Skip to main content
Log in

Transcranial direct current stimulation inhibits epileptic activity propagation in a large-scale brain network model

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that uses constant, low-intensity direct current to regulate brain activities. Clinical studies have shown that cathode-tDCS (c-tDCS) is effective in reducing seizure frequency in patients with epilepsy. Due to the heterogeneity and patient specificity of seizures, patient-specific epilepsy networks are increasingly important in exploring the regulatory role of c-tDCS. In this study, we first set the left hippocampus, para-hippocampus, and amygdala as the epileptogenic zone (EZ), and the left inferior temporal cortex and ventral temporal cortex as the initial propagation zone (PZ) to establish a large-scale epilepsy network model. Then we set tDCS cathode locations according to the maximum average energy of the simulated EEG signals and systematically study c-tDCS inhibitory effects on the propagation of epileptic activity. The results show that c-tDCS is effective in suppressing the propagation of epileptic activity. Further, to consider the patient specificity, we set specific EZ and PZ according to the clinical diagnosis of 6 patients and establish patient-specific epileptic networks. We find that c-tDCS can suppress the propagation of abnormal activity in most patient-specific epileptic networks. However, when the PZ is widely distributed in both hemispheres, the treatment effect of c-tDCS is not satisfactory. Hence, we propose dual-cathode tDCS. For epilepsy models with a wide distribution of PZ, it can inhibit the propagation of epileptiform activity in other nodes except EZ and PZ without increasing the tDCS current strength. Our results provide theoretical support for the treatment of epilepsy with tDCS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Proposal for Classification of Epilepsies and Epileptic Syndromes. Epilepsia, 1985, 26: 268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perucca E, French J, Bialer M. Development of new antiepileptic drugs: Challenges, incentives, and recent advances. Lancet Neurol, 2007, 6: 793–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Téllez-Zenteno J F, Dhar R, Wiebe S. Long-term seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain, 2005, 128: 1188–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Y, Schroeder G M, Sinha N, et al. Personalised network modelling in epilepsy. arXiv: 1901.01024

  5. Rolston J D. Surgical strategies for epilepsy in eloquent areas. J Epilepsy, 2016, 2: 1

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jehi L E, Silveira D C, Bingaman W, et al. Temporal lobe epilepsy surgery failures: Predictors of seizure recurrence, yield of reevaluation, and outcome following reoperation. JNS, 2010, 113: 1186–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nitsche M A, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol, 2000, 527: 633–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nitsche M A, Cohen L G, Wassermann E M, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul, 2008, 1: 206–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brunoni A R, Nitsche M A, Bolognini N, et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul, 2012, 5: 175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaufmann E, Hordt M, Lauseker M, et al. Acute effects of spaced cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in drug resistant focal epilepsies. Clin Neurophysiol, 2021, 132: 1444–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boggio P S, Rigonatti S P, Ribeiro R B, et al. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol, 2008, 11: 249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Broeder S, Nackaerts E, Heremans E, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: Neurophysiological mechanisms and behavioral effects. Neurosci Biobehaval Rev, 2015, 57: 105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fregni F, Boggio P S, Lima M C, et al. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain, 2006, 122: 197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajji T K. Transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2019, 106: 776–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sudbrack-Oliveira P, Barbosa M Z, Thome-Souza S, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the management of epilepsy: A systematic review. Seizure, 2021, 86: 85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. San-juan D, Morales-Quezada L, Orozco Garduño A J, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in epilepsy. Brain Stimul, 2015, 8: 455–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tekturk P, Erdogan E T, Kurt A, et al. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on seizure frequency of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2016, 149: 27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fregni F, Thome-Souza S, Nitsche M A, et al. A controlled clinical trial of cathodal DC polarization in patients with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia, 2006, 47: 335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Auvichayapat N, Rotenberg A, Gersner R, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of refractory childhood focal epilepsy. Brain Stimul, 2013, 6: 696–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Varga E T, Terney D, Atkins M D, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in refractory continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep: A controlled study. Epilepsy Res, 2011, 97: 142–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yook S W, Park S H, Seo J H, et al. Suppression ofseizure by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in an epileptic patient—A case report. Ann Rehabil Med, 2011, 35: 579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. San-Juan D, Espinoza López D A, Vázquez Gregorio R, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis. Brain Stimul, 2017, 10: 28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meiron O, Gale R, Namestnic J, et al. High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in early onset epileptic encephalopathy: A case study. Brain Injury, 2018, 32: 135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Meiron O, Gale R, Namestnic J, et al. Antiepileptic effects of a novel non-invasive neuromodulation treatment in a subject with early-onset epileptic encephalopathy: Case report with 20 sessions of HD-tDCS intervention. Front Neurosci, 2019, 13: 547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rezakhani S, Amiri M, Weckhuysen S, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of seizure onset zone-targeting high-definition cathodal tDCS in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol, 2022, 136: 219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Majhi S, Perc M, Ghosh D. Dynamics on higher-order networks: A review. J R Soc Interface, 2022, 19: 20220043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Parastesh F, Jafari S, Azarnoush H, et al. Chimeras. Phys Rep, 2021, 898: 1–114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Gosak M, Milojević M, Duh M, et al. Networks behind the morphology and structural design of living systems. Phys Life Rev, 2022, 41: 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ma J. Biophysical neurons, energy, and synapse controllability: A review. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A, 2022, 24: 109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu S F, Wang L B, Zhao Y W, et al. Chronic electrical stimulation induces functional network changes in cortical neuron cultures. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lu H, Gallinaro J V, Rotter S. Network remodeling induced by transcranial brain stimulation: A computational model of tDCS-triggered cell assembly formation. Network Neurosci, 2019, 3: 924–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rahman A, Lafon B, Bikson M. Multilevel computational models for predicting the cellular effects of noninvasive brain stimulation. In: Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier, 2015. 25–40

