Abstract
When there is uncertainty in sibling relationship, the classical affected sib-pair (ASP) linkage tests may be severely biased. This can happen, for example, if some of the half sib-pairs are mixed with full sib-pairs. The genomic control method has been used in association analysis to adjust for population structures. We show that the same idea can be applied to ASP linkage analysis with uncertainty in sibling relationship. Assuming that, in addition to the candidate marker, null markers that are unlinked to the disease locus are also genotyped, we may use the information on these loci to estimate the proportion of half sib-pairs and to correct for the bias and variance distortion caused by the heterogeneity of sibling relationship. Unlike in association studies, the null loci are not required to be matched with the candidate marker in allele frequency for ASP linkage analysis. This makes our approach flexible in selecting null markers. In our simulations, using a number of 30 or more null loci can effectively remove the bias and variance distortion. It is also shown that, even the null loci are weakly linked to the disease locus, the proposed method can also provide satisfactory correction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amrita R, Weeks D E. Relationship uncertainty linkage statistics (RULS): Affected relative pair statistics that model relationship uncertainty. Genet Epidemiol, 2008, 32: 313–324
Blackwelder C, Elston R C. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci. Genet Epidemiol, 1985, 2: 85–97
Boehnke M, Cox N J. Accurate inference of relationship in sib-pair linkage studies. Amer J Hum Genet, 1997, 61: 423–429
Chakraborty R, Jin L. Determination of relatedness between individuals using DNA fingerprinting. Hum Biol, 1993, 65: 875–895
Chakraborty R, Jin L. A unified approach to study hypervariable polymorphisms: Statistical considerations of determining relatedness and population distances. EXS, 1993, 67: 153–175
Devlin B, Roeder K. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics, 1999, 55: 997–1004
Devlin B, Roeder K, Wasserman L. Genomic control, a new approach to genetic-based association studies. Theor Popul Biol, 2001, 60: 155–166
Ehm M G, Wagner M. Test statistic to detect errors in sib-pair relationships. Amer J Hum Genet Suppl, 1996, 59: A217
Ehm M G, Wagner M. A test statistic to detect errors in sib-pair relationships. Amer J Hum Genet, 1998, 62: 181–188
Goring H H, Ott J. Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases. Eur J Genet, 1997, 5: 69–77
Gorroochurn P, Heiman G A, Hodge S E, et al. Centralizing the non-central chi-square: a new method to correct for population stratification in genetic case-control association studies. Genet Epidemiol, 2006, 30: 277–289
Risch N. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. Ann Hum Genet, 1990, 46: 229–241
Stivers D N, Zhong Y, Hanis C L, et al. REL-TYPE: a computer program for determining biological re-latedness between individuals based on allele sharing at mi-crosatellite loci. Amer J Hum Genet Suppl, 1996, 59: A190
Schaid D J, Elston R C, Tran L, et al. Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis: combining full-sib and half-sib pairs. Genet Epidemiol, 2000, 19: 30–51
Setakis E, Stirnadel H, Balding D J. Logistic regression protects against population structure in genetic association studies. Genome Res, 2006, 16: 290–296
Shih M C, Whittemore A S. Allele-sharing among affected relatives: non-parametric methods for identifying genes. Stat Meth Med Res, 2001, 10: 27–55
Whittemore A S, Tu I P. Simple, robust linkage tests for affected sibs. Amer J Hum Genet, 1998, 62: 1228–1242
Zheng G, Freidlin B, Li Z, et al. Genomic control for association studies under various genetic models. Biometrics, 2005, 61: 186–192
Zheng G, Freidlin B, Gastwirth J L. Robust genomic control for association studies. Amer J Hum Genet, 2006, 78: 350–356
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, M., Cui, W. & Yang, Y. Correcting for biases in affected sib-pair linkage analysis caused by uncertainty in sibling relationship. Sci. China Math. 55, 1127–1135 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-012-4373-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-012-4373-3