Abstract
Melanin plays an important role in protecting organisms from ultraviolet radiation (UVR). Therefore, it is possible that differently colored strains can show different sensitivities to UVR. In the present work, life span, fertility and courtship behavior of wild type (w), ebony (e) and yellow (y) strains of Drosophila melanogaster were studied to evaluate their sensitivity to ultraviolet (UV). Because a range of phototoxic effects of UVR are mediated through generation of free radicals, levels of free radicals, lipid peroxide (malondialdehyde, MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity of three strains were examined to indicate their antioxidant defending ability and oxidative status. It was shown that w always had the highest lifespan and fertility not only in the control but also in UV-exposed groups. Moreover, lifespan and fertility of e were significantly higher (P<0.0001) than those of y in the UV-exposed groups, but not for the control. On the other hand, UV exposure had an adverse effect on courtship of flies. Stronger electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signals could be detected in w, e and y exposed to 5 min UV. And there were more significant changes of EPR signals in y than in w and e. UVR had no significant (P=0.1782) effect on the SOD activities. After pooling data from the control and UV-exposed groups, we found that w had a significantly (P<0.05) higher level of SOD activity, but e and y were nearly at the same levels (P>0.05). MDA levels were increased in the UV dose-dependent manner (P=0.0495). In conclusion, our results suggested that UVR can decrease life span and fertility of flies and do harm to courtship, which may be due to oxidative damage to flies tissues (e.g. central nervous system) induced by free radicals. w had the highest tolerance to UVR, which may be ascribed to its advantage of survival under the natural condition and at high level of SOD activity. Then differences of pigment between e and y in absorbing UV, shielding against UV and scavenging free radicals produced by UVR should be responsible for their different sensitivity to UVR.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Latocha M, Chodurek E, Kurkiewicz S, et al. Pyrolytic GC-MS analysis of melanin from black, gray and yellow strains of Drosophila melanogaster. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 2000, 56: 89–98 10.1016/S0165-2370(00)00082-6, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXlt1Kgsb4%3D
Gartner L P. Radiation-induced life span shortening in Drosophila. Gerontologia, 1973, 19: 295–302 4788964, 1:STN:280:DyaE2c7lsVOntQ%3D%3D, 10.1159/000211983
Pimental E, Tavera L, Cruces M P, et al. Low radon-dose effect on fecundity and egg-to-adult viability of Drosophila. Radiat Meas, 2003, 36: 511–516 10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00192-6, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXmvVOkt70%3D
McQuate J T. Chromosome loss caused by ultraviolet treatment of Drosophila spermatozoa. Genetics, 1954, 39: 565–580. 17247504, 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s%2FmsFCrsg%3D%3D
Moskalev A A, Zainullin V G. Role apoptotic cell death in radio induced aging in Drosophila melanogaster. Radiats Biol Radioecol, 2001, 41: 650–652 11785305, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xhs1Wrsbk%3D
Wittkopp P J, True J R, Carroll S B. Evolution in black and white: Genetic control of pigment patterns in Drosophila. Trends Genet, 2003, 19: 495–504 12957543, 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00194-X, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXmvVKlurw%3D
Ortonne J P. Photoprotective properties of skin melanin. Br J Dermatol, 2002, 146: 7–10 11966725, 10.1046/j.1365-2133.146.s61.3.x, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XksFSltLs%3D
Césarini J P. Melanins and their possible roles through biologica evolution. Adv Space Res, 1996, 18: 35–40 10.1016/0273-1177(96)00025-7
Swindells K, Rhodes L E. Influence of oral antioxidants on ultraviolet radiation-induced skin damage in humans. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, 2004, 20: 297–304 15533237, 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2004.00121.x, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtFahtbnJ
Snellman E, Strozyk M, Segerbäck D, et al. Effect of the spectral range of a UV lamp on the production of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in human skin in situ. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, 2003, 19: 281–286 14617102, 10.1046/j.1600-0781.2003.00063.x, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXpsFCj
Ozkur M K, Bozkurt M S, Balabanli B, et al. The effects of EGb 761 on lipid peroxide levels and superoxide dismutase activity in sunburn. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, 2002, 18: 117–120 12207673, 10.1034/j.1600-0781.2002.00727.x, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xntlekur8%3D
Hirata H, Fujii H. Free radicals in living systems: In vivo detection of bioradical with EPR spectroscopy. Curr Org Chem, 2006, 10: 521–534 10.2174/138527206776055268, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xit1Sjtb0%3D
Le Bourg E. Oxidative stress, aging and longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. FEBS Lett, 2001, 498: 183–186 11412853, 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02457-7
Arking R, Burde V, Graves K, et al. Forward and reverse selection for longevity in Drosophila is characterized by alteration of antioxidant gene expression and oxidative damage pattern. Exp Gerontol, 2000, 35: 167–185 10767577, 10.1016/S0531-5565(99)00094-7, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXitlOku7k%3D
