Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of settlement behaviors of high-food-waste-content (HFWC) and low-food-waste-content (LFWC) MSWs and assessment of their prediction models

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Settlement behaviors of high-food-waste-content (HFWC) and low-food-waste-content (LFWC) municipal solid wastes (MSWs) respectively from developing and developed countries were characterized and compared based on a great number of experimental datasets from references. Fresh HFWC-MSW generally has larger primary compression ratio compared to fresh LFWC-MSW, due to the release of a large amount of intra-particle water contained in food waste under additional stresses. The slopes of strain-logarithmic time curves with respect to the three secondary compression phases are characterized as “slight-steep-slight” for LFWC-MSW and “moderate-moderate-slight” for HFWC-MSW. It is difficult to distinguish the first two phases of the secondary compression in strain-logarithmic time curves for HFWC-MSW. The entropy method was built to evaluate the performance and applicability of nine published settlement models based on the settlement datasets of four large-scale experiments. The computational simplicity, the fitting performance, the prediction performance and the parametric stability were taken as the four criterions in the entropy method. Based on the evaluation results, the models proposed by Sowers et al. (1973) and Gourc et al. (2010) are recommended for predicting settlement at LFWC-MSW landfills, while the hyperbolic model and the Chen et al. (2010) model are recommended for HFWC-MSW landfills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sowers G F. Settlement of waste disposal fills. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics, and Foundation on Engineering. Moscow, 1973. 207–210

  2. Gourc J P, Staub M J, Conte M. Decoupling MSW settlement into mechanical and biochemical processes-Modelling and validation on large-scale setups. Waste Manage, 2010, 30: 1556–1568

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Y M, Ke H, Fredlund D G, et al. Secondary compression of Municipal solid wastes and a compression model for predicting settlement of municipal solid waste landfills. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2010, 136: 706–717

    Google Scholar 

  4. Machado S L, Carvalho M. Constitutive model for municipal solid waste incorporating mechanical creep and biodegradation-induced compression. Waste Manage, 2009, 30: 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  5. Babu SGL, Reddy K R, Chouskey S K, et al. Prediction of long-term municipal solid waste landfill settlement using constitutive model. Practice Periodical Hazardous, Toxic, Radioactive Waste Manage, 2010, 14: 139–150

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laner D, Crest M, Scharff H, et al. A review of approaches for the long-term management of municipal solid waste landfills. Waste Manage, 2012, 32: 498–512

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ling H I, Leshchinsky D, Mohri Y, et al. Estimation of municipal solid waste landfill settlement. J Geotechnical GeoEnviron Eng, 1998, 124: 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xie Q. A study on the settlement of sanitary landfill of municipal solid waste (in Chinese). Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu C N, Chen R H, Chen K S. Unsaturated consolidation theory for the prediction of long-term municipal solid waste landfill settlement. Waste Manag Res, 2006, 24: 80–91

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yen B C, Scanlon B. Sanitary landfill settlement rates. J Geotech Eng Div, 1975, 101: 475–487

    Google Scholar 

  11. Park H I, Lee S R. Long-term settlement behavior of landfills with refuse decomposition. Res Manage Technol, 1997, 24: 159–165

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yuen S T, Styles J R. Settlement and characteristics of waste at a municipal solid waste landfill in Melbourne. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. Melbourne, 2000

  13. Olivier F, Gourc J P. Hydro-mechanical behavior of municipal solid waste subject to leachate recirculation in a large-scale compression reactor cell. Waste Manage, 2007, 27: 44–58

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swati M, Joseph K. Settlement analysis of fresh and partially stabilised municipal solid waste in simulated controlled dumps and bioreactor landfills. Waste Manage, 2008, 28: 1355–1363

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ivanova L K, Richards D J, Smallman D J. The long-term settlement of landfill waste. Water Resour Manage, 2008, 161: 121–133

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bareither C A, Breitmeyer R J, Benson C H, et al. Deer track bioreactor experiment: Field-scale evaluation of municipal solid waste bioreactor performance. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2012, 138: 658–670

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bareither C A, Benson C H, Edil T B. Compression behavior of municipal solid waste: Immediate compression. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2012, 138: 1047–1062

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bareither C A, Benson C H, Edil T B. Compression of municipal solid waste in bioreactor landfills: Mechanical creep and biocompression. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2013, 139: 1007–1021

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fei XC, Zekkos D. Factors influencing long-term settlement of municipal solid waste in laboratory bioreactor landfill simulators. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste, 2013, 17: 259–271

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heshmati R A A, Mokhtari M, Shakiba Rad S. Prediction of the compression ratio for municipal solid waste using decision tree. Waste Manag Res, 2014, 32: 64–69

