Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thermodynamic watershed hydrological model: Constitutive relationship

  • Published:
Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The representative elementary watershed (REW) approach proposed by Reggiani et al. was the first attempt to develop scale adaptable equations applicable directly at the macro scale. Tian et al. extended the initial definition of REW for simulating the energy related processes, and re-organized the deriving procedure of balance equations so that additional sub-regions and substances could be easily incorporated. The resultant ordinary differential equation set can simulate various hydrological processes in a physically reasonable way. However, constitutive and geometric relationships have not been developed for Tian et al.’s equation set, which are necessary for the thermodynamic watershed hydrological model to apply in hydrological modeling practice. In this work, the constitutive equations for mass exchange terms and momentum exchange terms were developed as well as geometric relationships. The closed ordinary differential equation set with nine equations was finally obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang D W, Xia J. Advances in China PUB: The Complexity of Water Issues and Uncertainty. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freeze R A, Harlan R L. Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologic response model. J Hydrol, 1969, 9(3): 237–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abbott M B, Bathurst J C, Cunge J. An introduction to the European hydrological system—Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, ’sHE’. 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. J Hydrol, 1986, 87(1–2): 45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beven K. Changing ideas in hydrology’the case of physically-based models. J Hydrol, 1989, 105(1–2): 157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beven K. Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modeling system. Hydrol Process, 2002, 16(2): 189–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beven K. J. A discussion of distributed modeling. In: Refsgaard J C, Kluwer M B A, eds. Distributed Hydrological Modeling, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1996. 255–278

  7. Refsgaard J C, Storm B, Abbott M B. Comment on “A discussion of distributed hydrological modeling” by Beven K J. In: Refsgaard J C, Kluwer M B A, eds. Distributed Hydrological Modelling, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1996. 279–287

  8. Tian F Q, Hu H P, Lei Z D, et al. Extension of the representative elementary watershed approach for cold regions via explicit treatment of energy related processes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2006, 10: 619–644

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duffy C J. A two-state integral-balance model for soil moisture and groundwater dynamics in complex terrain. Water Resour Res, 1996, 32: 2421–2434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ewen J. “Blueprint” for the UP modeling system for large-scale hydrology. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 1997, 1: 55–69

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson J S, Sivapalan M. Catchment-scale runoff generation model by aggregation and similarity analyses. Hydrol Process, 1995, 9(5–6): 555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reggiani P, Sivapalan M, Hassanizadeh S M. Unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: Balance equations for mass, momentum, energy and entropy, and the second law of thermodynamics. Adv Water Resour, 1998, 22(4): 367–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tian F Q. Study on thermodynamic watershed hydrological model (THModel). Ph.D. Thesis. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee H, Zehe E, Sivapalan M. Predictions of rainfall-runoff response and soil moisture dynamics in a micrsoscale catchment using the CREW model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2007, 11: 819–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reggiani P, Hassanizadeh S. M, Sivapalan M. Unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: constitutive relationships. Adv Water Resour, 1999, 23(1): 15–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reggiani P, Rientjes T H M. Flux parameterization in the representative elementary watershed approach: Application to a natural basin. Water Resour Res. 2005, 41(4): 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lei Z D, Yang S X, Xie S C. Soil Water Dynamics. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers A D. The development of a simple infiltration capacity equation for spatially variable soils. B.E (Honours) Thesis. The University of Western Australia, 1992

  19. Eagleson P S. Climate, soil, and vegetation. III. A simplified model of soil moisture movement in the liquid phase. Water Resour Res, 1978, 14(5): 722–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brooks R H, Corey A T. Hydraulic properties of porous media. Colorado State University—Hydrology Papers, 1964, 3: 27

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haverkamp R, Parlange J Y. Predicting the water-retention curve from particle-size distribution: 1. Sandy soils without organic matter. Soil Sci, 1986, 142(6): 325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mualem Y. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res, 1976, 12: 513–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Genuchten M Th. Closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Amer J, 1980, 44(5): 892–898

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reggiani P, Sivapalan M, Hassanizadeh S M. Conservation equations governing hillslope responses: Exploring the physical basis of water balance. Water Resour Res, 2000, 36(7): 1845–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao R J. The Xin’anjiang model applied in China. J Hydrol, 1992, 135: 371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rui X F. Principles of Hydrology. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2004. 143–152

    Google Scholar 

  27. Merriam R A. A note on the interception loss equation. J Geophys Res, 1960, 65: 3850–3851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yi C X. A new formula to calculate the canopy interception. J Soil Erosion Water Conserv, 1996, 2(2): 47–49

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zehe E, Sivapalan M. Towards a new generation of hydrological process models for the meso-scale: An introduction. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2007, 11: 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    FuQiang Tian, HePing Hu & ZhiDong Lei

Authors
  1. FuQiang Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. HePing Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. ZhiDong Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to FuQiang Tian.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50509013)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tian, F., Hu, H. & Lei, Z. Thermodynamic watershed hydrological model: Constitutive relationship. Sci. China Ser. E-Technol. Sci. 51, 1353–1369 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-008-0147-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-008-0147-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation