Skip to main content
Log in

Fuel consumption for interplanetary missions of solar sailing

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The orbits of solar sails can be changed by adjusting the sail’s attitude through external control torques. The resulting momentum will be changed, either provided by a typical attitude control subsystem or by a propellantless device. This paper investigates the extra momentum input and fuel consumption for a typical attitude control subsystem. The minimum-time transfer trajectories are designed for two rendezvous missions using both indirect and direct methods, generating continuous and discrete attitude histories, respectively. The results show that the momentum variation is almost wholly due to the solar radiation pressure. The feasibility of using tip-mounted microthrusters for attitude control is evaluated. The results show that less than 0.1 kg of propellant are required for an interplanetary transfer mission when pulsed plasma thrusters with a specific impulse of 700 s and a thrust of 150 mN are mounted at the tip of a 20 m square solar sail. The fuel consumptions of two transfer missions indicate that a tip-mounted pulsed plasma thruster is a viable technique for the attitude control of a solar sail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

µ:

Gravitational constant of the Sun, Nm2/kg

β :

Lightness number of the solar sail, dimensionless

m :

Mass of the sailcraft, kg

t 0 :

Time of sail departing from the Earth, MJD (Modified Julian Day)

t f :

Time of sail arriving at the target body, MJD (Modified Julian Day)

F s :

Solar radiation pressure acceleration, m/s2

R :

Position vector of the sail with respect to the Sun, m

V :

Velocity vector of the sail with respect to the Sun, m/s

λ R , λ V :

Lagrange multipliers of the position and velocity vector, dimensionless

Ψ:

Constraints equations for the sail at initial time

Π:

Constraints equations for the sail at final time

γ 0, γ f :

Lagrange multipliers related to initial and final time constraints, dimensionless

n :

Unit vector along the sail normal, a unit vector

k :

Position and velocity vector of the Earth with respect to the Sun, m

g :

Velocity vector of the Earth with respect to the Sun, m/s

s :

Position and velocity vector of the target object with respect to the Sun, m

a :

Velocity vector of the target object with respect to the Sun, m/s

α :

Pitch angle of the sail normal with respect to sunlight, rad

ᾶ:

Angle measured from λ V to sunlight, rad

δ :

Clock angle of the sail normal with respect to sunlight, rad

θ :

Rotational angle along the sail normal, rad

ψ :

Sphere coordinates of the sail’s position as measured from the equinox, rad

ϕ :

Sphere coordinates of the sail’s position as measured from the ecliptic planes, rad

H :

Hamilton function of the system, dimensionless

e :

Unit vector perpendicular to the sunlight in the plane spanned by sunlight and λ V , a unit vector

A o2b :

Transition matrix from the orbital frame to the body-fixed frame, an orthogonal matrix

ω o2i :

Angular velocity of the orbital frame, rad/s

ω b2o :

Angular velocity of the body-fixed frame relative to the orbital frame, rad/s

ω b2i :

Angular velocity of the body-fixed frame, rad/s

H :

Angular momentum of the sail, kg m2/s

M c :

Control torque, Nm

M s :

Solar radiation pressure torque, Nm

J x , J y , J z :

Moment of inertia, kgm2

η :

Cm/cp offset, m

I M :

Integration of the control torque along the reference transfer trajectory, Nms

I p :

Extra momentum input due to the precession, Nms

I s :

Extra momentum input due to solar radiation pressure torque, Nms

I q :

Extra momentum input due to attitude maneuver, Nms

L :

Moment arm of the thruster relative to the mass center, m

I bit :

Impulse bit the microPPT, Ns

d arm :

Moment arm for the thruster, m

M m :

Maximum control torque of the thruster, Nm

Δm q :

Fuel consumption of attitude maneuver, kg

Δm s :

Fuel consumption for canceling the SRP torque, kg

q :

Unit vector along the rotation axis

κ :

A positive weight constant for minimum-time performance, dimensionless

c :

A positive weight constant for augmented Lagrange method, dimensionless

References

  1. Tsuda Y, Mori O, Funase R, et al. Flight status of IKAROS deep space solar sail demonstrator. Acta Astron, 2011, 69(9–10): 833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Prado J Y, Perret A, Pignolet G, et al. Using a solar sail for a plasma storm early warning system. Int Acad Astron, 1996, Paper 96-IAA. 3.3.06

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lazzara M A, Coletti A, Diedrich B L. The possibilities of polar meteorology, environmental remote sensing, communications and space weather applications from artificial Lagrange orbit. Adv Space Res, 2011, 48(11): 1880–1889

