Skip to main content
Log in

A framework for multi-robot motion planning from temporal logic specifications

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a framework for the coordination of a network of robots with respect to formal requirement specifications expressed in temporal logics. A regular tessellation is used to partition the space of interest into a union of disjoint regular and equal cells with finite facets, and each cell can only be occupied by a robot or an obstacle. Each robot is assumed to be equipped with a finite collection of continuous-time nonlinear closed-loop dynamics to be operated in. The robot is then modeled as a hybrid automaton for capturing the finitely many modes of operation for either staying within the current cell or reaching an adjacent cell through the corresponding facet. By taking the motion capabilities into account, a bisimilar discrete abstraction of the hybrid automaton can be constructed. Having the two systems bisimilar, all properties that are expressible in temporal logics such as Linear-time Temporal Logic, Computation Tree Logic, and µ-calculus can be preserved. Motion planning can then be performed at a discrete level by considering the parallel composition of discrete abstractions of the robots with a requirement specification given in a suitable temporal logic. The bisimilarity ensures that the discrete planning solutions are executable by the robots. For demonstration purpose, a finite automaton is used as the abstraction and the requirement specification is expressed in Computation Tree Logic. The model checker Cadence SMV is used to generate coordinated verified motion planning solutions. Two autonomous aerial robots are used to demonstrate how the proposed framework may be applied to solve coordinated motion planning problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balch T, Arkin R C. Behavior-based formation control for multirobot teams. IEEE Trans Robot Autom, 1998, 14: 926–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fierro R, Das A K, Kumar V, et al. Hybrid control of formations of robots. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, 2001. 157–162

  3. Zachery R A, Sastry S S, Kumar V. Special issue on swarming in natural and engineered systems. Proc IEEE, 2011, 99: 1466–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Klavins E, Koditschek D E. A formalism for the composition of concurrent robot rehaviors. In: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, 2000. 3395–3402

  5. Alami R, Fleury S, Herrb M, et al. Multi-robot cooperation in the MARTHA project. IEEE Robot Autom Mag, 1998, 5: 36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gerkey B P, Mataric M J. Sold: Auction methods for multirobot coordination. IEEE Trans Robot Autom, 2002, 18: 758–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Egerstedt M, Hu X. A hybrid control approach to action coordination for mobile robots. Automatica, 2002, 38: 125–130

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Egerstedt M, Martin C F. Conflict resolution for autonomous vehicles: A case study in hierarchical control design. Int J Hybrid Syst, 2002, 2: 221–234

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alur R, Esposito J, Kim M, et al. Formal modeling and analysis of hybrid systems: A case study in multi-robot coordination. In: World Congress on Formal Methods in the Development of Computing Systems, Toulouse, 1999. Goos G, Hartmanis J, Van Leeuwen J, eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1999, 1708: 212–232

  10. Koo T J, Sastry S. Bisimulation based hierarchical system architecture for single-agent multi-modal systems. In: Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, Stanford, 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2002, 2289: 281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Antoniotti M, Mishra B. Discrete event models + temporal logic = supervisory controller: Automatic synthesis of locomotion controllers. In: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE Conference on Robotics & Automation, Nagoya, 1995. 1441–1446

  12. Quottrup M M, Bak T, Izadi-Zamanabadi R. Multi-robot planning: A timed automata approach. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Barcelona, 2004. 4417–4422

  13. Fainekos G E, Kress-Gazit H, Pappas G J. Temporal logic motion planning for mobile robots. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, 2005. 2020–2025

  14. Belta C, Isler V, Pappas G J. Discrete abstractions for robot planning and control in polygonal environments. IEEE Trans Robot, 2005, 21: 864–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fainekos G E, Kress-Gazit H, Pappas G J. Hybrid controllers for path planning: A temporal logic approach. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and the European Control Conference, Seville, 2005. 4885–4890

  16. Kloetzer M, Belta C. A fully automated framework for Control of linear systems from LTL specifications. In: Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, Santa Barbara, 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2006, 3927: 333–347

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Kloetzer M, Belta C. LTL planning for groups of robots. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing, and Control, Ft. Lauderdale, 2006. 578–583

  18. Kloetzer M, Belta C. Automatic deployment of distributed teams of robots from temporal logic motion specifications. IEEE Trans Robot, 2010, 26: 48–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen Y, Ding X C, Stefanescu A, et al. A formal approach to deployment of robotic teams in an urban-like environment. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotics Systems (DARS), Lausanne, 2010

  20. Smith S L, Tumova J, Belta C, et al. Optimal path planning for surveillance with temporal-logic constraints. Int J Robot Res, 2011, 30: 1695–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fainekos G E, Girard A, Kress-Gazit H, et al. Temporal logic motion planning for dynamic robots. Automatica, 2009, 45: 343–352

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Clarke E M, Grumberg O, Peled D A. Model Checking. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  23. McMillan K L. Symbolic Model Checking. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. McMillan K L. Getting started with SMV: User’s manual. Berkeley: Cadence Berkeley Laboratories, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chutinan A, Krogh B H. Verification of infinite-state dynamic systems using approximate quotient transition systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2001, 46: 1401–1410

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Podelski A, Wagner S. Model checking of hybrid systems: from reachability towards stability. In: Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, Santa Barbara, 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2006, 3927: 507–521

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Pappas G J. Bisimilar linear systems. Automatica, 2003, 39: 2035–2047

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Koo T J, Clifton C A, Hemingway G. Cascaded control design for a quadrotor aerial robot. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Asian Control Conference, Bali, 2006. 989–993

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. John Koo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koo, T.J., Li, R., Quottrup, M.M. et al. A framework for multi-robot motion planning from temporal logic specifications. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 55, 1675–1692 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-012-4605-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-012-4605-8

Keywords

Navigation