  33. Molaee-Ardekani B, Márquez-Ruiz J, Merlet I, et al. Effects of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on cortical activity: A computational modeling study. Brain Stimul, 2013, 6: 25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kunze T, Hunold A, Haueisen J, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation changes resting state functional connectivity: A large-scale brain network modeling study. NeuroImage, 2016, 140: 174–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Denoyer Y, Merlet I, Wendling F, et al. Modelling acute and lasting effects of tDCS on epileptic activity. J Comput Neurosci, 2020, 48: 161–176

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Jirsa V K, Proix T, Perdikis D, et al. The Virtual Epileptic Patient: Individualized whole-brain models of epilepsy spread. Neuroimage, 2017, 145: 377–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu Z L, Yu Y, Wang Q Y. Functional modular organization unfolded by chimera-like dynamics in a large-scale brain network model. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 1435–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Coronel-Oliveros C, Cofré R, Orio P. Cholinergic neuromodulation of inhibitory interneurons facilitates functional integration in whole-brain models. PLoS Comput Biol, 2021, 17: e1008737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang C, Liu Z, Wang Q, et al. Epileptic seizures in a heterogeneous excitatory network with short-term plasticity. Cogn Neurodyn, 2021, 15: 43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang C, Luan G, Wang Q, et al. Localization of epileptogenic zone with the correction of pathological networks. Front Neurol, 2018, 9: 143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kötter R. Online retrieval, processing, and visualization of primate connectivity data from the CoCoMac database. Neuroinformatics, 2004, 2: 127–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jansen B H, Rit V G. Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biol Cybern, 1995, 73: 357–366

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Kulik S D, Douw L, van Dellen E, et al. Modeling of individual neurophysiological brain connectivity. Neuroscience, 2022

  44. Sanz-Leon P, Knock S A, Spiegler A, et al. Mathematical framework for large-scale brain network modeling in The Virtual Brain. Neuroimage, 2015, 111: 385–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sanz Leon P, Knock S A, Woodman M M, et al. The Virtual Brain: A simulator of primate brain network dynamics. Front Neuroinform, 2013, 7: 10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Huang Y, Datta A, Bikson M, et al. Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation—ROAST—A fully automated open-source pipeline. J Neural Eng, 2019, 16: 056006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pion-Tonachini L, Hsu S H, Chang C Y, et al. Online automatic artifact rejection using the real-time EEG source-mapping toolbox (REST). In: 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Honolulu: IEEE, 2018. 106–109

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fang Han or QingYun Wang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12202027, 11932003, 12272092, 11972115) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2021TQ0025).

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available online at tech.scichina.com and link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, Y., Fan, Y., Han, F. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation inhibits epileptic activity propagation in a large-scale brain network model. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 3628–3638 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2341-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2341-x

Navigation