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2001
Zhou Y, Kareem A. Definition of wind profiles in ASCE 7. J Struct Eng, 2002, 128: 1082–1086
Locke J, Valecia U, Ishikawa K. Design studies for twist-coupled wind turbine blades. In: ASME 2003 Wind Energy Symposium (WIND2003), Reno, Nevada, USA, January 6–9, 2003
Alfredsson P H, Dahlberg J A, Vermeulen P E J. A comparison between predicted and measured data from wind turbine wakes. Wind Energy, 1982, 6(3): 149–155
Medici D, Alfredsson P H. Measurements on a wind turbine wake: 3D effects and bluff body vortex shedding. Wing Energy, 2006, 9: 219–236
Kang H S, Meneveau C. Direct mechanical torque sensor for model wind turbines. Meas Sci Tech, 2010, 21(10): 105206
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Contributed by HU Hui (Associated Editor)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, W., Tian, W., Ozbay, A. et al. An experimental study on the effects of relative rotation direction on the wake interferences among tandem wind turbines. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 57, 935–949 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-014-5429-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-014-5429-x