Skip to main content
Log in

The flexural property and its synergistic mechanism of multibody molded beetle elytron plates

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To improve the applications of beetle elytron plates (BEPs, which are biomimetic sandwich plates inspired by beetle elytra), the flexural performance and its synergistic mechanism of multibody molded BEPs were investigated via cantilever testing and finite element method (FEM). The results are summarized as follows. (1) Although debonding damage causes failure of the multibody molded BEPs and honeycomb plate and the reasonable range of trabecular size for BEPs is narrow, both the optimal loading capacity per mass and failure deformation of the BEPs are over two times those of the honeycomb plate. (2) A flexural synergistic mechanism is revealed in the trabecular-honeycomb core structure of BEPs; this mechanism causes the maximum deformation of core structure to gradually transfer from the honeycomb wall to the trabeculae with the increase in η (the ratio of the trabecular radius to the distance between the center points of two trabeculae), which means the different stretching behaviors in these core structures. (3) Unlike the compressive mechanism of BEPs, by controlling and balancing the deformation degrees of the trabeculae and honeycomb walls, the flexural mechanism achieves a minimum core deformation and an optimal flexural performance. These results suggest a qualitative relationship between the deformation behavior of trabecular-honeycomb core structure and bending performance of the whole BEP, and provide a solid foundation for subsequent research and the considerable application potential of this biomimetic sandwich structure in many fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen H G. Analysis and Design of Structural Sandwich Panels. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lira C, Scarpa F. Transverse shear stiffness of thickness gradient honeycombs. Compos Sci Tech, 2010, 70: 930–936

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hou Y, Tai Y H, Lira C, et al. The bending and failure of sandwich structures with auxetic gradient cellular cores. Compos Part A-Appl Sci Manufacturing, 2013, 49: 119–131

    Google Scholar 

  4. Imbalzano G, Linforth S, Ngo T D, et al. Blast resistance of auxetic and honeycomb sandwich panels: Comparisons and parametric designs. Composite Struct, 2017, 183: 242–261

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herrmann A S, Zahlen P C, Zuardy I, et al. Sandwich structures technology in commercial aviation. In: Sandwich Structures 7: Advancing with Sandwich Structures and Materials. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005. 13–26

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor E A, Glanville J P, Clegg R A, et al. Hypervelocity impact on spacecraft honeycomb: Hydrocode simulation and damage laws. Int J Impact Eng, 2003, 29: 691–702

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xiao Y, Hu Y, Zhang J, et al. The bending responses of sandwich panels with aluminium honeycomb core and CFRP skins used in electric vehicle body. Adv Mater Sci Eng, 2018, 2018: 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Shi C, Yang N, et al. Strength, stiffness, and panel peeling strength of carbon fiber-reinforced composite sandwich structures with aluminum honeycomb cores for vehicle body. Composite Struct, 2018, 184: 1189–1196

    Google Scholar 

  9. Magnucki K. Bending of symmetrically sandwich beams and I-beams —Analytical study. Int J Mech Sci, 2019, 150: 411–419

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao C Q, Ma J, Du S C. The mechanical behaviour of new long-span hollow-core roofs based on aluminum alloy honeycomb panels. Materiali in Tehnologije, 2019, 53: 311–318

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hering G K. Method and device for joining sections of thermoplastic continuous web material. US Patent No. 7559351B2, 2009

  12. Smardzewski J, Słonina M, Maslej M. Stiffness and failure behaviour of wood based honeycomb sandwich corner joints in different climates. Composite Struct, 2017, 168: 153–163

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sun G, Huo X, Chen D, et al. Experimental and numerical study on honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and in-panel compression. Mater Des, 2017, 133: 154–168

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sahu S K, Badgayan N D, Samanta S, et al. Influence of cell size on out of plane stiffness and in-plane compliance character of the sandwich beam made with tunable PCTPE nylon honeycomb core and hybrid polymer nanocomposite skin. Int J Mech Sci, 2018, 148: 284–292

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smardzewski J, Kramski D. Modelling stiffness of furniture manufactured from honeycomb panels depending on changing climate conditions. Thin-Walled Struct, 2019, 137: 295–302

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y C, Foster A. Experimental and numerical study of temperature developments in PIR core sandwich panels with joint. Fire Saf J, 2017, 90: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yaseer Omar M, Xiang C, Gupta N, et al. Syntactic foam core metal matrix sandwich composite: Compressive properties and strain rate effects. Mater Sci Eng-A, 2015, 643: 156–168

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shunmugasamy V C, Mansoor B. Aluminum foam sandwich with density-graded open-cell core: Compressive and flexural response. Mater Sci Eng-A, 2018, 731: 220–230

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sun G, Wang E, Wang H, et al. Low-velocity impact behaviour of sandwich panels with homogeneous and stepwise graded foam cores. Mater Des, 2018, 160: 1117–1136

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chiras S, Mumm D R, Evans A G, et al. The structural performance of near-optimized truss core panels. Int J Solids Struct, 2002, 39: 4093–4115

    Google Scholar 

  21. Arunkumar M, Pitchaimani J, Gangadharan K. Bending and free vibration analysis of foam-filled truss core sandwich panel. J Sandwich Struct Mater, 2018, 20: 617–638