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Driver J. Analysis of an acrtic polesitter. J Spacecr Rockets, 1980, 17(3): 263–269

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heiligers J, Ceriotti M, McInnes C R, et al. Mission analysis and systems design of a near-term and far-term Pole-Sitter mission. In: 1st IAA Conference on Dynamics and Control of Space Systems, 2012-03-19-2012-03-21, Porto

  6. McInnes C R, Macdonald M, Angelopous V, et al. GEOSAIL: Exploring the geomagnetic tail using a small solar sail. J Spacecr Rockets, 2001, 38(4): 622–629

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Macdonald M, Hughes G W, McInnes C R, et al. GeoSail: An elegant solar sail demonstration mission. J Spacecr Rockets, 2007, 44(4): 784–796

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Macdonald M, McInnes C R. Solar sail science mission applications and advancement. Adv Space Res, 2011, 48(11): 1702–1716

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Macdonald M, McInnes C R, Hughes G W. Technology requirements of exploration beyond Neptune by solar sail propulsion. J Spacecr Rockets, 2010, 47(3): 472–483

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. West J L, Derbes B. Solar sail vehicle system design for the geostorm warning mission. AIAA Paper 2000-5326, Sept., 2000

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wie B. Solar sail attitude control and dynamics, part 1. J Guid Control Dyn, 2004, 27(4): 527–535

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lawrence D A, Piggott S W. Integrated trajectory and attitude control for a four-vane solar sail. In: 2005 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. San Francisco, CA, USA, 15–18 Aug., 2005. 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mimasu Y, Yamaguchi T, Matsumoto M. Spinning solar sail orbit steering via spin rate control. Adv Space Res, 2011, 48(11): 1810–1821

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wie B, Murphy D, Paluszek M, et al. Robust attitude control systems design for solar sails, Part 2: MicroPPT-based Secondary ACS. AIAA 2004-5011, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 16–19 August, 2004, Providence, Rhode Island

  15. Jiang F H, Li J F, Baoyin H X. Practical techniques for low-thrust trajectory optimization with homotopic approach. J Guid Control Dyn, 2012, 35(1): 245–258

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zuiani F, Vasile M, Palmas A, et al. Direct transcription of low-thrust trajectories with finite trajectory elements. Acta Astron, 2012, 72: 108–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Macdonald M, McInnes C R, Dachwald B. Heliocentric solar sail orbit transfers with locally optimal control laws. J Spacecr Rocket, 2007, 44(1): 273–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wie B. Hovering control of a solar sail gravity tractor spacecraft for asteroid deflection. In: the 2007 Planetary Defense Conference, Washington, D.C., March, 2007

  19. Gong S P, Li J F, BaoYin H X. Formation flying solar-sail gravity tractors in displaced orbit for towing near-Earth Asteroids. Celest Mech Dyn Astron, 2009, 105(1–3): 159–177

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Mengali G, Quarta A A. Solar sail near-optimal circular transfers with plane change. J Guid Control, 2009, 32(2): 456–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gong S P, Gao Y F, Li J F. Solar sail time-optimal interplanetary transfer trajectory design. Res Astron Astrophys, 2011, 11(8): 981–996

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dachwald B. Optimization of solar sail interplanetary trajectories using evolutionary neurocontrol. J Guid Control Dyn, 2004, 27(1): 66–72

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Spanjers G, Bromaghim D, Lake J, et al. AFRL microPPT development for small spacecraft propulsion. In: 28th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Indianapolis, IN, July 2002, AIAA-2002-3974

  24. Pottinger S J, Scharlemann C A. Micro pulsed plasma thruster development In: 30th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Florence, Italy, September 17–20, 2007

  25. Myers R M, Oleson S R, McGuire M, et al. Pulsed plasma thruster technology for small satellite missions. In: 9th AIAA/Utah State University Conference on Small Satellites, Sep. 18–21, 1995

  26. Benson S, Arrington L, Hoskins A, et al. Development of a PPT for the EO-1 spacecraft. In: 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Los Angeles, CA, June 20–24, 1999, AIAA-99-2276

  27. Cassady R, Hoskins A, Campbell M, et al. A micro pulsed plasma thruster (PPT) for the Dawgstar spacecraft. In: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, 2000

  28. Wie B, Murphy D. MicroPPT-based secondary/backup ACS for a 160-m, 450-kg solar sail spacecraft. In: 41st AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference, Tucson, AZ, July 10–13, 2005, AIAA-2005-3724

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ShengPing Gong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gong, S., Li, J. Fuel consumption for interplanetary missions of solar sailing. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 57, 521–531 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-013-5236-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-013-5236-9

Keywords

Navigation