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhan L T, Xu H, Chen Y M, et al. Biochemical, hydrological and mechanical behaviors of high food waste content MSW landfill: Preliminary findings from a large-scale experiment. Waste Manage, 2017, 63: 27–40

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhan L T, Xu H, Chen Y M, et al. Biochemical, hydrological and mechanical behaviors of high food waste content MSW landfill: Liquid-gas interactions observed from a large-scale experiment. Waste Manage, 2017, 68: 307–318

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bjarngard A, Edgers L. Settlement of municipal solid waste landfills. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Madison Waste Conference. Madison, 1990. 192–205

  24. Hossain M S, Gabr M A. Prediction of municipal solid waste landfill settlement with leachate recirculation. In: Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2005 Congress. Austin, 2005. 1–14

  25. Sivakumar Babu G L, Reddy K R, Chouksey S K. Constitutive model for municipal solid waste incorporating mechanical creep and biode-gradation-induced compression. Waste Manage, 2010, 30: 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marques ACM, Filz G M, Vilar O M. Composite compressibility model for municipal solid waste. J Geotechnical GeoEnviron Eng, 2003, 129: 372–378

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shi J Y, Qian X D, Liu X D, et al. The behavior of compression and degradation for municipal solid waste and combined settlement calculation method. Waste Manage, 2016, 55: 154–164

    Google Scholar 

  28. Park H I, Park B, Lee S R, et al. Parameter evaluation and performance comparison of MSW settlement Prediction models in various landfill types. J Environ Eng, 2007, 133: 64–72

    Google Scholar 

  29. Edil T B, Ranguette V J, Wuellner W W. Settlement of municipal refuse. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Geotechnics of Waste Fills—Theory and Practice. STP 1070. West Conshohocken: ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1990. 225–239

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gao W, Bian X C, Xu W J, et al. An equivalent-time-lines model for municipal solid waste based on its compression characteristics. Waste Manage, 2017, 68: 292–306

    Google Scholar 

  31. Siddiqui A A, Powrie W, Richards D J. Settlement characteristics of mechanically biologically treated wastes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2013, 139: 1676–1689

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bareither C A, Kwak S. Assessment of municipal solid waste settlement models based on field-scale data analysis. Waste Manage, 2015, 42: 101–117

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bareither C A. Compression behavior of solid waste. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xu H. Large-scale experiment on biochemo-hydro-mechanical behaviors of high-food- waste-conetnt MSW and applications (in Chinese). Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Hangzou: Zhejiang University, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liao Z Q, Shi J Y, Mao J. Experimental study and mechanism analysis of primary compression index of MSW (in Chinese). J Hohai Univ, 2007, 35: 326–329

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sun H J, Liang L, Zhao L H, et al. Experimental analysis of primary compression settlement of municipal solid waste landfill (in Chinese). Ind Const, 2009, 39: 84–107

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu J L. Study on compressibility of municipal solid waste and settlement models of landfill (in Chinese). Dissertation for Master Degree. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ke H, Liu J L, Chen Y M, et al. Biodegradation-compression tests on municipal solid waste subjected to different vertical pressures (in Chinese). Chin J Geotech Eng, 2010, 32: 1610–1615

    Google Scholar 

  39. Xie Q, Zhang Y X, Zhang J H. Experimental study on the compressibility of stale waste (in Chinese). J Chongqing Jianzhu Univ, 2003, 25: 18–25

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vilar O M, Carvalhod M. Mechanical properties of municipal solid waste. J Test Eval, 2004, 32: 209–217

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen Y M, Zhan L T, Wei H Y, et al. Aging and compressibility of municipal solid wastes. Waste Manage, 2009, 29: 86–95

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rao S K, Moulton L K, Seals R K. Settlement of refuse landfills. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Geotechnical Practice for Disposal of Solid Waste Materials. Ann Arbor, New York, 1977. 574–598

  43. Beaven R P, Powrie W. Determination of hydrogeological and geotechnical properties of refuse using a large compression cell. In: Proceedings of the Sardinia 95, 5th International Landfill Symposium. Cagliari, 1995

  44. Wall D K, Zeiss C. Municipal landfill biodegradation and settlement. J Environ Eng, 1995, 121: 214–224

    Google Scholar 

  45. Landva A O, Valsangkar A J, Pelkey S G. Lateral earth pressure at rest and compressibility of municipal solid waste. Can Geotech J, 2000, 37: 1157–1165

    Google Scholar 

  46. Olivier F, Gourc, J P, Lopez S.et al. Mechanical behavior of solid waste in a fully instrumented prototype compression box. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium. Cagliari, 2003. 1–12

