Skip to main content
Log in

Rupture behavior and deformation localization of the Kunlunshan earthquake (M w 7.8) and their tectonic implications

  • Published:
Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earthquake surface rupture is the result of transformation from crustal elastic strain accumulation to permanent tectonic deformation. The surface rupture zone produced by the 2001 Kunlunshan earthquake (M w 7.8) on the Kusaihu segment of the Kunlun fault extends over 426 km. It consists of three relatively independent surface rupture sections: the western strike-slip section, the middle transtensional section and the eastern strike-slip section. Hence this implies that the Kunlunshan earthquake is composed of three earthquake rupturing events, i.e. the M w =6.8, M w =6.2 and M w ⩽=7.8 events, respectively. The M w =7.8 earthquake, along the eastern section, is the main shock of the Kunlunshan earthquake, further decomposed into four rupturing subevents. Field measurements indicate that the width of a single surface break on different sections ranges from several meters to 15 m, with a maximum value of less than 30 m. The width of the surface rupture zone that consists of en echelon breaks depends on its geometric structures, especially the stepover width of the secondary surface rupture zones in en echelon, displaying a basic feature of deformation localization. Consistency between the Quaternary geologic slip rate, the GPS-monitored strain rate and the localization of the surface ruptures of the 2001 Kunlunshan earthquake may indicate that the tectonic deformation between the Bayan Har block and Qilian-Qaidam block in the northern Tibetan Plateau is characterized by strike-slip faulting along the limited width of the Kunlun fault, while the blocks themselves on both sides of the Kunlun fault are characterized by block motion. The localization of earthquake surface rupture zone is of great significance to determine the width of the fault-surface-rupture hazard zone, along which direct destruction will be caused by co-seismic surface rupturing along a strike-slip fault, that should be considered before the major engineering project, residental buildings and life line construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scholz C H. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting. New York: Cambridge Univ Press, 1990. 1–389

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sibson R H. Fault rocks and fault mechanism. J Geol Soc London, 1977, 133: 191–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yeats R S, Sieh K, Allen C R. The Geology of Earthquakes. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, 1997. 1–568

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deng Q D, Yu G H, Ye W H. Relationship between earthquake magnitude and parameters of surface ruptures associated with historical earthquake. In: Editorial Board of “Research on Active Fault”, ed. Research on Active Fault (2) (in Chinese). Beijing: Seismological Press, 1992. 247–264

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wells D L, Coppersmith S. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 1994, 84(4): 974–1002

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang H K, Zheng J C, Wu Q, et al. Statistical features of aftershock distribution size for moderate and large earthquakes in China mainland. Acta Seismol Sin, 2007, 29(2): 151–164

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu X W, Chen W, Chen G. H, et al. Surface rupture of the Kunlun Earthquake (Ms 8.1), northern Tibetan Plateau, China. Seismol Res Lett, 2002, 73(6): 884–892

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xu X W, Chen W, Yu G H, et al. Characteristic features of the surface rupture of the Hoh Sai Hu earthquake (Ms 8.1), northern Tibetan Plateau, China. Seismol Geol (in Chinese), 2002, 24(1): 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qiao X, Wang Q, Du R, et al. Characteristics of crustal deformation relating to Ms 8.1 Kunlunshan earthquake. J Geodesy Geodyn (in Chinese), 2002, 22(4): 6–11

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen J, Chen Y, Ding G Y, et al. Surface rupture zone of the 2001 earthquake Ms 8.1 west of Kunlun Pass northern Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Quaternary Sci (in Chinese), 2003, 23(6): 629–639

    Google Scholar 

  11. Xu L, Chen Y. Temporal and spatial rupture process of the great Kunlun Mountain Pass earthquake of November 14, 2001 from the GDSN long period waveform data. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2005, 48(1): 112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wan Y, Wang M, Shen Z, et al. Co-seismic slip distribution of the 2001west of Kunlun Mountain Pass earthquake inverted by GPS and leveling data. Seismol Geol (in Chinese), 2004, 26(3): 393–404

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin A, Fu B, Guo J, et al. Co-seismic strike-slip and rupture length produced by the 2001 Ms 8.1 central Kunlun earthquake. Science, 2002, 296: 2015–2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bowman D, King G, Tapponnier P. Slip partitioning by elastoplastic propagation of oblique slip at depth. Science, 2003, 300: 1121–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bouchon M, Vallée M. Observation of long supershear rupture during the Ms=8.1 Kunlunshan earthquake. Science, 2003: 301: 824–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lasserre C, Peltzer J F, Van Der Woerd J, et al. Co-seismic deformation of the M w=7.8 Kokoxili earthquake in Tibet, measured by synthetic aperture radar interferometry. J Geophys Res, 2005, 110(B12): 408, doi: 10.1029/2004JB003500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klinger Y, Xu X, Tapponnier P, et al. High-resolution satellite imagery mapping of the surface rupture and slip distribution of the M w∼7.8, 14 November 2001 Kokoxili earthquake, Kunlun fault, northern Tibet, China. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 2005, 95 (5): 1970–1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu X W, Yu G, Y Klinger, et al. Re-evaluation of surface rupture parameters and faulting segmentation of the 2001 Kunlunshan earthquake (M w7.8), Northern Tibetan Plateau, China. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111: B05316, doi: 10.1029/2004JB003488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rice J R. Localization of plastic deformation, 14. International Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 30 Aug. 1976, Delft, Netherlands, Report No. COO-3084/43, CONF-760835-1

