Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental investigation on acoustic emission characteristics of sandstone rockburst with different moisture contents

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rockburst occurred frequently during deep mining in China. The mechanism of rockburst is very complicated and related to many factors. In order to investigate the influence of moisture contents of rockmass on rockburst, we conducted a series of laboratory rockburst experiments of sandstone under three different moisture contents by the Modified True-Triaxial Apparatus (MTTA), in which the acoustic emission (AE) system was employed to monitor the internal damage of rock mass. A high-speed video camera was utilized to record the detail of rockburst. Based on the experimental results, the AE characteristics, such as AE count, AE energy, and AE frequency, were analyzed. The rockburst process, type, and indensity under different moisture contents were discussed. The research results show that with the increase of moisture contents, rock strength was soften, the elastic and the cumulative damage of the rock were reduced, resulting in a gradual decrease in AE cumulative counts and cumulative energy over the course of rockburst. This study provides an experimental basis and reference for better understanding to the rockburst mechanism and control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. He M C, Xie H P, Peng S P, et al. Study on rock mechanics in deep mining engineering. Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2005, 24: 2803–2813

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li T, Cai M F, Cai M. A review of mining-induced seismicity in China. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 2007, 44: 1149–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin P, Liu X, Hu S, et al. Large deformation analysis of a high steep slope relating to the laxiwa reservoir, China. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2016, 49: 2253–2276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ortlepp W D. High ground displacement velocities associated with rockburst damage. In: Young ed. Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1993. 101–106

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang J A, Park H D. Comprehensive prediction of rockburst based on analysis of strain energy in rocks. Tunnelling Underground Space Tech, 2001, 16: 49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diederichs M S, Kaiser P K, Eberhardt E. Damage initiation and prop-agation in hard rock during tunnelling and the influence of near-face stress rotation. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 2004, 41: 785–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ortlepp W D. RaSiM comes of age–A review of the contribution to the understanding and control of mine rockbursts. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Rockburst and Seismicity in Mines, Perth, Western Australia, 2005, 9–11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tang S, Tong M, Hu J, et al. Characteristics of acoustic emission signals in damp cracking coal rocks. Mining Sci Tech (China), 2010, 20: 143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cook N G W. The failure of rock. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomechanics Abstracts, 1965, 2: 389–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoek E, Brown E T. Underground excavations in rock. The Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, London, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kidybinski A. Bursting liability indices of coal. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomechanics Abstracts, 1981, 18: 295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Joughin N C, Jager A J. Fracture of rock at stope facies in South African gold mines. Trans Inst Min Metall, 1983, 93: 53–66

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaiser P K, Mc Creath D R, Tannant D D. Canadian Rockburst Support Handbook. Sudbury Ontario: MIRARCO/Geomechanics Research Centre, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  14. He M C, Jia X N, Gong W L, et al. Progress in study of rockburst experiments and control countermeasures. In: 12th ISRM Congress. International Society for Rock Mechanics, London, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang K, Zhou H, Pan P Z, et al. Characteristics of strength of rocks under different unloading rates. Rock Soil Mech, 2010, 31: 2072–2078

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gao Y T, Ding L D, Wu S C. Experiment and simulation on rock burst in high in-situ stress tunnel. Rock Soil Mech, 2010, 29: 613–616

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li D J, Jia X N, Miao J L, et al. Analysis of fractal characteristics of fragment from rockburst test of granite. Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2010, 29: 3280–3289

    Google Scholar 

  18. He M C, Zhao F, Zhang Y, et al. Feature evolution of dominant frequency components in acoustic emissions of instantaneous strain-type granitic rockburst simulation tests. Rock Soil Mech, 2015, 36: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li J, Zhang Y B, Liu X X, et al. Experimental study of simulated acoustic emission of granites rock burst under different moisture state. Metal Mine, 2014, 4: 53–59

    Google Scholar 

  20. He M C, Miao J L, Feng J L. Rock burst process of limestone and its acoustic emission characteristics under true-triaxial unloading conditions. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 2010, 47: 286–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li S, Feng X T, Li Z, et al. In situ monitoring of rockburst nucleation and evolution in the deeply buried tunnels of Jinping II hydropower station. Eng Geology, 2012, 137: 85–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Manchao H, Jia X, Coli M, et al. Experimental study of rockbursts in underground quarrying of Carrara marble. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 2012, 52: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Peyras L, Rivard P, Breul P, et al. Characterization of rock discontinuity openings using acoustic wave amplitude-Application to a metamorphic rock mass. Eng Geology, 2015, 193: 402–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu D, Li D, Zhao F, et al. Fragmentation characteristics analysis of sandstone fragments based on impact rockburst test. J Rock Mech Geotechnical Eng, 2014, 6: 251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang C, Liang W, Li Z, et al. Observations of acoustic emission of three salt rocks under uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 2015, 77: 19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang C, Wu A, Lu H, et al. Predicting rockburst tendency based on fuzzy matter–element model. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 2015, 75: 224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ma T H, Tang C A, Tang L X, et al. Rockburst characteristics and microseismic monitoring of deep-buried tunnels for Jinping II Hydropower Station. Tunnelling Underground Space Tech, 2015, 49: 345–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoek E, Bieniawski Z T. Brittle fracture propagation in under compression. Int J Fract Mech, 1965, 1: 137–155

