Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling flow transition in a hypersonic boundary layer with Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes approach

  • Published:
Science in China Series G: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes approach, a laminar-turbulence transition model is proposed in this study that takes into account the effects of different instability modes associated with the variations in Mach numbers of compressible boundary layer flows. The model is based on k-ω-γ three-equation eddy-viscosity concept with k representing the fluctuating kinetic energy, ω the specific dissipation rate and the intermittency factor γ. The particular features of the model are that: 1) k includes the non-turbulent, as well as turbulent fluctuations; 2) a transport equation for the intermittency factor γ is proposed here with a source term set to trigger the transition onset; 3) through the introduction of a new length scale normal to wall, the present model employs the local variables only avoiding the use of the integral parameters, like the boundary layer thickness δ, which are often cost-ineffective with the modern CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) methods; 4) in the fully turbulent region, the model retreats to the well-known k-ω SST (Shear Stress Transport) model. This model is validated with a number of available experiments on boundary layer transitions including the incompressible, supersonic and hypersonic flows past flat plates, straight/flared cones at zero incidences, etc. It is demonstrated that the present model can be successfully applied to the engineering calculations of a variety of aerodynamic flow transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fu S, Wang L. Progress in turbulence/transition modelling (in Chinese). Adv Mech, 2007, 37(3): 94–102

    Google Scholar 

  2. Savill A M. One-point closures applied to transition. Turbulence and Transition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996. 233–268

    Google Scholar 

  3. Menter F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J, 1994, 32: 1598–1605

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Menter F R, Langtry R B, Volker S. Transition modelling for general purpose CFD codes. Flow Turbul Combust, 2006, 77: 277–303

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Warren E S, Hassan H A. Transition closure model for predicting transition onset. J Aircraft, 1998, 35(5): 769–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mack L M. Boundary-layer linear stability theory. AGARD Rept, 709, 1984

  7. Mayle R E, Schulz A. The path to predicting bypass transition. ASME J Turbomach, 1997, 119: 405–411

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arnal D, Casalis G. Laminar-turbulent transition prediction in three-dimensional flows. Prog Aerosp Sci, 2000, 36: 173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilcox D C W. Turbulence model transition prediction. AIAA J, 1975, 13: 241–243

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Walker G J. Transition flow an axial turbomachine blading. AIAA J, 1989, 27: 595–602

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Savill A M. New strategies in modelling by-pass transition. In:. Launder B E, Sandham N D, eds. Closure Strategies for Turbulent and Transitional Flows. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 492–521

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dhawan S, Narasimha R. Some properties of boundary-layer flow during transition from laminar to turbulent motion. J Fluid Mech, 1958, 3(4): 414–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lodefier K, Merci B, De Langhe C, et al. Intermittency based RANS bypass transition Modelling. Prog Comput Fluid Dyn, 2006, 6: 68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayle R E. The role of laminar-turbulent transition in gas turbine engines. ASME J Turbomach, 1991, 113: 509–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarkar S, Erlebacher G, Hussaini M Y. The analysis and modeling of dilatational terms in compressible turbulence. J Fluid Mech, 1991, 227: 473–493

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarkar S. The stabilizing effect of compressibility in turbulent shear flow. J Fluid Mech, 1995, 282: 163–186

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schubauer G B, Klebanoff P S. Contribution on the mechanics of boundary layer transition. NACA-TN-3489, 1955

  18. Chen F J, Malik M R, Beckwith I E. Boundary-layer transition on a cone and flat plate at Mach 3.5. AIAA J, 1989, 27(6): 687–693

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. McDaniel R D, Nance R P, Hassan H A. Transition onset prediction for high-speed flow. J Spacecr Rockets, 2000, 37: 304–309

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lachowicz J T, Chokani N, Wilkinson S P. Boundary-layer stability measurements in a hypersonic quiet tunnel. AIAA J, 1996, 34(12): 2496–2500

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. White F M. Viscous Fluid Flow. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Song Fu.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 10232020 and 90505005)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, L., Fu, S. Modelling flow transition in a hypersonic boundary layer with Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes approach. Sci. China Ser. G-Phys. Mech. Astron. 52, 768–774 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-009-0047-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-009-0047-8

Keywords

Navigation