Skip to main content
Log in

Limitations of absolute current densities derived from the Semel & Skumanich method

  • Published:
Science in China Series G: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Semel and Skumanich proposed a method to obtain the absolute electric current density, |J z |, without disambiguation of 180° in the transverse field directions. The advantage of the method is that the uncertainty in the determination of the ambiguity in the magnetic azimuth is removed. Here, we investigate the limits of the calculation when applied to a numerical MHD model. We have found that the combination of changes in the magnetic azimuth with vanishing horizontal field component leads to errors, where electric current densities are often strong. Where errors occur, the calculation gives |J z | too small by factors typically 1.2–2.0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deloach A C, Hagyard M J, Rabin D, et al. Photospheric electric current and transition region brightness within an active region. Sol Phys, 1984, 91: 235–242

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin Y, Gaizauskas V. Coincidence between Halpha flare kernels and peaks of observed longitudinal electric current densities. Sol Phys, 1987, 109: 81–90

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hagyard M J. Observed nonpotential magnetic fields and the inferred flow of electric currents at a location of repeated flaring. Sol Phys, 1988, 115: 107–124

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Canfield R C, Hudson H S, Leka K D, et al. The X flare of 1991 November 15 — Coordinated Mees/Yohkoh observations. Publ Astron Soc Jpn, 1992, 44: L111–115

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leka K D, Canfield R C, McClymont A N, et al. The morphology of flare phenomena, magnetic fields, and electric currents in active regions. II — NOAA active region 5747 (1989 October). Astrophys J, 1993, 411: 370–377

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. de La Beaujardiere J -F, Canfield R C, Leka K D. The morphology of flare phenomena, magnetic fields, and electric currents in active regions. III — NOAA active region 6233 (1990 August). Astrophys J, 1993, 411: 378–382

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang H, Wang T. Vertical current and a 3B/X12 flare in a highly sheared active region (NOAA 6659) on June 9, 1991. Sol Phys, 1994, 151: 129–136

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu S T, Weng F S, Wang H M, et al. Magnetic structures and energy of 1989 March flares. Adv Space Res, 1993, 13: 127–130

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Driel-Gesztelyi L, Hofmann A, Demoulin P, et al. Relationship between electric currents, photospheric motions, chromospheric activity, and magnetic field topology. Sol Phys, 1994, 149: 309–330

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Metcalf T R, Canfield R C, Hudson H S, et al. Electric currents and coronal heating in NOAA active region 6952. Astrophys J, 1994, 428: 860–866

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gary G A, Demoulin P. Reduction, analysis, and properties of electric current systems in solar active regions. Astrophys J, 1995, 445: 982–998

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Metcalf T R, Canfield R C, et al. What is the spatial relationship between hard X-ray footpoints and vertical electric currents in solar flares? Astrophys J, 1997, 482: 490–497

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Burnette A B, Canfield R C, Pevtsov A A. Photospheric and coronal currents in solar active regions. Astrophys J, 2004, 606: 565–570

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gary A, Moore R L. Eruption of a multiple-turn helical magnetic flux tube in a large flare: Evidence for external and internal reconnection that fits the breakout model of solar magnetic eruptions. Astrophys J, 2004, 611: 545–556

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao Y, Xu H, Zhang H. Probing the method of correcting Faraday rotation in vector magnetograms. Adv Space Res, 2008, 42: 888–894

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Semel M, Skumanich A. An ambiguity-free determination of J-Z in solar active regions. Astron Astrophys, 1998, 331: 383–383

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li J, van Ballegooijen A, Mickey D. Vector magnetic fields and electric currents from the imaging vector magnetograph. Astrophys J, 2009, 692: 1543–1560

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li J, Mickey D L, LaBonte B J. The X3 Flare of 2002 July 15. Astrophys J, 2005, 620: 1092–1100

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cowling T G. The electrical conductivity of an ionized gas in a magnetic field, with applications to the solar atmosphere and the ionosphere. R Soc Lond Proc Ser A, 1945, 183: 453–479

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fan Y, Gibson S E. The emergence of a twisted magnetic flux tube into a preexisting coronal arcade. Astrophys J Lett, 2003, 589: L105–108

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fan Y, Gibson S E. Numerical simulations of three-dimensional coronal magnetic fields resulting from the emergence of twisted magnetic flux tubes. Astrophys J, 2004, 609: 1123–1133

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Fan, Y. Limitations of absolute current densities derived from the Semel & Skumanich method. Sci. China Ser. G-Phys. Mech. Astron. 52, 1678–1685 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-009-0272-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-009-0272-1

Keywords

Navigation