Skip to main content
Log in

Fracture analysis of rock mass based on 3-D nonlinear Finite Element Method

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional fracture analysis is based on fracture mechanics and damage mechanics. They focus on the propagation of the fracture. However, their propagation criterions are not easily applied in practice and the current analysis is limited in planar problem. This paper presents a new theory that the occurrence of the unbalanced force (derived from the Deformation Reinforcement Theory) could be the criterion of the initiation of the fracture, and the distribution area and propagation of the unbalanced force could be the indication of the fracture propagation direction. By aggregate analysis with Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) criterion, the unbalanced force actually is the opposite external load that is the SIF difference incurred between the external loads and permitted by the structure. Numerical simulation and physical experiments on pre-fracture cuboid rock specimens proved that the occurrence of the unbalanced force could be the initiation of the fracture. Mesh size dependence was also considered by analysis of different mesh size finite element gravity dam models. Furthermore, the theory was applied to the feasibility analysis of the Baihetan arch dam together with physical experiments in order to evaluate the fracture propagation of dam heel. The results show that it is an effective way to use unbalanced force to analyze the fracture initiation and propagation when performing 3-dimensional nonlinear FEM calculation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang W. Macro-micro Fracture Mechanics (in Chinese). Beijing: National Industry Press, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  2. Geersa M G D, De Borst R, Peerlings R H J. Damage and crack modeling in single-edge and double-edge notched concrete beams. Eng Fract Mech, 2000, 65: 247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang C A. Numerical tests of progressive failure in brittle materials (in Chinese). Mech Eng, 1999, 21(2): 21–24

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Y Q, Zheng X P, Yao Z H. Explanation of strain softening and numerical modeling to the failure process of laminated composite material (in Chinese). Chin J Comput Phys, 2003, 20(1): 14–20

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dumstorffz P, Meschke G. Crack propagation criteria in the framework of X-FEM-based structural analyses. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech, 2007, 31: 239–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fang X J, Jin F, Wang J T. Simulation of mixed-mode fracture of concrete using extended finite element method (in Chinese). Eng Mech, 2007, 24(Supp I): 46–52

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kou X D, Zhou W Y. The application of element-free method to approximate calculation of arch dam crack propagation (in Chinese). J Hydraul Eng, 2000, 10: 28–35

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang Y S, Zhou W Y, Hu Y J. Crack propagation tracing by using 3-D element-free Galerkin method(in Chinese). J Hydraul Eng, 2006, 37(1): 63–69

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xiao H T, Yue Z Q. Boundary element analysis of 3D crack problems in layered materials (in Chinese). Chin J Comput Mech, 2003, 20(6): 721–724

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hou Y L, Zhou Y D, Zhang C H. Tensile shear mixed mode fracture analysis of concrete rock material by distinct element method (in Chinese). Chin J Comput Mech, 2007, 24(6): 773–778, 784

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang S L, Ge X R. Application of manifold method in simulating crack propagation (in Chinese). Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 1997, 16(5): 319–332

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Q, Zhang H, Wu R Z. Lattice model simulation of fracture in disordered brittle materials (in Chinese). Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2000, 19(Supp): 941–945

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hillerborg A, Modéer M, Peterson P E. Analysis of crack propagation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cem Concr Res, 1976, 6: 773–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bazant Z P. Crack band model for fracture of geomaterial. In: Eisenstein Z, ed. Proc 4th Int Conf on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Edmonton: Univ of Alberta, 1982, 3: 1137–1152

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blackburn W S. A remeshing algorithm for three-dimensional crack growth and intersection with surfaces or cracks in non-coplanar planes. Eng Anal Bound Elem, 2000, 24: 343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bouchard P O, Bay F, Chastel Y. Numerical modelling of crack propagation: automatic remeshing and comparison of different criteria. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng, 2003, 192: 3887–3908

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Vroonhovena J C W, De Borst R. Combination of fracture and damage mechanics for numerical failure analysis. Int J Solids Struct, 1999, 36: 1169–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Erdogan F, Sih G C. On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. ASME J Basic Eng, 1963, 85(4): 519–527

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hussain M A, Pu S L, Underwood J. Strain energy release rate for a crack under combined mode I and mode II. In: Paris P C, Irwin G R, eds. Fracture Analysis, ASTM STP 560, 2–28, Philadelphia, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  20. Palaniswamy K, Knauss W G. On the problem of crack extension in brittle solids under general loading. In: Nemat-Nasser S, ed. Mechanics Today, vol 4. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1978. 87–148

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sih G C. Strain energy density factor applied to mixed mode crack problems. Int J Fract, 1974, 10(3): 305–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cotterell B, Rice J R. Slightly curved or kinked cracks. Int J Fract, 1980, 16(2): 155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Theocaris P S, Andrianopoulos N P. The Mises elastic-plastic boundary as the core region in fracture criteria. Eng Fract Mech, 1982, 16(3): 425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang Q, Liu Y R, Chen Y R, et al. Deformation reinforcement theory and global stability and reinforcement of high arch dams. Chin J Rock Mech Eng (in Chinese), 2008, 27(6): 1121–1136

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang Q, Chen X, Zhou W Y, et al. On unbalanced forces in 3D elastoplastic finite element analysis(in Chinese). Chin J Geotech Eng, 2004, 26(3): 323–326

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin P. Brittle failure behaviour of medium contaiming flaws and pore (in Chinese). Doctoral Thesis. Shengyang: The Northeastern University, 2002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YaoRu Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Chang, Q., Yang, Q. et al. Fracture analysis of rock mass based on 3-D nonlinear Finite Element Method. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 54, 556–564 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4278-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4278-8

Keywords

Navigation