  20. Aifantis E C. On the role of gradients in the localization of deformation and fracture. Int J Eng Sci (ISSN 0020-7225), 1992, 30(10): 1279–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu X W, Yu G, Chen G, et al. Near surface character of permanent geologic deformation across the mega-strike-slip faults in the northern tibetan Plateau. Seismol Geol (in Chinese), 2007, 29(2): 201–217

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rockwell T K, Ben-Zion Y. High localization of primary slip zones in large earthquakes from paleoseismic trenches: Observations and implicarions for earthquake physics. J Geophy Res, 2007, 112, B10304, doi: 10.1029/2006JB004764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tim D, Ken M C. Analog modeling of pull-apart basins. AAPG Bull, 1997, 81(11): 1804–1826

    Google Scholar 

  24. Basile C, Brun J P. Transtensional faulting patterns ranging from pull-apart basins to transform continental margins: An experimental investigation. J Struct Geol, 1999, 21(1): 23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lettis W, Bachhuber J, Witter R, et al. Influence of releasing step-overs on surface fault rupture and fault segmentation: Examples from the 17 August 1999 Izmit earthquake on the North Anatolian Fault, Turkey. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 2002, 92 (1): 19–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tamer Y D, Omer E, Ahmet D, et al. Step-over and bend structures along the 1999 Duzce earthquake surface rupture, North Anatolian Fault, Turkey. Bull Seismol Soci Amer, 2005, 95 (4): 1250–1262, doi: 10.1785/0120040082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wesnousky S. Predicting the endpoints of earthquake ruptures. Nature, 2006, 444: 358–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harris R A, Day S M. Dynamic 3D simulations of earthquakes on en echelon faults. Geophy Res Letts, 1999, GL900377, 26(14): 2089–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Antolik M R, Abercrombie E, Ekstrom G. The 14 November 2001 Kokoxili, Tibet earthquake: rupture transfer through a large extensional step-over. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 2004, 94: 1173–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tocheport A, Rivera L, Van der Woerd J. A study of the 14 November Kokoxili earthquake: History and geometry of the rupture from teleseismic data and field observations. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 2006, 96 (5): 1729–1741, doi: 10.1785/0120050200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wells D L, Coppersmith K J. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 1994, 84: 974–1002

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li S L, Zhang X K, Fan J, et al. Study on rupture zone of the M8.1 Kunlun Mountain earthquake using fault-zone trapped wave. Acta Seismol Sin (in Chinese), 2005, 27(1): 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lou H, Wang C Y, Ding Z, et al. Analysis of the trapped wave recorded in Kunlun fault zone. Chin J Geophys, 2006, 49(3): 788–796

    Google Scholar 

  34. Earthquake Administration of Qinghai Province, Institute of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration. The Active Kunlun Fault (in Chinese). Beijing: Seismological Press, 1999. 1–186

    Google Scholar 

  35. Peltzer G, Crampé F. Evidence of nonlinear elasticity of the crust from M w7.6 Manyi (Tibet) earthquake. Science, 1999, 286: 273–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu X W. Science investigation on the Mani earthquake, north Tibet. In: Editorial Board of China Earthquake Yearbook, ed. China Earthquake Yearbook (in Chinese). Beijing: Seismological Press, 1999. 327–329

    Google Scholar 

  37. Van der Woerd J, Ryerson F J, Tapponnier P, et al. The uniform sliprate along the Kunlun fault: Implications for seismic behaviour and large-scale tectonics. Geophys Res Lett, 2000, 27(16): 2353–2356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Holt W E, Chamot-Rooke N, Le P X, et al. Velocity field in Asia inferred from Quaternary fault slip rates and Global Positioning System observations. J Geophys Res, 105(B8): 19,185 (2000JB900045)

  39. Zhang P, Shen Z, Wang M, et al. Continuous deformation of the Tibetan Plateau from Global Positioning System data. Geology, 2004, 32: 809–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu Z, Wang Y, Ren J, et al. Activity of the Jinsha and Lanchang sutures, northern Qinghai-Xizang plateau in late Quaternary. Seismol Geol (in Chinese), 1993, 15(1): 28–31

    Google Scholar 

  41. Deng Q. Map of Active Tectonics in China (1:4000000). Beijing: Seismological Press, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ren J, Wang M. GPS measured crustal deformation of the Kunlun earthquake in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Quat Sci (in Chinese), 2005, 25(1): 34–44

    Google Scholar 

  43. Xu X W, Yu G H, Ma W T, et al. Evidence and method for determining the safety distance from the potential earthquake surface rupture on active fault. Seismol Geol (in Chinese), 2002, 24(4): 470–483

    Google Scholar 

  44. Han Z, Ran Y, Xu X W. Primary study on possible width and displacement of future surface rupture zone produced by buried active fault. Seismol Geol (in Chinese), 2002, 24(4): 484–494

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to XiWei Xu.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 40474037) and the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2004CB418401)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, X., Yu, G., Ma, W. et al. Rupture behavior and deformation localization of the Kunlunshan earthquake (M w 7.8) and their tectonic implications. Sci. China Ser. D-Earth Sci. 51, 1361–1374 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-008-0099-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-008-0099-z

Keywords

Navigation