Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulation of unsteady cavitating flows around a transient pitching hydrofoil

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to improve the understanding of the influence of multiphase flow on the turbulent closure model, the interplay between vorticity fields and cavity dynamics around a pitching hydrofoil. The effects of pitching rate on the subcavitating and cavitating response of the pitching hydrofoil are also investigated. In particular, we focus on the interactions between cavity inception, growth, and shedding and the vortex flow structures, and their impacts on the hydrofoil performance. The calculations are 2-D and performed by solving the incompressible, multiphase Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (URANS) equations via the commercial CFD code CFX. The k-ω SST (Shear Stress Transport) turbulence model is used along with the transport equation-based cavitation models. The density correction function is considered to reduce the eddy viscosity according to the computed local fluid mixture density. The calculation results are validated with experiments conducted by Ducoin et al. (see Computational and experimental investigation of flow over a transient pitching hydrofoil, Eur J Mech/B Fluids, 2009, 28: 728–743 and An experimental analysis of fluid structure interaction of a flexible hydrofoil in various flow regimes including cavitating flow, Eur J Mech B/fluids, 2012, 36: 63–74). Results are shown for a NACA66 hydrofoil subject to slow (quasi static, \(\dot \alpha = {{6^ \circ } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{6^ \circ } s}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} s}\), \(\dot \alpha ^ * = 0.18\)) and fast (dynamic, \(\dot \alpha = {{63^ \circ } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{63^ \circ } s}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} s}\), \(\dot \alpha ^ * = 1.89\)) pitching motions from α = 0° to α = 15°. Both subcavitaing (σ=8.0) and cavitating (σ=3.0) flows are considered. For subcavitating flow (σ=8.0), low frequency fluctuations have been observed when the leading edge vortex shedding occurs during stall, and delay of stall is observed with increasing pitching velocity. For cavitating flow (σ=3.0), small leading edge cavities are observed with the slow pitching case, which significantly modified the vortex dynamics at high angles of attack, leading to high frequency fluctuations of the hydrodynamic coefficients and different stall behaviors compared to the subcavitating flow at the same pitching rate. On the other hand, for the fast pitching case at σ=3.0, large-scale sheet/cloud cavitation is observed, the cavity behavior is unsteady and has a strong impact on the hydrodynamic response, which leads to high amplitude fluctuations of the hydrodynamic coefficients, as well as significant changes in the stall and post-stall behavior. The numerical results also show that the local density modification helps to reduce turbulent eddy viscosity in the cavitating region, which significantly modifies the cavity lengths and shedding frequencies, particularly for the fast pitching case. In general, compared with the experimental visualizations, the numerical results with local density correction have been found to agree well with experimental measurements and observations for both slow and fast transient pitching cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arndt R E A. Cavitation in fluid machinery and hydraulic structure. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 1981, 13: 273–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Luo X W, Ji B, Peng X X, et al. Numerical simulation of cavity shedding from a three-dimensional twisted hydrofoil and induced pressure fluctuation by large-eddy simulation. J Fluids Eng, 2012, 134(4): 041202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ji B, Luo X W, Peng X X, et al. Numerical analysis of cavitation evolution and excited pressure fluctuation around a propeller in non-uniform wake. Int J Multiphase Flow, 2012, 43: 13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu Z, Young Y L. Performance-based design and analysis of flexible composite propulsors. J Fluids Struct, 2011, 27: 1310–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McCroskey W J. Unsteady airfoils. Ann Rev Fluid Mech, 1982, 14: 285–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carr L W. Progress in analysis and prediction of dynamic stall. J Aircr, 1988, 25: 6–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carr L W, McCroskey W J. A review of recent advances in computation and experimental analysis of dynamic stall. International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics on Fluid Dynamics at High Angle of Attack, Tokyo, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ohmi K, Coutanceau M, Loc T P, et al. Vortex formation around an oscillating and translating airfoil at large incidences. J Fluid Mech, 1990, 211: 37–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oshima Y, Natsume A. Flow field around an oscillating foil. 2nd Int Symp on Flow Visualization, Bochum, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  10. Freymuth P. Propulsive vortical signatures of plunging and pitching airfoils, AIAA J, 1988, 26: 881–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koochesfahani M M. Vortical patterns in the wake of an oscillating airfoil, AIAA J, 1989, 27: 1200–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lorber P F, Carta F O. Airfoil dynamic stall at constant pitch rate and high Reynolds number. J Aircr, 1988, 25: 548–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee T, Gerontakos P. Investigate of flow over an oscillating airfoil. J Fluid Mech, 2004, 512: 313–341

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Triantafyllou G S, Triantafyllou M S, Grosenbaugh M A. Optimal thrust development in oscillating foils with application to fish propulsion. J Fluids Struct, 1993, 7: 205–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jumper E J, Schreck S J, Dimnick R L. Lift-curve characteristics for an airfoil pitching at constant rate. J Aircr, 1987, 24: 680–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ducoin A, Astolfi J A, Deniset F, et al. Computational and experimental investigation of flow over a transient pitching hydrofoil. Eur J Mech/B Fluids Elsevier, 2009, 28: 728–743

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Joseph D D. Cavitation in a flowing liquid. Phys Rev E, 1995, 51: 1649–1650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Knapp R T, Daily J W, Hammitt F G. Cavitation, New York: McGraw Hill, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  19. Callenaere M, Franc J P, Michel J M, et al. The cavitation instability induced by the development of a re-entrant jet. J Fluid Mech, 2001, 444: 223–256