    Google Scholar 

  22. Xu J, Wu Y, Wang L, et al. Compressive properties of hollow lattice truss reinforced honeycombs (Honeytubes) by additive manufacturing: Patterning and tube alignment effects. Mater Des, 2018, 156: 446–457

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao X, Gao Q, Wang L, et al. Dynamic crushing of double-arrowed auxetic structure under impact loading. Mater Des, 2018, 160: 527–537

    Google Scholar 

  24. Balci O, Çoban O, Bora M Ö, et al. Experimental investigation of single and repeated impacts for repaired honeycomb sandwich structures. Mater Sci Eng-A, 2017, 682: 23–30

    Google Scholar 

  25. Imbalzano G, Tran P, Ngo T D, et al. Three-dimensional modelling of auxetic sandwich panels for localised impact resistance. J Sandwich Struct Mater, 2017, 19: 291–316

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ha N S, Lu G, Xiang X. Energy absorption of a bio-inspired honeycomb sandwich panel. J Mater Sci, 2019, 54: 6286–6300

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fratzl P, Weinkamer R. Nature’s hierarchical materials. Prog Mater Sci, 2007, 52: 1263–1334

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tao Y, Li W, Wei K, et al. Mechanical properties and energy absorption of 3D printed square hierarchical honeycombs under in-plane axial compression. Compos Part B-Eng, 2019, 176: 107219

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen Y, Li T, Jia Z, et al. 3d printed hierarchical honeycombs with shape integrity under large compressive deformations. Mater Des, 2018, 137: 226–234

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tsang H H, Raza S. Impact energy absorption of bio-inspired tubular sections with structural hierarchy. Composite Struct, 2018, 195: 199–210

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sun J, Wu W, Song Z, et al. Bio-inspirations for the development of light materials based on the nanomechanical properties and microstructures of beetle dynastes tityus. J Bionic Eng, 2019, 16: 154–163

    Google Scholar 

  32. Noh M Y, Muthukrishnan S, Kramer K J, et al. Development and ultrastructure of the rigid dorsal and flexible ventral cuticles of the elytron of the red flour beetle, tribolium castaneum. Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 2017, 91: 21–33

    Google Scholar 

  33. Parker A R, Welch V L, Driver D, et al. Opal analogue discovered in a weevil. Nature, 2003, 426: 786–787

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chen J X, Ni Q Q. Three dimensional composite structures in the fore-wing of beetles. Acta Mater Compos Sin, 2003, 20: 61–66

    Google Scholar 

  35. Linz D M, Hu A W, Sitvarin M I, et al. Functional value of elytra under various stresses in the red flour beetle, tribolium castaneum. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 34813

    Google Scholar 

  36. Le T Q, Truong T V, Tran H T, et al. How could Beetle’s Elytra support their own weight during forward flight? J Bionic Eng, 2014, 11: 529–540

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen J, Wu G. Beetle forewings: Epitome of the optimal design for lightweight composite materials. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2013, 91: 659–665

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chen J, Zu Q, Wu G, et al. Review of beetle forewing structures and their biomimetic applications in China: (II) On the three-dimensional structure, modeling and imitation. Mater Sci Eng-C, 2015, 55: 620–633

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang X, Liu C, Chen J, et al. The influence mechanism of processing holes on the flexural properties of biomimetic integrated honeycomb plates. Mater Sci Eng-C, 2016, 69: 798–803

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chen J, Zhang X, Okabe Y, et al. The deformation mode and strengthening mechanism of compression in the beetle elytron plate. Mater Des, 2017, 131: 481–486

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen J X, Zhang X M, Okabe Y, et al. Beetle elytron plate and the synergistic mechanism of a trabecular-honeycomb core structure. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: 87–93

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang X, Chen J, Okabe Y, et al. Compression properties of metal beetle elytron plates and the elementary unit of the trabecular-honeycomb core structure. J Sandwich Struct Mater, 2019, 21: 2031–2041

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang X, Chen J, Okabe Y, et al. Influence of honeycomb dimensions and forming methods on the compressive properties of beetle elytron plates. J Sandwich Struct Mater, 2020, 22: 28–39

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yu X, Pan L, Chen J, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the energy absorption abilities of trabecular-honeycomb biomimetic structures inspired by beetle elytra. J Mater Sci, 2019, 54: 2193–2204

    Google Scholar 

  45. Xiang J, Du J. Energy absorption characteristics of bio-inspired honeycomb structure under axial impact loading. Mater Sci Eng-A, 2017, 696: 283–289

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hao P, Du J. Energy absorption characteristics of bio-inspired honeycomb column thin-walled structure under impact loading. J Mech Behav BioMed Mater, 2018, 79: 301–308

    Google Scholar 

  47. Xu M, Pan L, Chen J, et al. The flexural properties of end-trabecular beetle elytron plates and their flexural failure mechanism. J Mater Sci, 2019, 54: 8414–8425

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JinXiang Chen.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51875102, 51578136).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, X., Zhang, X., Chen, J. et al. The flexural property and its synergistic mechanism of multibody molded beetle elytron plates. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 63, 768–776 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1470-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1470-5

Keywords

Navigation