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wong R H C, Chau K T, Wang P. Microcracking and grain size effect in Yuen Long marbles. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 1996, 33: 479–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Park C H, Bobet A. Crack coalescence in specimens with open and closed flaws: A comparison. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 2009, 46: 819–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Janeiro R P, Einstein H H. Experimental study of the cracking behavior of specimens containing inclusions (under uniaxial compression). Int J Fract, 2010, 164: 83–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dai F, Xia K W. Laboratory measurements of the rate dependence of the fracture toughness anisotropy of Barre granite. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 2013, 60: 57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Haeri H, Shahriar K, Marji M F, et al. Experimental and numerical study of crack propagation and coalescence in pre-cracked rock-like disks. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 2014, 67: 20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kranz R L. Crack-crack and crack-pore interactions in stressed granite. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomechanics Abstracts, 1979, 16: 37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lin P, Wong R H C, Tang C A. Experimental study of coalescence mechanisms and failure under uniaxial compression of granite containing multiple holes. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 2015, 77: 313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang S Q, Xu T, He L, et al. Numerical study on failure behavior of brittle rock specimen containing pre-existing combined flaws under different confining pressure. Archives Civil Mechl Eng, 2015, 15: 1085–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Khazaei C, Hazzard J, Chalaturnyk R. Damage quantification of intact rocks using acoustic emission energies recorded during uniaxial compression test and discrete element modeling. Comp Geotechnics, 2015, 67: 94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shiotani T, Ohtsu M, Ikeda K. Detection and evaluation of AE waves due to rock deformation. Construct Build Mater, 2001, 15: 235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin P, Liu H, Zhou W. Experimental study on failure behaviour of deep tunnels under high in-situ stresses. Tunnel Underg Space Tech, 2015, 46: 28–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Amann F, Button E A, Evans K F, et al. Experimental study of the brittle behavior of clay shale in rapid unconfined compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2011, 44: 415–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cox S J D, Meredith P G. Microcrack formation and material softening in rock measured by monitoring acoustic emissions. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomechanics Abstracts, 1993, 30: 11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fujii H, Saito Y, Tanaka M, et al. The AE characteristic in hard rock and soft rock specimens of compression failure using optical type AE sensor (FOD). In: National Conference on Acoustical Emission, Kyoto, 2009, 17: 99–102

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yao Q L, Li X H, He L H, et al. Strength deterioration and acoustic emission characteristics of water-bearing sandstone in uniaxial compressive experiment. J Min Saf Eng, 2013, 30: 717–722

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang Y B, Huang X H, Li S S, et al. Spectral character analysisi of sandstone under saturation condition in rupture procedure. Rock Soil Mech, 2013, 34: 1574–1578

    Google Scholar 

  45. Xu J, Wu H, Lu L F, et al. Experimental study of acoustic emission characters during shearing process of sandstone under different water contents. Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2012, 31: 914–920

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shang X J, Zhang Z Z, Tian Z L, et al. Prediction research of rockburst tendency based on the acoustic emission test. Matal Mine, 2011, 422: 56–59

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gong Y X, He M C, Wang Z H, et al. Research on time-frequency analysis algorithm and instantaneous frequency precursors for acoustic emission data from rock failure experiment. Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2013, 32: 787–799

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shi S L. Application of acoustic emission detection system. J Liaoning Univ (Natural Sci Ed), 1998, 25: 151–155

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gong W L, Wang J, Gong Y X, et al. Thermography analysis of a roadway excavation experiment in 60° inclined stratified rocks. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 2013, 60: 134–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gonzalez R C, Woods R E, Eddins S L. Digital Image Processing. Beijing: Publishing House Electronics Industry. 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to XiaoMing Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, X., Xu, H., Zheng, L. et al. An experimental investigation on acoustic emission characteristics of sandstone rockburst with different moisture contents. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 59, 1549–1558 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-0181-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-0181-8

Keywords

Navigation