Skip to main content
Log in

Acoustic emission characterization methods of damage modes identification on carbon fiber twill weave laminate

  • Progress of Projects Supported by NSFC
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to get a deep understanding of composite failure mechanisms, the new advanced signal processing methodologies are established for the analysis of the large number of acoustic emission (AE) data obtained from the quasi-static tension test of carbon fiber twill weave composite. For this purpose, AE signals have been collected and post-processed for tension test, and are analyzed with three signal processing methods: Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT) and modified energy entropy algorithm. AE signals can be decomposed into a set of Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMF) components, results from this study reveal that the peak frequency of IMF components based on Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) corresponds to different damage mechanisms of composite. HHT of AE signals can clearly express the frequency distribution of IMF component in time-scale in different damage stages, and can calculate accurate instantaneous frequency for damage modes recognition. The energy entropy based on EMD is introduced to act as a new relevant descriptor of composite damage modes in order to improve the characterization and the discrimination of the damage mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hugueta S, Godina N, Gaertnera R, et al. Use of acoustic emission to identify damage modes in glass fibre reinforced polyester. Compos Sci Technol, 2002, 62(10): 1433–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berthelot J M, Rhazi J. Acoustic emission in carbon fibre composites. Compos Sci Technol, 1990, 37(4): 411–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Godina N, Hugueta S, Gaertnera R, et al. Clustering of acoustic emission signals collected during tensile tests on unidirectional glass/polyester composite using supervised and unsupervised classifiers. NDT&E Int, 2004, 37(4): 253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morscher G N, Martinez-Fernandez J, Purdy M J. Determination of interfacial properties using a single-fiber microcomposite test. J Am Ceram Soc, 1996, 79(4): 1083–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oskouei A R, Ahmadi M, Hajikhani M. Wavelet-based acoustic emission characterization of damage mechanisms in composite materials under mode I delamination at different interfaces. Express Polym Lett, 2009, 3(12): 804–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ni Q Q, Iwamoto M. Wavelet transform of acoustic emission signals in failure of model composites. Eng Fract Mech, 2002, 69(6): 717–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sung D U, Kim C G, Hong C S. Monitoring of impact damages in composite laminates using wavelet transform. Composites, Part B, Eng, 2002, 33(1): 35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Loutas T H, Kostopoulos V, Ramirez-Jimenez C, et al. Damage evolution in center-holed glass-polyester composites under quasi-static loading using time-frequency analysis of acoustic emission monitored waveforms. Compos Sci Technol, 2006, 66(10): 1366–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Surgeon M, Wevers M. Modal analysis of acoustic emission signals from CFRP laminates. NDT&E Int, 1999, 32(6): 311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gorman M R, Ziola S M. Plate waves produced by transverse matrix cracking. Ultrasonics, 1991, 29(3): 245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Prosser W H, Jackson K E, Kellas S, et al. Advanced,waveform based acoustic emission detection of matrix cracking in composites. Mater Eval,1995, 53(9): 1052–1058

    Google Scholar 

  12. deGroot P J, Wijnen P A M. Real-time frequency determination of acoustic emission for different fracture mechanisms in carbon/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol, 1995, 55(4): 405–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramirez-Jimenez C R, Papadakis N, Reynolds N, et al. Identification of failure modes in glass/polypropylene composites by means of the primary frequency content of the acoustic emission event. Compos Sci Technol, 2004, 64(12): 1819–1827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gutkin R, Green C J, Vangrattanachai S, et al. On acoustic emission for failure investigation in CFRP:Pattern recognition and peak frequency analyses. Mech Syst Signal Proc, 2011, 25(4): 1393–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arumugam V, Sajith S, JosephStanley A. Acoustic emission characterization of failure modes in GFRP laminates under mode I delamination. J Nondestruct Eval, 2011, 30(3): 213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moevus M, Godin N, RMili M, et al. Analysis of damage mechanisms and associated acoustic emission in two SiCf/[Si-B-C] composites exhibiting different tensile behaviours. Part II. Unsupervised acoustic emission data clustering. Compos Sci Technol, 2008, 68(6): 1258–1265

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oliveira R de, Marques A T. Health monitoring of FRP using acoustic emission and artificial neural networks. Comput Struct, 2008, 86(3-5): 367–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Godin N, Huguet S, Gaeertner R. Integration of the kohonens self-organizing map and k-means algorithm for the segmentation of the AE data collected during tensile tests on cross-ply composites. NDT&E Int, 2005, 38(4): 299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pashmforoush F, Fotouhi M, Ahmadi M. Damage characterization of glass/epoxy composite under three-point bending test using acoustic emission technique. J Mater Eng Perform, 2011, 21(7):1380–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Loutas T H, Kostopoulos V, Ramirez-Jimenez C, et al. Damage evolution in center-holed glass/polyester composites under quasi-static loading using time/frequency analysis of acoustic emission monitored waveforms. Compos Sci Technol, 2006, 66(10): 1366–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marec A, Thomas J H, Guerjouma R El. Damage characterization of polymer-based composite materials: multivariable analysis and wavelet transform for clustering acoustic emission data. Mech Syst Signal Proc, 2008,22 (6): 1441–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Norden E, Huang M C, Long S R, et al. A confidence limit for the empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectrum analysis. Proc R Soc Lond A, 2003, 459(4): 2317-345

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dongyang D, Yingkai Z. Application of ensemble empirical mode decomposition in failure analysis of rotating machinery. Trans CSAE, 2010, 26(2): 190–196

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to WenQin Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, W., Zhou, J. Acoustic emission characterization methods of damage modes identification on carbon fiber twill weave laminate. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 56, 2228–2237 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5296-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5296-0

Keywords

Navigation