Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrodynamic regime as a major control on localization of uranium mineralization in sedimentary basins

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uranium deposits in sedimentary basins can be formed at various depths, from near surface to the basement. While many factors may have played a role in controlling the location of mineralization, examination of various examples in the world, coupled with numerical modeling of fluid flow, indicates that the hydrodynamic regime of a basin may have exerted a major control on the localization of uranium deposits. If a basin is strongly overpressured, due to rapid sedimentation, abundance of low-permeability sediments or generation of hydrocarbons, fluid flow is dominantly upward and uranium mineralization is likely limited at shallow depths. If a basin is moderately overpressured, upward moving fluids carrying reducing agents may meet downward moving, oxidizing, uranium-bearing fluids in the middle of the basin, forming uranium deposits at moderate depths. If a basin is weakly or not overpressured, either due to slow sedimentation or dominance of high-permeability lithologies, minor topographic disturbance or density variation may drive oxidizing fluids to the bottom of the basin, leaching uranium either from the basin or the basement, forming unconformity-type uranium deposits. It is therefore important to analyze the hydrodynamic regime of a basin in order to predict the most likely type and location of uranium deposits in the basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandre P, Kyser K, Polito P, et al. 2005. Alteration mineralogy and stable isotope geochemistry of Paleoproterozoic basement-hosted unconformity-type uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin, Canada. Econ Geol, 100: 1547–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bethke C M, Lee M K, Quinodoz H, et al. 1993. Basin modeling with Basin2, a Guide to using Basin2, B2plot, B2video, and B2view. Urbana: University of Illinois. 225

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethke C M. 1985. A numerical model of compaction-driven groundwater flow and heat transfer and its application to paleohydrology of intracratonic sedimentary basins. J Geophys Res, 90: 6817–6828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bykadorov V A, Bush V A, Fedorenko O A, et al. 2003. Ordovician-Permian palaeogeography of Central Eurasia: Development of Palaeozoic petroleum-bearing basins. J Petrl Geol, 26: 325–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi G, Bosman S, Card C. 2011. Fluid flow models related to uranium mineralization in the Athabasca basin: A review and new insights. Saskatchewan Geological Survey Open House, Abstract Volume. 4

  • Chi G, Bosman S, Card C. 2013. Numerical modeling of fluid pressure regime in the Athabasca basin and implications for fluid flow models related to the unconformity-type uranium mineralization. J Geochem Explor, 125: 8–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi G, Savard M M. 1998. Basinal fluid flow models related to Zn-Pb mineralization in the southern margin of the Maritimes Basin, eastern Canada. Econ Geol, 93: 896–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui T, Yang J, Samson I M. 2012. Tectonic deformation and fluid flow: Implications for the formation of unconformity-related uranium deposits. Econ Geol, 107: 147–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuney M. 2010. Evolution of uranium fractionation processes through time: Driving the secular variation of uranium deposit types. Econ Geol, 105: 553–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlkamp F J. 2009. Typology of Uranium Deposits, Uranium Deposits of the World-Part I. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. 1–24

