Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of triple-phase contact line on contact angle hysteresis

  • Article
  • Special Issue: Physical Mechanics
  • Published:
Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that the triple-phase contact line has critical effect on the contact angle hysteresis of surfaces. In this study, patterned surfaces with various surface structures of different area fractions were prepared by electron etching on a silicon wafer. The advancing angle, receding angle and hysteresis angle of these surfaces were measured. Our experimental results showed that while the geometry of microstructure and contact line have a minor effect on the advancing angle, they have a significant effect on the receding angle and thus the hysteresis angle. We have shown that the effect of microstructure and the contact line can be described by a quantitative parameter termed the triple-phase line ratio. The theoretical predictions were in good agreement with our experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Su Y W, Ji B H, Huang Y G, et al. Concave biological surfaces for strong wet adhesion. Acta Mech Solid Sin, 2009, 22: 593–604

    Google Scholar 

  2. Su Y W, Ji B H, Huang Y G, et al. Nature’s design of hierarchical superhydrophobic surfaces of a water strider for low adhesion and low-energy dissipation. Langmuir, 2010, 26: 18926–18937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Su Y W, He S J, Ji B H, et al. More evidence of the crucial roles of surface superhydrophobicity in free and safe maneuver of water strider. Appl Phys Lett, 2011, 99: 263704

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson R E, Dettre R H. Contact angle hysteresis (I) Study of an idealized rough surface. Adv Chem Ser, 1964, 43: 112–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Morra M, Occhiello E, Garbassi F. Contact-angle hysteresis in oxygen plasma treated poly (Tetrafluoroethylene). Langmuir, 1989, 5: 872–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen W, Fadeev A Y, Hsieh M C, et al. Ultrahydrophobic and ultralyophobic surfaces: Some comments and examples. Langmuir, 1999, 15: 3395–3399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Youngblood J P, McCarthy T J. Ultrahydrophobic polymer surfaces prepared by simultaneous ablation of polypropylene and sputtering of poly (tetrafluoroethylene) using radio frequency plasma. Macromolecules, 1999, 32: 6800–6806

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Oner D, McCarthy T J. Ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Effects of topography length scales on wettability. Langmuir, 2000, 16: 7777–7782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Extrand C W. Model for contact angles and hysteresis on rough and ultraphobic surfaces. Langmuir, 2002, 18: 7991–7999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Patankar N A. On the modeling of hydrophobic contact angles on rough surfaces. Langmuir, 2003, 19: 1249–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tadmor R. Line energy and the relation between advancing, receding, and young contact angles. Langmuir, 2004, 20: 7659–7664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martines E, Seunarine K, Morgan H, et al. Superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity of regular nanopatterns. Nano Lett, 2005, 5: 2097–2103

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dorrer C, Ruehe J. Advancing and receding motion of droplets on ultrahydrophobic post surfaces. Langmuir, 2006, 22: 7652–7657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu Y, Zhao Z H, Zheng Q S. Mechanical and superhydrophobic stabilities of two-scale surfacial structure of lotus leaves. Langmuir, 2007, 23: 8212–8216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ng T W, Yu Y, Tan H Y, et al. Capillary well microplate. Appl Phys Lett, 2008, 93: 174105

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yeh K Y, Chen L J, Chang J Y. Contact angle hysteresis on regular pillar-like hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir, 2008, 24: 245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi W, Tuteja A, Mabry J M, et al. A modified Cassie-Baxter relationship to explain contact angle hysteresis and anisotropy on non-wetting textured surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2009, 339: 208–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng Q S, Yu Y, Feng X Q. The role of adaptive-deformation of water strider leg in its walking on water. J Adhes Sci Technol, 2009, 23: 493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Su Y W, Ji B H, Zhang K, et al. Nano to micro structural hierarchy is crucial for stable superhydrophobic and water-repellent surfaces. Langmuir, 2010, 26: 4984–4989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Young T. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans R Soc London, 1805, 95: 65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wenzel R N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Indu Eng Chem, 1936, 28: 988–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cassie A B D, Baxter S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc, 1944, 40: 546–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang B B, Zhao Y P, Yu T. Fabrication of novel superhydrophobic surfaces and droplet bouncing behavior—Part 2: Water droplet impact experiment on superhydrophobic surfaces constructed using ZnO nanoparticles. J Adhes Sci Technol, 2011, 25: 93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao L, McCarthy T J. “Artificial lotus leaf” prepared using a 1945 patent and a commercial textile. Langmuir, 2006, 22: 5998–6000

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yang Yu or BaoHua Ji.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, Y., Wu, Q., Zhang, K. et al. Effect of triple-phase contact line on contact angle hysteresis. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 55, 1045–1050 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-012-4736-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-012-4736-3

Keywords

Navigation