  47. Hossain M S, Gabr M A, Barlaz M A. Relationship of compressibility parameters to municipal solid waste decomposition. J Geotechnical GeoEnviron Eng, 2003, 129: 1151–1158

    Google Scholar 

  48. Reddy K R, Gangathulasi J, Parakalla N S, et al. Compressibility and shear strength of municipal solid waste under short-term leachate recirculation operations. Waste Manag Res, 2009, 27: 578–587

    Google Scholar 

  49. Reddy K R, Hettiarachchi H, Gangathulasi J, et al. Geotechnical properties of synthetic municipal solid waste. Int J Geotech Eng, 2009, 3: 429–438

    Google Scholar 

  50. Reddy K R, Hettiarachchi H, Parakalla N S, et al. Geotechnical properties of fresh municipal solid waste at Orchard Hills landfill, USA. Waste Manage, 2009, 29: 952–959

    Google Scholar 

  51. Stoltz G, Gourc J P. Influence of compressibility of domestic waste on fluid permeability. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium. Cagliari, 2007. 1–8

  52. Stoltz G, Gourc J P, Oxarango L. Characterisation of the physicomechanical parameters of MSW. Waste Manage, 2010, 30: 1439–1449

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gabr M A, Valero S N. Geotechnical properties of municipal solid waste. Geotech Test J, 1995, 18: 241–251

    Google Scholar 

  54. Machado S L, Carvalho M F, Vilar O M. Constitutive model for municipal solid waste. J Geotechnical GeoEnviron Eng, 2002, 128: 940–951

    Google Scholar 

  55. Xu H, Zhan L, Li H, et al. Time- and stress-dependent model for predicting moisture retention capacity of high-food-waste-content municipal solid waste: based on experimental evidence. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A, 2016, 17: 525–540

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fei X C, Zekkos D, Raskin L. An experimental setup for simultaneous physical, geotechnical, and biochemical characterization of municipal solid waste undergoing biodegradation in the laboratory. Geotech Test J, 2014, 37: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  57. Liu J Y, Xu D M, Zhao Y C. Research on settlement of municipal refuse landfill (in Chinese). Soil Environ Sci, 2002, 11: 111–115

    Google Scholar 

  58. Peng G X. Settlement of municipal solid waste (in Chinese). Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  59. Shi J Y, Lei G H, Ai Y B, et al. Settlement calculation method and experimental study of wastes by considering decomposition of organic matter (in Chinese). Rock Soil Mech, 2006, 27: 1673–1677

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhao Y R. Study on the mechanical and biodegradation settlement properties of municipal solid waste (in Chinese). Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jin H. Decomposition of high organic and moisture content municipal solid waste in bioreactor landfills. Dissertation for Master Degree. Toronto: Ryerson University, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  62. Liao Z Q. Biodegredation experiment study and mechanism analysis of landfill settlement (in Chinese). Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  63. Chen J D, Shi J Y, Hu Y D. One-dimensional compression modified method of settlement of landfills and verification of degradation of organic content in solid waste (in Chinese). Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29: 1797–1801

    Google Scholar 

  64. Bareither C A, Benson C H, Edil T B, et al. Abiotic and biotic compression of municipal solid waste. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2012, 138: 877–888

    Google Scholar 

  65. Chen Y M, Guo R Y, Li Y C, et al. A degradation model for high kitchen waste content municipal solid waste. Waste Manage, 2016, 58: 376–385

    Google Scholar 

  66. Guo R Y. Anaerobic degradation properties of high kitchen waste content municipal solid waste and influences on its engineering behaviors in landfills (in Chinese). Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  67. Tan T, Inoue T, Lee S. Hyperbolic method for consolidation analysis. J Geotechnical Eng, 1991, 117: 1723–1737

    Google Scholar 

  68. Handy R L. First-order rate equations in geotechnical engineering. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 2002, 128: 416–425

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zhan L T, Xu H, Jiang X M, et al. Use of electrical resistivity tomography for detecting the distribution of leachate and gas in a large-scale MSW landfill cell. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2019, 26: 20325–20343

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YuZe Wang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2012CB719802), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51708508, 41402249), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. LY17E080021, LY15E080021), and the Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2019C03107). The authors also want to express their deep thanks to Prof. William Powrie and Dr. Richard Beaven from University of Sonthampton for their constructive comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, H., Qiu, H., Zhu, G. et al. Comparison of settlement behaviors of high-food-waste-content (HFWC) and low-food-waste-content (LFWC) MSWs and assessment of their prediction models. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 62, 2271–2292 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1439-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1439-2

Keywords

Navigation