Akeo K, Amaki S, Suzuki T, et al. Melanin granules prevent the cytotoxic effects of L-DOPA on retinal pigment epithelial cells in vitro by regulation of NO and superoxide radicals. Pigment Cell Res, 2000, 13: 80–88 10841029, 10.1034/j.1600-0749.2000.130206.x, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXktVOrtbc%3D
Lee G, Hall J C, Park J H. Doublesex gene expression in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurogenet, 2002, 16: 229–248 12745633, 10.1080/01677060216292, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjt1egsr8%3D
Tompkins L, McRobert S P. Regulation of behavioral and pheromonal aspects of sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster by the Sex-lethal gene. Genetics, 1989, 123: 535–541 2513254, 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2Fpt12ltA%3D%3D
Bonilla E, Medina-Leendertz S, Díaz S. Extension of life span and stress resistance of Drosophila melanogaster by long-term supplementation with melatonin. Exp Gerontol, 2002, 37: 629–638 11909680, 10.1016/S0531-5565(01)00229-7, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XitFWlsL8%3D
Wittkopp P J, Carroll S B, Kopp A. Reciprocal functions of the Drosophila Yellow and Ebony protein in the development and evolution of pigment patterns. Development, 2002, 129: 1849–1858 11934851, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XjslSlsr4%3D
McRobert S P, Tompkins L. The effect of transformer, doublesex and intersex mutations on the sexual behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 1985, 111: 89–96 3928434, 1:STN:280:DyaL2M3os1eitg%3D%3D
Gailey D A, Jackson F R, Siegel R W. Conditioning mutations in Drosophila melanogaster affect an experience-dependent behavioral modification in courting males. Genetics, 1984, 106: 613–623 17246201
Pan J X, Zhang S P, Tu T C, et al. EPR study on the photosensitized generation of reactive oxygen species by actinomycin D. Sci China Ser B-Chem, 2002, 45: 449–454 10.1360/02yb9058, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xntlyqsrk%3D
Zhang J M. Biological effects of ultraviolet on Drosophila melanogaster. Entomol Knowl (in Chinese), 1994, 31: 242–244
Hirsch H V, Mercer J, Sambaziotis H, et al. Behavioral effects of chronic exposure to low levels of lead in Drosophila melanogaster. Neurotoxicology, 2003, 24: 435–442 12782108, 10.1016/S0161-813X(03)00021-4, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXktVOhtr0%3D
Browning L S, Altenburg E. Studies in ultraviolet mutagenesis in Drosophila involving treatment of inseminated females. Genetics, 1964, 50: 695–699 14226244, 1:STN:280:DyaF2M%2FjtVKmsA%3D%3D
Sun J T, Molitor J, Tower J. Effects of simultaneous over-expression of Cu/ZnSOD and MnSOD on Drosophila melanogaster life span. Mech Ageing Dev, 2004, 125: 341–349 15130751, 10.1016/j.mad.2004.01.009, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjvVeqsb0%3D
Clancy D J, Gems D. Extension of LIFE-SPAN by loss of CHICO, a Drosophila insulin receptor substrate protein. Science, 2001, 292: 104–106 11292874, 10.1126/science.1057991, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXis1Grtrc%3D
Hwangbo D S, Gersham B, Tu M P, et al. Drosophila dFOXO controls lifespan and regulates insulin signaling in brain and fat body. Nature, 2004,429: 562–56 15175753, 10.1038/nature02549, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXks1Cgt7g%3D
Baden H P, Kollias N, Anderson R R, et al. Drosophila melanogaster larvae detect low doses of UVC radiation as Manifested by a writhing response. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol, 1996, 32: 187–196 8785418, 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6327(1996)32:2<187::AID-ARCH3>3.0.CO;2-W, 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjtF2nur0%3D
Mosse I B, Lyakh I P. Influence of melanin on mutation load in Drosophila population after long-term irradiation. Radiat Res, 1994, 139: 357–359 8073119, 10.2307/3578834, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXlvF2mu7k%3D
Riley P A. Melanin. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 1997, 29: 1235–1239 9451820, 10.1016/S1357-2725(97)00013-7, 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXltFejtg%3D%3D
Giacomoni P U. Open questions in photobiology III. Melanin and photoprotection. J Photochem Photobiol B, 1995, 29: 87–89 7472805, 10.1016/1011-1344(95)90265-1, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXnslylt7o%3D
Garland C F, Garland F C, Gorham E D. Epidemiologic evidence for different roles of Ultraviolet A and B radiation in melanoma mortality rates. Annal Epidemiol, 2003, 13: 395–404 10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00461-1
Sasaki H, Itoh T, Akamatsu H, et al. Effects of calcium concentration on the SOD activity and UVB-induced cytotoxicity in cultured human keratinocytes. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, 2005, 21: 9–14 15634218, 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2005.00117.x, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhs1Kisbw%3D
Harman D. Aging: A theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. Gerontology, 11: 298–300
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 30471233), and State Major Basic Research Development Program of China (Grant No. 2006CB102100)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Liu, R., Wang, A. et al. Phototoxic effect of UVR on wild type, ebony and yellow mutants of Drosophila melanogaster: Life Span, fertility, courtship and biochemical aspects. SCI CHINA SER C 51, 885–893 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-008-0085-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-008-0085-5