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finch W I. 1996. Uranium provinces of North America-their definition, distribution, and models. U.S. Geol Survey Bull, 2141: 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R P. 1970. Similarities, differences, and some genetic problems of the Wyoming and Colorado Plateau types of uranium deposits in sandstone. Econ Geol, 65: 778–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fyodorov G V. 1999. Uranium deposits of the Inkay-Mynkuduk ore field, Kazakhstan. In: Developments in Uranium Resources, Production, Demand and the Environment. Proceedings of International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting. Vienna. IAEA-TECDOC-1425, 95–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison W J, Summa L L. 1991. Paleohydrogeology of the Gulf of Mexico basin. Am J Sci, 291: 109–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht L, Cuney M. 2000. Hydrothermal alteration of monazite in the Precambrian basement of the Athabasca Basin: Implications for the genesis of unconformity related deposits. Mineral Deposit, 35: 791–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaireth S, McKay A, Lambert I. 2008. Association of large sandstone uranium deposits with hydrocarbons. AUSGEO News, 89: 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson C W, Thomas D J, Gandhi S S, et al. 2007. Unconformity-associated uranium deposits of the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan and Alberta. In: Jefferson C W, Delaney G, eds. EXTECH IV: Geology and Uranium Exploration Technology of the Proterozoic Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan and Alberta. Geol Surv Can Bull, 588: 23–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyser T K, Cuney M. 2008a. Introduction. In: Cuney M, Kyser T K, eds. Recent and Not-so-recent Developments in Uranium Deposits and Implications for Exploration. Mineral Ass Canada Short Course Series, 39: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyser T K, Cuney M. 2008b. Unconformity-related uranium deposits. In: Cuney M, Kyser T K, eds. Recent and Not-so-recent Developments in Uranium Deposits and Implications for Exploration. Mineral Ass Canada Short Course Series, 39: 161–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyser T K, Cuney M. 2008c. Sandstone-hosted uranium deposits. In: Cuney M, Kyser T K, eds. Recent and Not-so-recent Developments in Uranium Deposits and Implications for Exploration. Mineral Ass Canada Short Course Series, 39: 221–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyser T K, Hiatt E, Renac C, et al. 2000. Diagenetic fluids in Paleo- and Meso-Proterozoic sedimentary basins and their implications for long protracted fluid histories. In: Kyser T K, ed. Fluid and Basin Evolution. Mineral Ass Canada Short Course, 28: 225–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyser T K. 2007. Fluids, basin analysis, and mineral deposits. Geofluids, 7: 238–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling M. 2007. Mineralogical and geochemical studies of sandstone-type uranium mineral deposits in the Ordos Basin (in Chinese). Ph.D. Thesis. Hefei: China University of Science and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov V V, Petrov N N. 1998. Age of exogene uranium deposits in south and south-east Kazakhstan according to the lead-isotope study. Geol Kazakhstan, 2: 63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash J T, Granger H C, Adams S S. 1981. Geology and concepts of genesis of important types of uranium deposits. Econom Geol, 75: 63–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Northrop H R, Goldhaber M B. 1990. Genesis of the tabular-type vanadium-uranium deposits of the Henry Basin, Utah. Econ Geol, 85: 215–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel M, Poty B, Sheppard S M F. 1980. Contributions to some Saskatchewan uranium deposits mainly from fluid inclusion and isotopic data. In: Fergusom S, Goleby A, eds. Uranium in the Pin Creek Geosyncline. Int Atomic Energy Agency, 639–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffensperger J P, Garven G. 1995a. The formation of unconformity type uranium ore deposits: 1. Coupled groundwater flow and heat transport modeling. Am J Sci, 295: 581–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffensperger J P, Garven G. 1995b. The formation of unconformity type uranium ore deposits: 2. Coupled hydrochemical modeling. Am J Sci, 295: 639–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Z, Zhang S, Gao S. et al. 2006. Relationship between thermal evolution and various energy and mineral resources in the Dongsheng area, Yimeng uplift (in Chinese). Oil Gas Geol, 27: 187–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds R L, Goldhaber M B. 1983. Iron disulfide minerals and the genesis of roll-type uranium deposits. Econ Geol, 78: 105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford R F. 1992. A new model for tabular-type uranium deposits. Econ Geol, 87: 2041–2055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibson R H, Robert F, Poulsen K H. 1988. High-angle reverse faults, fluid-pressure cycling, and mesothermal gold-quartz deposits. Geology, 16: 551–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spirakis C S. 1996. The roles of organic matter in the formation of uranium deposits in sedimentary rocks. Ore Geol Rev, 11: 53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y, Wang Y. 2004. Comparison of enrichment patterns of various energy and mineral resources in the Ordos Basin (in Chinese). Oil Gas Geol, 25: 385–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia Y, Lin J, Liu H. 2003. Geochronological studies of sandstone-type uranium deposits in major uranium-producing basins in northern China (in Chinese). Uranium Geol, 19: 129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue C, Chi G, Xue W. 2011. Effects of hydrocarbon generation on fluid flow in the Ordos Basin and relationship with uranium mineralization. Geosci Front, 2: 439–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue C, Chi G, Xue W. 2010. Interaction of two fluid systems in the formation of sandstone-hosted uranium deposits in the Ordos Basin: Geochemical evidence and hydrodynamic modeling. J Geochem Explor, 106: 226–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to GuoXiang Chi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chi, G., Xue, C. Hydrodynamic regime as a major control on localization of uranium mineralization in sedimentary basins. Sci. China Earth Sci. 57, 2928–2933 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4976-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4976-3

Keywords

Navigation