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang G, Senocak I, Shyy W, et al. Dynamics of attached turbulent cavitating flows. Prog Aero Sci, 2001, 37: 551–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang B, Wang G. Experimental and numerical investigation of unsteady cavitating flows through a 2D hydrofoil. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 1801–1812

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Stutz B, Legoupil S. X-ray measurements within unsteady cavitations. Exp Fluids, 2003, 35: 130–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Foeth E J. The structure of three-dimensional sheet cavitation. Ph.D. Thesis. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kunz R F, Boger D A, Stinebring D R, et al. A preconditioned Navier-stokes method for two phase flows with application to cavitation prediction. Comput Fluids, Elsevier, 2000, 29: 849–875

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Singhal A K, Athavale M M, Li H, et al. Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. J Fluids Eng, 2002, 124: 617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Coutier-Delgosha O, Fortes-Patella R, Reboud J L. Evaluation of the turbulence model influence on the numerical simulations of unsteady cavitations. ASME J Fluids Eng, 2003, 125(1): 38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Senocak I, Shyy W. A pressure-based method for turbulent cavitating flow computations. J Comput Phys, 2002, 176: 363–383

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim S, Brewton S. A multiphase approach to turbulent cavitating flows. Proceedings of 27th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  29. Seo J H, Lele S K. Numerical investigation of cloud cavitation and cavitation noise on a hydrofoil section. Proceedings of 7th Int Symp on Cavitation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2009

  30. Kubota A, Kato H, Yamaguchi H, et al. Unsteady structure measurement of cloud cavitation on a foil section using conditional sampling technique. J Fluids Eng, 1989, 111(2): 204–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang B, Wang G Y, Zhao Y, et al. Physical and numerical investigation on transient cavitating flows. Sci China Tech Sci, 2013, 56(9): 2207–2218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ji B, Luo X W, Peng X X, et al. Three-dimensional large eddy simulation and vorticity analysis of unsteady cavitating flow around a twisted hydrofoil. J Hydrodyn, 2013, 25(4): 510–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu J, Wang G, Shyy W. Time-dependent turbulent cavitating flow computations with interfacial transport and filter based models. Int J Numer MethFluids, 2005, 49: 739–761

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang G, Ostoja-Starzewski M. Large eddy simulation of a sheet/ cloud cavitation on a NACA0015 hydrofoil. Appl Math Model, 2007, 31(3): 417–447

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Shen Y T, Peterson F B. Unsteady cavitation on an oscillating hydrofoil. Proceedings of 12th Symp on Naval Hydrodynamics, Washington D C, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shen Y T, Peterson F B. The influence of hydrofoil oscillation on boundary layer transition and cavitation noise. Proceedings of 13th Symp on Naval Hydrodynamics, Tokyo, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  37. Franc J P, Michel J M. Unsteady attached cavitation on an oscillating hydrofoil. J Fluid Mech, 1988, 193: 171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hart D P, Brennen C E, Acosta A J. Observations of cavitation on a three-dimensional oscillating hydrofoil. Proc ASME Conf on Cavitation and Multiphase, New York, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kato K, Dan H, Matsudaira Y. Lock-in phenomenon of pitching hydrofoil with cavitation breakdown. Int J Ser B Fluids Therm Eng, 2006, 49: 797–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Uchiyama T. Numerical study on bubbly flow around a hydrofoil in pitching and heaving motions. Proc Institute Mech Eng, 2003, 217: 811–816

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ducoin A, Astolfi J A, Sigrist J -F. An experimental analysis of fluid structure interaction of a flexible hydrofoil in various flow regimes including cavitating flow. Eur J Mech B/Fluids, 2012, 36: 63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Merkle C L, Feng J, Buelow P E O. Computational modeling of sheet cavitations. Proceedings of Third International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  43. Huang B, Ducoin A, Young Y L. Evaluation of cavitation models for prediction of transient cavitating flows around a pitching hydrofoil. Proceedings of 8th International Symposium on Cavitation, Singapore, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  44. Menter F R. Improved two-equation k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. NASA Tech Memorandu, 1992, 34: 103975

    Google Scholar 

  45. Huang B, Young Y L, Wang G, et al. Combined experimental and computational investigation of unsteady structure of sheet/cloud cavitation. J Fluids Eng, 2013, 135: 071301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ji B, Luo X W, Wu Y L, et al. Numerical analysis of unsteady cavitating turbulent flow and shedding horse-shoe vortex structure around a twisted hydrofoil. Int J Multiphase Flow, 2013, 51: 33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Huang B, Wang G Y. Evaluation of a filter-based model for computations of cavitating flows. Chin Phys Lett, 2011, 28(2): 026401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ji B, Luo X W, Wu Y L. Partially-Averaged Navier-Stokes method with modified k-epsilon model for cavitating flow around a marine propeller in a non-uniform wake. Int J Heat Mass Tran, 2012, 55: 6582–6588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Huang B, Wang G Y. Partial averaged Navier-Stokes method for time-dependent turbulent cavitating flows. J Hydrodyn, 2011, 23(1): 26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biao Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, B., Wu, Q. & Wang, G. Numerical simulation of unsteady cavitating flows around a transient pitching hydrofoil. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 57, 101–116 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5423-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5423-y

Keywords

Navigation