Skip to main content
Log in

Harmonic reducer in-situ fault diagnosis for industrial robots based on deep learning

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The harmonic reducer is an essential kinetic transmission component in the industrial robots. It is easy to be fatigued and resulted in physical malfunction after a long period of operation. Therefore, an accurate in-situ fault diagnosis for the harmonic reducers in an industrial robot is especially important. This paper proposes a fault diagnosis method based on deep learning for the harmonic reducer of industrial robots via consecutive time-domain vibration signals. Considering the sampling signals from industrial robots are long, narrow, and channel-independent, this method combined a 1-dimensional convolutional neural network with matrix kernels (1-D MCNN) adaptive model. By adjusting the size of the convolution kernels, it can concentrate on the contextual feature extraction of consecutive time-domain data while retaining the ability to process the multi-channel fusion data. The proposed method is examined on a physical industrial robot platform, which has achieved a prediction accuracy of 99%. Its performance is appeared to be superior in comparison to the traditional 2-dimensional CNN, deep sparse automatic encoding network (DSAE), multilayer perceptual network (MLP), and support vector machine (SVM).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hwang I, Kim S, Kim Y, et al. A survey of fault detection, isolation, and reconfiguration methods. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2009, 18: 636–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abid A, Khan M T, Iqbal J. A review on fault detection and diagnosis techniques: Basics and beyond. Artif Intell Rev, 2021, 54: 3639–3664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khalastchi E, Kalech M. On fault detection and diagnosis in robotic systems. ACM Comput Surv, 2018, 51: 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McIntyre M L, Dixon W E, Dawson D M, et al. Fault identification for robot manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot, 2005, 21: 1028–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xiao B, Yin S. An intelligent actuator fault reconstruction scheme for robotic manipulators. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2017, 48: 639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Luca A, Ferrajoli L. A modified Newton-Euler method for dynamic computations in robot fault detection and control. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Kobe, 2009. 3359–3364

  7. Yin S, Ding S X, Xie X, et al. A review on basic data-driven approaches for industrial process monitoring. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2014, 61: 6418–6428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang D, Qian L, Mao B, et al. A data-driven design for fault detection of wind turbines using random forests and XGboost. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 21020–21031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gertler J, Cao J. PCA-based fault diagnosis in the presence of control and dynamics. AIChE J, 2004, 50: 388–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Muradore R, Fiorini P. A PLS-based statistical approach for fault detection and isolation of robotic manipulators. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2011, 59: 3167–3175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Akerkar R, Sajja P. Knowledge-Based Systems. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  12. Feng Z, Zhou Z, Hu C, et al. Fault diagnosis based on belief rule base with considering attribute correlation. IEEE Access, 2017, 6: 2055–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abid A, Khan M T, Ullah A, et al. Real time health monitoring of industrial machine using multiclass support vector machine. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Control and Robotics Engineering (ICCRE). Bangkok, 2017. 77–81

  14. Pettersson O. Execution monitoring in robotics: A survey. Robotics Autonomous Syst, 2005, 53: 73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Freyermuth B. Knowledge based incipient fault diagnosis of industrial robots. IFAC Proc Volumes, 1991, 24: 369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabry A H, Nordin F H, Sabry A H, et al. Fault detection and diagnosis of industrial robot based on power consumption modeling. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2019, 67: 7929–7940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jaber A A, Bicker R. Industrial robot backlash fault diagnosis based on discrete wavelet transform and artificial neural network. Am J Mech Eng, 2016, 4: 21–31

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vallachira S, Orkisz M, Norrlof M, et al. Data-driven gearbox failure detection in industrial robots. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2019, 16: 193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Masoumi M, Alimohammadi H. An investigation into the vibration of harmonic drive systems. Front Mech Eng, 2013, 8: 409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Y, Tan C, Zhao Y, et al. Nonlinear attributes modeling and analysis of harmonic drive manipulator joint. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (IC-CAR). Nagoya, 2017. 256–264

  21. Jaber A A, Bicker R. Fault diagnosis of industrial robot gears based on discrete wavelet transform and artificial neural network. Insight, 2016, 58: 179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo L, Lei Y, Li N, et al. Deep convolution feature learning for health indicator construction of bearings. In: Proceedings of the Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Harbin). Harbin, 2017. 1–6

  23. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 2012, 25: 1097–1105

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jia F, Lei Y, Lin J, et al. Deep neural networks: A promising tool for fault characteristic mining and intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery with massive data. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2016, 72–73: 303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu R, Yang B, Zio E, et al. Artificial intelligence for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: A review. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2018, 108: 33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen Z, Mauricio A, Li W, et al. A deep learning method for bearing fault diagnosis based on cyclic spectral coherence and convolutional neural networks. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2020, 140: 106683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jia F, Lei Y, Lu N, et al. Deep normalized convolutional neural network for imbalanced fault classification of machinery and its understanding via visualization. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2018, 110: 349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ince T, Kiranyaz S, Eren L, et al. Real-time motor fault detection by 1-D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2016, 63: 7067–7075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lei Y, Yang B, Jiang X, et al. Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2020, 138: 106587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cui X, Goel V, Kingsbury B. Data augmentation for deep neural network acoustic modeling. IEEE ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process, 2015, 23: 1469–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen L, Cao J, Wu K, et al. Application of generalized frequency response functions and improved convolutional neural network to fault diagnosis of heavy-duty industrial robot. Robot Comput Integr Manuf, 2022, 73: 102228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wen L, Li X, Gao L, et al. A new convolutional neural network-based data-driven fault diagnosis method. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2017, 65: 5990–5998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu B, Wang N, Chen T, et al. Empirical evaluation of rectified activations in convolutional network. arXiv: 1505.00853, 2015

  34. Liu R, Meng G, Yang B, et al. Dislocated time series convolutional neural architecture: An intelligent fault diagnosis approach for electric machine. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2016, 13: 1310–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tang S, Shen C, Wang D, et al. Adaptive deep feature learning network with Nesterov momentum and its application to rotating machinery fault diagnosis. Neurocomputing, 2018, 305: 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li B, Chow M Y, Tipsuwan Y, et al. Neural-network-based motor rolling bearing fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2000, 47: 1060–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Medvedev M, Kadhim A, Brosalin D. Development of the neural-based navigation system for a ground-based mobile robot. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering (ICMRE). Budapest, 2021. 35–40

  38. Hong Y, Sun Z, Zou X, et al. Multi-joint industrial robot fault identification using deep sparse auto-encoder network with attitude data. In: Proceedings of the Prognostics and Health Management Conference (PHM-Besançon). Besancon, 2020. 176–179

  39. Chen W Y, Xu J X, Panda S. Application of artificial intelligence techniques to the study of machine signatures. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Machines. Marseille, 2012. 2390–2396

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JiHong Chen.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2020B1515120010).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Zhou, H., He, Y. et al. Harmonic reducer in-situ fault diagnosis for industrial robots based on deep learning. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 65, 2116–2126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2129-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2129-9

Keywords

Navigation